Skip to content

Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine in Elective Upper Limb Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

A Prospective, Double Masked, up and Down Sequential Method to Estimate the Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine in Elective Upper Limb Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04304157
Acronym
dexdix
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-03-11
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2020-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intravenous Drug Usage

Brief summary

Auxiliary drugs augment the effect of local anesthetic in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). The purpose of our study was to estimate the median effective dose (ED50) of Dexmedetomidine in elective upper limb Lidocaine 0.5% IVRA.

Detailed description

Since its innovation in 1908 by Dr August Bier of Germany, Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) has stood the test of time as simple, safe and effective technique of regional anesthesia. 1 The technique entails insertion of intravenous catheter into a surgical limb before isolating it from the general circulation by tourniquet then inject local anesthetic (LA) into this isolated limb. 2 IVRA block is preferably used with short surgical procedures or maneuvers of the upper or lower extremity. Nevertheless, the technique has gained popularity for procedures of the upper extremity because of tourniquet issues like tourniquet pain, and other safety concerns that arise more often with lower extremity IVRA, essentially leakage of the of LA.3 Unfortunately, using LA solely for IVRA has not achieved optimum intraoperative analgesia or overcome the frequently reported tourniquet pain.4 A long list of adjuvants, to mention few: morphine, muscle relaxant and clonidine, have been used to augment LA action and ameliorate tourniquet pain. 5 Dexmedetomidine (DEX) a potent α 2 agonist that have unique analgesic, anxiolytic and sedative profile has been called upon as attractive adjunct in general as well as regional anesthesia with enticing results. Several studies have pursued DEX median effective dose (ED50) in different settings e.g., co induction agent with Propofol, in laryngeal muscle insertion and with local anesthetic to enhance the quality of spinal anesthesia. 6 However, DEX effective median dose ED50 with IVRA for upper limb has not been investigated elsewhere, so far. The up and down sequential method of Dixon and Mood is a common sequential design method used in anesthesia research to detect the ED50. It is a sequence of experiments performed under the assumption that satisfactory response is followed by decrease in test dose for the next patient in the series, and non- satisfactory response is followed by increase in test dose for the next patient in the series. 7 The purpose of this study is to estimate the median effective dose of Dexmedetomidine (DEX) with Lidocaine 0.5% IVRA in upper limb elective surgeries, using modified Dixon's up and down method.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) a potent α 2 agonist that have unique analgesic, anxiolytic and sedative profile has been called upon as attractive adjunct in general as well as regional anesthesia with enticing results. Several studies have pursued DEX median effective dose (ED50) in different settings e.g., co induction agent with Propofol, in laryngeal muscle insertion and with local anesthetic to enhance the quality of spinal anesthesia

Sponsors

Tanta University
CollaboratorOTHER
South Valley University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 60 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II * Undergoing minor upper limb orthopedic surgical procedures in the hand, wrist and forearms including: metacarpal fracture, tendon injury, and carpal tunnel release.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to test drugs. * vascular disease. * contraindication to tourniquet applications. * difficulty to manipulate the surgical limb. * surgery expected to last more than an hour. * patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. Pain intensity measure8 hoursPatients reported pain intensity at baseline, every 5 minutes during the surgery and every hour for 6 hours after the surgery. Pain intensity scored 0-10 (0 being no pain at all, and 10 the worst pain ever).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in mean blood pressure in mmHg8 h oursmean blood pressure in mmHg was measured at baseline, every 5 minutes during the surgery and every hour for 6 hours after the surgery
changes in heart rate (beat per minute)8 hoursChanges in heart at baseline, every 5 minutes during the surgery and every hour for 6 hours after the surgery

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026