Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NG101 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Diabetic or Idiopathic Gastroparesis

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study, of the Safety and Efficacy of NG101 Administered Orally to Patients With Gastroparesis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04303195
Enrollment
161
Registered
2020-03-10
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2023-02-25
Last updated
2025-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Gastroparesis, Idiopathic Gastroparesis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of various dose levels of NG101 compared with placebo in adult participants with gastroparesis during 12 weeks of treatment.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group , placebo-controlled, multicenter US-based study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 dose levels of NG101 (Metopimazine mesylate) compared with placebo in participants with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis. The study will enroll approximately 140 participants. Following the Screening Period, there is a 2-week Pretreatment Period during which participants will complete an electronic daily diary. Participants eligible for the clinical study will be randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive either NG101 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg, or matching placebo during a 12-week Treatment Period. All participants will be asked to take one capsule 30 minutes before a meal 3 times a day and 30 minutes before bedtime for a total of 4 capsules daily (QID). The total duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 20 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGNG101

Capsules

DRUGPlacebo

Capsules

Sponsors

Neurogastrx, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis * Symptoms consistent with gastroparesis (nausea, vomiting, early satiety, post-prandial fullness, and abdominal pain) * Documented evidence of no mechanical obstruction * Delayed gastric emptying as demonstrated by gastric scintigraphy or breath test

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled diabetes (defined as HgbA1c \> 10%) * Severe postural symptoms or evidence of unexplained recurrent dizziness * Participant has received and tolerated domperidone and showed no notable symptomatic improvement in gastroparesis symptoms * Participant has had endoscopic pyloric injections of botulinum toxin within the 6 months prior to the Screening Visit. * Participant engages in daily recreational use of marijuana * Prolactin levels \> 2 x ULN

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from Baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD). Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD) for early satiety severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of VomitingBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for the number of discrete episodes of vomiting. Participants were asked to record the number of episodes of vomiting in the past 24 hours. Each episode counts as 1. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 3-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 3-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, and postprandial fullness severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity ScoreBaseline to Week 12Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 4-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 4-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and abdominal pain severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with symptomatic idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis took part in the study at 51 investigative sites in the United States from 01 August 2020 to 25 February 2023

Pre-assignment details

Participants eligible for the study were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive either NG101 treatment arms of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg, or matching placebo during a 12-week Treatment Period. Randomization was stratified on the following factors: gastroparesis etiology (diabetes vs idiopathic), sex (male vs female), and current cannabinoid use (yes vs no).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NG101 - 5 mg
NG101 5 mg, capsules, orally, QID (4 times a day) for up to 12 weeks NG101: Capsules
40
NG101 - 10 mg
NG101 10 mg, capsules, orally, QID (4 times a day) for up to 12 weeks NG101: Capsules
41
NG101 - 20 mg
NG101 20 mg, capsules, orally, QID (4 times a day) for up to 12 weeks NG101: Capsules
40
Placebo
Placebo-matching, capsules, orally, QID (4 times a day) for up to 12 weeks Placebo: Capsules
40
Total161

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1370
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1014
Overall StudyNo study drug administered or protocol deviation0202
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNG101 - 5 mgNG101 - 10 mgNG101 - 20 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants9 Participants10 Participants11 Participants38 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants32 Participants30 Participants29 Participants123 Participants
Age, Continuous52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62
Cannabinoid use
No
36 Participants38 Participants37 Participants35 Participants146 Participants
Cannabinoid use
Yes
4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants20 Participants20 Participants16 Participants73 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants21 Participants20 Participants24 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gastroparesis etiology
Diabetic
18 Participants19 Participants19 Participants17 Participants73 Participants
Gastroparesis etiology
Idiopathic
22 Participants22 Participants21 Participants23 Participants88 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants9 Participants4 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
39 Participants32 Participants33 Participants30 Participants134 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 participants41 participants40 participants40 participants161 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants34 Participants33 Participants33 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 410 / 400 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 4012 / 4121 / 4014 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 400 / 411 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline of Nausea Severity Score

Change from Baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD). Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Per Protocol population included all participants in the Intent-To-Treat Population (all enrolled participants who were randomized) who do not have any major protocol deviations that would affect efficacy as determined by the study team.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity Score-3.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.331
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity Score-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0348
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity Score-3.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.348
PlaceboChange From Baseline of Nausea Severity Score-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.347
p-value: 0.13595% CI: [-1.67, 0.23]ANOVA
p-value: 0.099795% CI: [-1.79, 0.16]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.219595% CI: [-1.58, 0.37]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity Score

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 3-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 3-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, and postprandial fullness severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity Score-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.334
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity Score-3.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.351
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity Score-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 3-symptom Severity Score-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
p-value: 0.52595% CI: [-1.27, 0.65]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.399195% CI: [-1.41, 0.56]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.900695% CI: [-1.05, 0.92]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity Score

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for 4-symptom severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week, the 4-symptom severity score is the average of the mean daily scores of nausea, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and abdominal pain severity scores. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity Score-3.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.306
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity Score-3.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.321
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity Score-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.322
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 4-symptom Severity Score-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.321
p-value: 0.600995% CI: [-1.11, 0.64]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.465495% CI: [-1.23, 0.56]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.884295% CI: [-0.83, 0.97]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity Score

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity Score-2.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity Score-2.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.292
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity Score-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.293
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Severity Score-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.295
p-value: 0.903495% CI: [-0.76, 0.86]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.974295% CI: [-0.68, 0.63]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.223595% CI: [-0.31, 1.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of Vomiting

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for the number of discrete episodes of vomiting. Participants were asked to record the number of episodes of vomiting in the past 24 hours. Each episode counts as 1. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of Vomiting-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of Vomiting-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of Vomiting-0.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Discrete Episodes of Vomiting-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
p-value: 0.356795% CI: [-0.34, 0.12]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.112995% CI: [-0.43, 0.05]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.45995% CI: [-0.33, 0.15]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity Score

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD) for early satiety severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period, a participant's score for that week was the mean of the daily scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity Score-3.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.343
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity Score-3.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity Score-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.362
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Early Satiety Severity Score-2.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.361
p-value: 0.794495% CI: [-1.11, 0.85]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.495695% CI: [-1.36, 0.66]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.62695% CI: [-0.76, 1.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity Score

Change from baseline at Weeks 7 through 12 (average) as measured by patient's daily diary entries during participation in the study for postprandial fullness severity score. Participants were asked to rate their symptoms at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A score of 0 indicates no symptoms and a score of 10 indicates the worst possible symptoms. For each week in the 2-week Pretreatment Period, the 12-week Treatment Period, and the 2-week Follow-up Period. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NG101 - 5 mgChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity Score-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.373
NG101 - 10 mgChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity Score-2.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.392
NG101 - 20 mgChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity Score-2.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.393
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postprandial Fullness Severity Score-2.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.394
p-value: 0.886695% CI: [-1.15, 1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.869995% CI: [-1.19, 1.01]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.729795% CI: [-0.91, 1.29]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026