Skip to content

Effect of Sonication on Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Strategy.

Effect of Sonication on Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Strategy.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04304885
Enrollment
56
Registered
2020-03-12
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2021-01-15
Last updated
2021-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biofilm, Hip Prosthesis Infection, Joint Infection, Prosthesis-Related Infections

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty, complication, total hip arthroplasty, periprosthetic infection, revision arthroplasty, sonication, biofilm

Brief summary

It is not known in the literature how much sonication affects the patient's treatment. Another important issue is that the place of this method in diagnosis is not clear. The aim of this study is to contribute to the literature on this issue and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of sonication prospectively using the new definition and effect of sonication on the treatment strategy in terms of infection in patients with PJI.

Detailed description

Total knee and hip arthroplasties are successful surgical procedures that are widely applied all over the world and provide high patient satisfaction and increased quality of life. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is a serious complication that negatively affects the targeted result, decreases patient satisfaction, and increases morbidity and mortality after total joint replacement. Another important issue, the previous infection is the most important reason for the failure of surgery in revision arthroplasty. It is known that the success of PJI treatment seriously can be affected by the type of microorganism and antibiotic sensitivity. Therefore, microbiological examination methods are always of interest, and one of them is the sonication method.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSonication method

Sonication dislodges adherent bacteria from explanted prosthetics by ultrasound and may improve the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Sponsors

Bezmialem Vakif University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients scheduled for revision arthroplasty (aseptic revision, septic revision, instability, and periprosthetic fracture)

Exclusion criteria

* who do not accept to participate in research * insufficient data for new definition criteria * acute periprosthetic infections * patients with systemic inflammatory disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity14 daysTo determine how many patients diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infection can be detected by sonication method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in antibiotic treatment.14 daysIn how many patients the sonication method will cause a change in treatment.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactFatih Yildiz, MD
yildizfatih@yahoo.com+905059917419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026