Skip to content

Single Arm Trial of a Multi-component Commercial Digital Weight Loss Program

Single Arm Trial of a Multi-component Commercial Digital Weight Loss Program

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04302389
Enrollment
153
Registered
2020-03-10
Start date
2021-02-10
Completion date
2021-11-01
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weight Loss

Brief summary

The goal of the proposed research project is to evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of an online multicomponent commercial weight loss program and to understand the relationship between program engagement and weight loss and health outcomes.

Detailed description

Technology is changing the opportunities to deliver behavioral weight loss programs and providing a way to extend their reach to wider audiences. Commercial programs that were once completely delivered via in person meetings at brick-and-mortar businesses are now expanding to virtual programs. WW (formerly known as Weight Watchers) is an industry leader and one of few commercial programs that has significant evidence for efficacy on weight loss. Their program currently includes a mobile app - that helps people follow the WW Program, rewards for consistent tracking and achieving milestones, an online community to connect with other users, and a 24/7 text chat with coaches. Previous research by the investigators and others reveals that greater engagement in an online group-based weight loss program is associated with greater weight loss. We have found that an online group coaching program paired with a calorie tracking mobile app is effective at producing weight loss. WW is testing a new comprehensive program that involves an updated program paired with virtual workshops that offer actionable behavior change techniques for members, led by a trained WW coach. They have agreed to fund us to perform a one-arm trial of their new comprehensive program that includes a holistic approach to healthy lifestyle (activity, diet, and mindset). Findings will inform the continued development of this program. Our aims are as follows: 1) To examine the preliminary outcomes and acceptability of a multicomponent online commercial weight loss program that includes a mobile app, incentives for tracking, weekly virtual workshops, and an online community. Preliminary outcome is defined as weight change from baseline to 3 and 6-months. Secondary preliminary outcomes include changes in diet quality, physical activity, quality of life, sleep quality, and food cravings from baseline to 6 months. Acceptability of each program component and the overall program will be evaluated at 6 months. 2) To examine whether greater app use, greater engagement in the online community, and engagement with a higher number of peers (in the online community) predict greater weight loss at 3- and 6-months. 3) To examine the associations between total use of program components (and each individual program component) and change in weight. We hypothesize that greater use of program components (individually and total) will predict greater weight loss.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALmyWW App, Virtual Workshops, and Private Facebook Group

The 6-month intervention includes the use of WW's mobile app, weekly virtual workshops, and a private online community. Participants are given a personalized food plan based on expert healthy eating guidelines and the latest nutritional science, an activity plan designed to promote regular physical activity and techniques to help shift members towards a helpful mindset for lasting change all within the WW app. Participants will attend weekly virtual workshops led by an expert WW Coach. The coach will help with goal setting, overcoming setbacks, and follow-up on progress toward goals each week. Participants will be encouraged to participate in a private Facebook group that gives participants an opportunity to receive motivational support from each other. Participants can post about their journey through photos, videos, and comments.

Sponsors

WW International Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Connecticut
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This project includes a one-arm trial to evaluate WW's new lifestyle modification program.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-75 years old. 2. BMI 25-45 kg/m2. 3. Has Wi-Fi connectivity at home 4. Able to participate in the study in English. 5. Self-reported desire to lose weight. 6. Willing to follow recommendations required by study protocol. 7. Willing to include demographic information (e.g., ethnicity, income and education) 8. Lives in the United States

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study period. 2. Bipolar disorder, substance abuse, psychosis, bulimia, binge eating disorder, or severe depression. 3. Had bariatric surgery or plans to have any surgery during the study 4. Unable to make dietary changes or increase physical activity. 5. Unable to walk ¼ mile unaided without stopping 6. Smoker or use nicotine vape daily. 7. Participants that are currently, or within the last 6 months, trying to lose weight via a structured weight-loss program (e.g., at a medical center, university, commercial programs) 8. Participants who were a member of WW within the past 12 months. 9. Participants who are involved in any other research studies at this time. 10. Weight loss of ≥ 5 kg in the previous 6 months. 11. Reported health problems that make weight loss or unsupervised exercise unsafe or unreasonable (e.g., chronic pain, orthopedic limitations, heart problems). 12. Untreated thyroid disease or any changes (type or dose) in thyroid medication in last 6 months. 13. Taking any prescription medication with known effects on appetite or weight (e.g., oral steroids, weight loss medications such as Qysmia, Contrave, etc.) with the exception of subjects on a stable dose of SSRIs for 6 months. 14. Chronic/inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders (irritable bowel syndrome is acceptable). 15. History of heart problems (e.g., angina, bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, etc.) within previous 6 months. 16. Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. 17. Major surgery within the previous 6 months. 18. Presence of implanted cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker. 19. History of cancer within past 5 years or current treatment for cancer (completely resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma acceptable if treatment completed more than 6 months prior to enrollment). 20. Meets criteria for severe depression on the PHQ-9 (score of \>20) or endorsement of Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself in some way. 21. Hospitalization for psychiatric disorders during the past 12 months. 22. Not willing to sign an NDA; or indicated they do not want to agree to NDA's terms. 23. Unable to attend any virtual workshop meeting times. 24. Does not have an iPhone.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Days Diet Tracking Feature Was Used in App6 monthsPercent of days participants used the diet tracking feature in the WW app during the intervention to track their daily food intake. A day of use will be defined as a day where participants tracked any food item in the WW app.
Intervention Acceptability6 monthsPercent of participants who agree or strongly agree that the program made them feel healthier.
Percent Change in Weight From Baseline to 3 MonthsBaseline to 3-monthsWeight was measured using a smart scale at baseline and at the three month assessment.
Weight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 6 MonthsBaseline to 6-monthsWeight will be measured using a smart scale at all assessments. Weight change will be calculated as weight at 6 months in pounds minus baseline weight in pounds. Lower values mean more weight loss.
Number of Days Physical Activity Tracking Feature Was Used in App6 monthsNumber of days participants used the physical activity feature in the WW app during the intervention. A day of use will be defined as any day in which any physical activity was logged. Total days possible = 168 days.
Number of Weekly Virtual Workshops Attended6 monthsNumber of weekly workshops attended by participants during the program. During the 6-month intervention, there were a total of 24 weekly workshops.
Number of Weekly Check Ins Attended6 monthsNumber of weekly check ins completed by participants during the program. During the 6-month intervention, there were 24 opportunities for weekly check ins. Higher numbers mean more weekly check ins were completed.
Number of Weeks Participants Engaged in the Private, Online Community6 monthsAll posts, comments, and reactions made in the Facebook group were captured using Grytics for Facebook each of the 24 weeks of the intervention. Participants were considered engaged with the intervention by making at least one post, one comment, and/or one reaction (e.g., like) during the intervention week. Values could range from 0 to 24 weeks with higher numbers indicating more frequent engagement in the intervention.
Weight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 3 Months3 monthsWeight will be assessed via digital scales provided to participants. Weight change will be calculated by subtracting weight in pounds at 3 months from baseline weight. Lower values indicate greater weight loss in pounds.
Percent Weight Change From Baseline to 6 Months6 monthsWeight is assessed via digital scales provided to participants. Percent weight change will be calculated by subtracting 6 month weight in pounds from baseline weight in pounds, dividing by baseline weight in pounds, and then multiplying this number by 100. Lower values indicated greater weight loss.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fruit Intake ScoreBaseline to 6-monthsAt baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruit intake. 1 assessed fruit intake. Change in fruit intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in fruit intake.
Change in Salad Intake Scorebaseline and 6 monthsAt baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruits and vegetables. 1 assessed salad intake. Change in salad intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in salad intake.
Change in Physical ActivityBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in physical activity will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). The GPAQ has questions assessing activity at work, travel to and from places, and recreational activities. The number of minutes spent on each activity is assigned a METs value to determine level of energy expenditure. The higher the METs value the higher the activity level.
Changes in Quality of LifeBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in weight related quality of life will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. This is a 31-item measure assessing physical function (11 items), self-esteem (7 items), sexual life (4 items), public distress (5 items), and work (4 items). Scores range from 0-100, with 100 representing the best quality of life. Change was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Higher values indicate greater increases in quality of life.
Changes in Sleep QualityBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in sleep quality will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. This measure contains 10 items to assess sleep quality with a score possible score of 0 - 21. Lower scores represent better the sleep quality (\< 5 is associated with good sleep quality; \> 5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Change in sleep quality was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Lower values indicate improvements in sleep quality.
Changes in Food CravingsBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in food cravings will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Food Craving Inventory. This inventory includes 28 foods that are scored based on level of craving ranging in answers from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) for each. A mean is calculated across the 28 items. Scores then would range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5. Higher scores indicate more frequent cravings. Change was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Higher scores indicate greater increases in food cravings.
Changes in HungerBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in hunger will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Hunger VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). This one-question measure asks How hungry did you feel over the past week and is composed of a slider with words anchored at each end describing the extremes (Not at all hungry, Extremely hungry). Participants rated their hunger over the past week using a slider on a visual analog scale ranging from 0=not at all hungry to 100=extremely hungry. Change in hunger was then calculated by subtracting the hunger score at 6 months from the hunger score at baseline. Higher values indicate increases in hunger over time and lower values indicate decreases in hunger over time.
Changes in Positive Behavioral AutomaticityBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in behavioral automaticity will be measured using the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index (SRBAI). This 4-item measure assesses whether Behavior X is something... I do automatically, I do without having to consciously remember, I do without thinking, and I start doing before I realize I'm doing it. Items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A mean score was calculated for each behavior. Then, mean scores were calculated for the 7 healthy behaviors to produce a positive behavioral automaticity score which could range from 1 to 7. Change in positive behavioral automaticity was then calculated by subtracting the 6 month value from the baseline value. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral automaticity for healthy behaviors.
Changes in Self-CompassionBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in self-compassion will be measured using the Self-Compassion Scale. This is a 26-item measure of self-compassion that consists of six subscales: self-kindness, self-judgement, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identified. Items were rated a scale ranging from 1=almost never to 5=almost always. Subscales are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. A total self-compassion score can be obtained by reverse scoring the negative subscale items (self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification) and computing a grand mean of all six subscale means. The total possible scores range from 1-5. Then to calculate change in self-compassion, we subtracted the 6 month value from the baseline value. Higher scores mean greater increases in self-compassion over time.
Change in Well-beingBaseline to 6-monthsChanges in well-being will be measured using the WHO-5 Well Being Index (0-100 score where higher scores mean greater well-being). Change in well-being was then calculated by subtracting the 6 month score from the baseline score. Higher values indicate increases in well-being over time.
Change in Vegetable Intake Scorebaseline to 6 monthsAt baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruits and vegetables. 1 assessed vegetable intake. Change in vegetable intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in vegetable intake.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lifestyle Modification Program
This 6-month intervention includes the use of three components: WW's mobile app, virtual workshops, and a private online community. The WW Program involves: self-monitoring of weight, dietary intake, and physical activity; making dietary changes; increasing physical activity; shifting to a more helpful mindset; and learning behavioral strategies to manage these goals. Each week, participants will set goals and weigh-in with a coach via virtual workshop. Participants will be encouraged to use the app and private online community daily and attend weekly virtual workshops. The weekly virtual workshop led by a trained WW Coach features a behavior change technique and enables the participant to practice it to support their goals. These are actionable techniques and strategies that are grounded in scientific research. myWW App, Virtual Workshops, and Private Facebook Group: The 6-month intervention includes the use of WW's mobile app, weekly virtual workshops, and a private online community. Participants are given a personalized food plan based on expert healthy eating guidelines and the latest nutritional science, an activity plan designed to promote regular physical activity and techniques to help shift members towards a helpful mindset for lasting change all within the WW app. Participants will attend weekly virtual workshops led by an expert WW Coach.
153
Total153

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLifestyle Modification Program
Age, Continuous41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
BMI31.77 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
134 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
107 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
153 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 153
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 153
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 153

Outcome results

Primary

Intervention Acceptability

Percent of participants who agree or strongly agree that the program made them feel healthier.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Lifestyle Modification ProgramIntervention Acceptability102 Participants
Primary

Number of Days Physical Activity Tracking Feature Was Used in App

Number of days participants used the physical activity feature in the WW app during the intervention. A day of use will be defined as any day in which any physical activity was logged. Total days possible = 168 days.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramNumber of Days Physical Activity Tracking Feature Was Used in App106.37 daysStandard Deviation 73.22
Primary

Number of Weekly Check Ins Attended

Number of weekly check ins completed by participants during the program. During the 6-month intervention, there were 24 opportunities for weekly check ins. Higher numbers mean more weekly check ins were completed.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramNumber of Weekly Check Ins Attended11.91 number of weekly check-ins attendedStandard Deviation 7.63
Primary

Number of Weekly Virtual Workshops Attended

Number of weekly workshops attended by participants during the program. During the 6-month intervention, there were a total of 24 weekly workshops.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramNumber of Weekly Virtual Workshops Attended9.68 number of weekly workshops attendedStandard Deviation 7.16
Primary

Number of Weeks Participants Engaged in the Private, Online Community

All posts, comments, and reactions made in the Facebook group were captured using Grytics for Facebook each of the 24 weeks of the intervention. Participants were considered engaged with the intervention by making at least one post, one comment, and/or one reaction (e.g., like) during the intervention week. Values could range from 0 to 24 weeks with higher numbers indicating more frequent engagement in the intervention.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramNumber of Weeks Participants Engaged in the Private, Online Community6.03 number of weeks a participant engagedStandard Deviation 7.03
Primary

Percent Change in Weight From Baseline to 3 Months

Weight was measured using a smart scale at baseline and at the three month assessment.

Time frame: Baseline to 3-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramPercent Change in Weight From Baseline to 3 Months-8.19 Percent changeStandard Deviation 7.51
Comparison: This was a within-subject comparison at two timepoints (baseline, 3 months)p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Percent of Days Diet Tracking Feature Was Used in App

Percent of days participants used the diet tracking feature in the WW app during the intervention to track their daily food intake. A day of use will be defined as a day where participants tracked any food item in the WW app.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramPercent of Days Diet Tracking Feature Was Used in App39.1 percent of days of tracking foodStandard Deviation 30.8
Primary

Percent Weight Change From Baseline to 6 Months

Weight is assessed via digital scales provided to participants. Percent weight change will be calculated by subtracting 6 month weight in pounds from baseline weight in pounds, dividing by baseline weight in pounds, and then multiplying this number by 100. Lower values indicated greater weight loss.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramPercent Weight Change From Baseline to 6 Months-5.05 percent weight changeStandard Deviation 5.59
Primary

Weight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 3 Months

Weight will be assessed via digital scales provided to participants. Weight change will be calculated by subtracting weight in pounds at 3 months from baseline weight. Lower values indicate greater weight loss in pounds.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramWeight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 3 Months-8.19 weight in poundsStandard Deviation 7.51
Primary

Weight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 6 Months

Weight will be measured using a smart scale at all assessments. Weight change will be calculated as weight at 6 months in pounds minus baseline weight in pounds. Lower values mean more weight loss.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramWeight Change in Pounds From Baseline to 6 Months-9.72 weight change in poundsStandard Deviation 10.78
Secondary

Change in Fruit Intake Score

At baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruit intake. 1 assessed fruit intake. Change in fruit intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in fruit intake.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChange in Fruit Intake Score.18 scores on scale of 0-5Standard Deviation 0.82
Secondary

Change in Physical Activity

Changes in physical activity will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). The GPAQ has questions assessing activity at work, travel to and from places, and recreational activities. The number of minutes spent on each activity is assigned a METs value to determine level of energy expenditure. The higher the METs value the higher the activity level.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChange in Physical Activity783.95 METsStandard Deviation 3611.88
Secondary

Change in Salad Intake Score

At baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruits and vegetables. 1 assessed salad intake. Change in salad intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in salad intake.

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChange in Salad Intake Score.18 scores on scale of 0-5Standard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Change in Vegetable Intake Score

At baseline and 6 months, participants completed the National Health Interview Survey Five-Factor Screener, which contains 19 items that assess the consumption frequency (measured on a scale ranging from 0=never to 5=≥5 times per day) of different food groups, including fruits and vegetables. 1 assessed vegetable intake. Change in vegetable intake score was calculated by subtracting 6 month values from baseline values. Higher change scores indicate greater increases in vegetable intake.

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChange in Vegetable Intake Score.16 scores on scale of 0-5Standard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change in Well-being

Changes in well-being will be measured using the WHO-5 Well Being Index (0-100 score where higher scores mean greater well-being). Change in well-being was then calculated by subtracting the 6 month score from the baseline score. Higher values indicate increases in well-being over time.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChange in Well-being5.96 score on a 0-100 scaleStandard Deviation 15.36
Secondary

Changes in Food Cravings

Changes in food cravings will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Food Craving Inventory. This inventory includes 28 foods that are scored based on level of craving ranging in answers from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always) for each. A mean is calculated across the 28 items. Scores then would range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5. Higher scores indicate more frequent cravings. Change was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Higher scores indicate greater increases in food cravings.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Food Cravings-.42 mean scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Secondary

Changes in Hunger

Changes in hunger will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Hunger VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). This one-question measure asks How hungry did you feel over the past week and is composed of a slider with words anchored at each end describing the extremes (Not at all hungry, Extremely hungry). Participants rated their hunger over the past week using a slider on a visual analog scale ranging from 0=not at all hungry to 100=extremely hungry. Change in hunger was then calculated by subtracting the hunger score at 6 months from the hunger score at baseline. Higher values indicate increases in hunger over time and lower values indicate decreases in hunger over time.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Hunger-13.02 score on a 0-100 scaleStandard Deviation 22.23
Secondary

Changes in Positive Behavioral Automaticity

Changes in behavioral automaticity will be measured using the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index (SRBAI). This 4-item measure assesses whether Behavior X is something... I do automatically, I do without having to consciously remember, I do without thinking, and I start doing before I realize I'm doing it. Items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A mean score was calculated for each behavior. Then, mean scores were calculated for the 7 healthy behaviors to produce a positive behavioral automaticity score which could range from 1 to 7. Change in positive behavioral automaticity was then calculated by subtracting the 6 month value from the baseline value. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral automaticity for healthy behaviors.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Positive Behavioral Automaticity.86 score on a scale of 1-7Standard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Changes in Quality of Life

Changes in weight related quality of life will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite. This is a 31-item measure assessing physical function (11 items), self-esteem (7 items), sexual life (4 items), public distress (5 items), and work (4 items). Scores range from 0-100, with 100 representing the best quality of life. Change was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Higher values indicate greater increases in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Quality of Life6.63 score on scale of 0-100Standard Deviation 11.51
Secondary

Changes in Self-Compassion

Changes in self-compassion will be measured using the Self-Compassion Scale. This is a 26-item measure of self-compassion that consists of six subscales: self-kindness, self-judgement, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identified. Items were rated a scale ranging from 1=almost never to 5=almost always. Subscales are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. A total self-compassion score can be obtained by reverse scoring the negative subscale items (self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification) and computing a grand mean of all six subscale means. The total possible scores range from 1-5. Then to calculate change in self-compassion, we subtracted the 6 month value from the baseline value. Higher scores mean greater increases in self-compassion over time.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Self-Compassion.09 score on a scale from 1-5Standard Deviation 0.56
Secondary

Changes in Sleep Quality

Changes in sleep quality will be measured from baseline to 6-months using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. This measure contains 10 items to assess sleep quality with a score possible score of 0 - 21. Lower scores represent better the sleep quality (\< 5 is associated with good sleep quality; \> 5 is associated with poor sleep quality. Change in sleep quality was calculated by subtracting 6 month scores from baseline scores. Lower values indicate improvements in sleep quality.

Time frame: Baseline to 6-months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lifestyle Modification ProgramChanges in Sleep Quality-.56 score on a 0-21 scaleStandard Deviation 2.56

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026