Skip to content

Clinical Cross Reactions Between Anacardiaceae

Evaluating the Correlation Between the Results of the Allergy Work-up for Different Allergens of the Anacardiaceae Family

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04304586
Acronym
Cross-Anacards
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-03-11
Start date
2006-01-01
Completion date
2020-06-01
Last updated
2020-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Suspected Allergy to Anacardiaceae

Keywords

Food allergy, Skin tests, Food challenge, Cashew, Pistachio

Brief summary

The prevalence of food allergies has increased in recent decades, ranging from 1 to 3% of the general population. According to international literature and French national surveys, nuts today represent a group of allergens often associated with severe allergic reactions. They are responsible for 18 to 40% of deaths from food-related anaphylaxis. Among all nuts, the prevalence of anacardiac allergies (mainly cashew and pistachio) continues to increase and has become a growing public health problem. Today, global production is estimated at 4.9 million tonnes of cashews and 1.1 million tonnes of pistachios. The resulting increased exposure may explain the increased prevalence of allergic reactions reported to these fruits. In addition, anaphylactic reactions to anacardiaceae are reported to be even more severe than those occurring in subjects allergic to peanuts. Cashews and pistachios are known to exhibit immunological cross-reactions with one another. In fact, they have a strong sequential homology between their storage allergens Ana o 1 / Pis v 3 (7S vicilin, 78% homology); Ana o 2 / Pis v 2 (legume 11S, 80% homology) and Ana o 3 / Pis v 1 (albumin 2S, 70% homology). For this reason, some authors talk about the cashew / pistachio syndrome and associate the two allergenic sources by considering them as one, in clinical practice. The diagnosis of allergy to nuts, and therefore to anacardiaceae, is based on a compatible clinical history, the presence of specific IgE (demonstrated by positivity to realistic skin tests and serum IgE assay), and positivity on the oral food challenge test. In clinical practice, taking into account the cashew / pistachio syndrome, when the allergy work-up for cashew is negative, allergists tend to advise to reintroduce pistachio at home, considering the two allergens as sufficiently homologous to authorize such a practice. In this context, the investigators decided to check whether this practice, which is based mainly on in vitro homologies, is risk-free, based on the clinical experience of our center.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient evaluated at the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier (France) * Suspicion of food allergy to Anacardiaceae * Allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio including at least skin tests, and possible specific IgE and food challenge

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients included in other trials that don't allow them to be included in the present one

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PPV and NPV1 dayPPV and NPV of the results of skin tests and food challenge to either cashew or pistachio to predict a concordant result for pistachio or cashew, respectively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative risk1 dayFinding risk factors predictive of discrepancies between the results of the allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026