Skip to content

Traction Orthosis for Oblique Proximal Phalangeal Fractures

A Non-Invasive and Low-Profile Dynamic Traction Orthosis for Oblique Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Case Series

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04298385
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-03-06
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Finger Fracture, Fractures, Bone, Trauma

Brief summary

The term Ligamentotaxis is used to define the method of distal traction to realign joint surfaces and reduce articular fragments after complex fractures. Traction and mobilization can be combined to help deliver the best outcome. This study will present a dynamic traction orthosis design with the aim that it is easy-to-make, non-invasive, low-profile and allow for ease in performing active and passive exercises. The clinical effectiveness of this method will be examined by analyzing treatment outcomes in a case series cohort.

Detailed description

The term Ligamentotaxis is used to define the method of distal traction to realign joint surfaces and reduce articular fragments after complex fractures. In the management of complex finger fractures, ligamentotaxis has been used to favourably help fracture alignment and reduction, range of movement (ROM), pain, grip and function. Traction has been applied via nail anchors skin traction and Kirschner wires. Phalangeal fractures are at risk of chronic stiffness when immobilised. Early mobilization seeks to achieve the best outcome for the patient as it will aid healing, promote cartilage regeneration, help prevent adhesions and optimize range of movement. Mobilisation of phalangeal fractures as soon as possible after open reduction internal fixation has shown to produce greater total range of movement at six weeks post-operatively. Traction and mobilization can be combined to help deliver the best outcome however dynamic traction orthoses tend to be high-profile. This can cause difficulties in activities of daily living and can be perceived negatively by users. Most dynamic traction orthoses use Kirschner wires which have the potential complication of loosening and pin site infection. Two methods report good outcomes using the less invasive and less expensive means of tape and nail traction respectively. The Early Active Vector Adjustable Skin Traction (EAVAST) orthosis has no reported issues using adhesive tape though the patient is required to remove the orthosis to perform exercises. This removes any stability offered by the orthosis during the early phases of healing. The Poole traction orthosis is well-established in some centres with reported good outcomes however nail traction has the potential complication of nail bed haematoma or nail avulsion. A recent orthosis design by the Chief Investigator aspired to be non-invasive, low-profile and allow for ease when performing exercises. However, this design may be deemed too time consuming to make, particularly for the inexperienced therapist in a busy clinic. This study will present a further iteration of the dynamic traction orthosis with the aim that it is easy-to-make, non-invasive, low-profile and allow for ease in performing active and passive exercises. The clinical effectiveness of this method will be examined by analyzing treatment outcomes in a case series cohort. The new orthosis design will be easy to fabricate and can be produced with common materials and tools in a hand therapy clinic. It offers a non-invasive approach to dynamic traction and simultaneously is easy to perform a variety of tendon glides and active and passive exercises. It also reduces the risk associated with nail traction and pinning. It is low-profile ensuring range of motion is maintained in non-affected joints and helps participation in activities of daily living. The proposed case series will illustrate this method and explore its clinical application by presenting outcomes. Though a recent scoping review reports that research addressing traction orthoses and constructs consists of primarily low-quality studies and no consensus on the their effect on different fracture classifications, this small study will act as a feasibility study to assess the orthosis design with a focus on displaced oblique proximal phalangeal fractures or potentially unstable oblique proximally phalangeal fractures

Interventions

OTHERTraction orthosis

Traction applied to a finger using elastic thread and sports tape and attached to an orthosis

Sponsors

Southern Health and Social Care Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 18 years and over who are able to provide informed consent and independently comply with the orthosis and exercise regime * A recent oblique proximal phalangeal fracture that is displaced or has the potential to become unstable. The decision for trial of a dynamic traction orthosis must be made by the orthopaedic surgeon * No history of trauma or disease to the affected hand

Exclusion criteria

* A fracture which is more than 10 days from injury * An open wound around the affected digit * A history of allergic reactions to plasters * Eczema or dermatitis to the affected hand * The presence of sensory loss to the affected digit * Ligament or tendon injury that will contra-indicate early mobilisation * Transverse proximal phalanx fractures * A tattoo to the affected hand that may prevent anonymity when producing photographs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motionup to three months post interventionGoniometer: Measures in degrees range of movement of a joint
Pain and functionup to three months post interventionPatient Related Wrist Hand Evaluation: a Likert scale that measure pain and function on a total score of 0-100
Gripup to three months post interventionDynamometer: measure hand grip in Ibs and can be compared to normative data

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026