Skip to content

Effectiveness of fESWT in the Treatment of CTS

The Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04302909
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-03-10
Start date
2019-04-24
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2020-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Brief summary

The carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy in the general population.The focus extracorporeal shock wave (fEWST) is a non invasive treatment for various diseases. FESWT is new and potential treatment for peripheral nerve entrapment/ peripheral neuropathy . But there is still little known about the effects and long term effects of fESWT in the treatment of CTS.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of fESWT in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome compared to participants receiving only night splint. Therefore 40 patients with mild to moderate CTS (verified by nerve conduction velocity) will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints. Evaluation will be performed at baseline (VAS, hand grip, electrodiagnostic parameters, questionnaires), 3 weeks (VAS, hand grip, questionnaires), 12 and 24 weeks (VAS, hand grip, electrodiagnostic parameters, questionnaires) after treatment.

Interventions

40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.

OTHERsham focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy

40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.

40 Patients with mild to moderate CTS will be randomized to receive either fESWT (1-session a week for 3 weeks) or sham fESWT(1-session a week for 3 weeks). All subjects will be asked to wear night splints.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- mild to moderate CTS verified by nerve conduction velocity

Exclusion criteria

* metabolic diseases * blood clotting problems * systemic diseases * polyneuropathy * chemotherapy during the study * corticosteroid therapy * use of anticoagulation * history of trauma/surgery or nerve lesion of the teated extremity * CTS surgery on the affected hand * ICD/ pacemaker implantation * other therapy for the affected hand during the study * acute inflammation or infections * severe mental illnesses/psychiatric diseases * severe neurological diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VASbaseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatmentVisual Analog Scale: Change from baseline of pain 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hand grip strengthbaseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatmenthand grip strength:
distal motor latency of the median nervebaseline,12th and 24th weeks after treatmentelectrophysiological parameter, using nerve conduction velocity to measure distal motor latency and antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve. Change from baseline in conduction velocity of median nerve on 12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
sensory conduction velocity of the median nervebaseline, 12th and 24th weeks after treatmentelectrophysiological parameter, using nerve conduction velocity to measure distal motor latency and antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve. Change from baseline in conduction velocity of median nerve on 12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
SF-36baseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment36-item Short Form Health Survey: Change from baseline in quality of life 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.
Boston Scalebaseline, 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatmentBoston Symptom Severity Score: Change from baseline in severity of symptoms and functional status 3th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactChristina Gesslbauer, Dr.
christina.gesslbauer@meduniwien.ac.at0043 40040043330
Backup ContactChristina Gesslbauer

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026