Skip to content

Phenotypes, Biomarkers and Pathophysiology in Spastic Ataxias

Phenotypes, Biomarkers and Pathophysiology in Spastic Ataxias

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04297891
Acronym
SPAX-PBP
Enrollment
250
Registered
2020-03-06
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2022-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spastic Ataxia

Keywords

Spastic Ataxia, Biomarker, Genetic etiology, Molecular mechanisms, Natural History Study

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical spectrum and natural progression of Spastic Ataxias (SPAX) and related disorders in a prospective multicenter natural history study, identify digital, imaging and molecular biomarkers that can assist in diagnosis and therapy development and study the genetic etiology and molecular mechanisms of these diseases.

Detailed description

The investigators will perform a registry-based standardized prospective Natural History Study (NHS) in SPAX and related disorders. Participants will be seen annually. At study visits a standardized clinical examination will be performed including application of clinical rating scales (selection of rating scales may vary depending on the individual phenotype and specific genotype); data will be entered into a clinical database (HSP Registry; https://www.hsp-registry.net and ARCA Registry; www.ARCA-registry.org). At all study visits, patients will be asked to donate biosamples; biomaterial collection is optional and participants can elect to participate in sampling of blood, urine, CSF, and/or a skin biopsy. Optionally, additional examinations may be performed including imaging, quantitative movement analysis, neuropsychological examinations, analysis of patient or observer reported outcomes and OMICS analysis to characterize molecular biomarkers. In participants without a genetic diagnosis, next generation sequencing may be performed. Thus this study will establish a model of disease progression and mechanistic evolution in SPAX, which will allow to track and understand selective as well as overlapping dysfunction of the cerebellum and corticospinal tract. In a transatlantic natural history study we will longitudinally validate clinician- and patient-reported, digital and molecular outcomes. In addition, we will improve on existing and develop new outcome parameters that show superior sensitivity to change. These include a novel clinical SPAX composite score, a smartphone mHealth toolbox combining remote assessment of daily living by wearable sensors with app-based patient-entered outcomes (SPAX.app), and multimodal MRI radiomics with an innovative machine learning approach for multisite MRI analysis, including in particular the infratentorial space. Longitudinal validation of targeted fluid biomarker candidates will aslo be an important part.

Interventions

SARA is a clinical scale developed by Schmitz-Hübsch et al which assesses a range of different impairments in cerebellar ataxia. The scale is made up of 8 items related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin test.

OTHERClinical rating scale to measure spastic paraplegia disease severity and progression

A 13-item scale to rate functional impairment occurring in pure forms of spastic paraplegia (SP). Additional symptoms constituting a complicated form of SP are recorded in an inventory.

OTHERDisease-specific severity index for adults with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS)

The DSI-ARSACS is a valid measure of disease severity for the adult ARSACS population that is able to distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. It considers the 3 components (pyramidal, cerebellar, neuropathic) of the disease, and documents its content validity, internal consistency, and construct validity.

Whole Genome Sequencing, Whole Exome Sequencing, Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics

Sponsors

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
CollaboratorOTHER
German Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Dr. Rebecca Schule
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ARSACS cohort: genetic diagnosis of ARSACS and clinically manifest disease * SPG7 cohort: genetic diagnosis of SPG7 and clinically manifest disease * Unrelated healthy controls: no signs or history of neurological or psychiatric disease AND * written informed consent provided AND * Participants are willing and able to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Missing informed consent * For controls: evidence of a neurodegenerative disease or movement disorders; inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) from baseline to 2-year follow-up24 monthsSeverity of the ataxia component of the disease will be assessed by application of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). The total score is calculated as the sum of al items, yielding a total score between 0 and 38. Hereby, higher SARA scores indicate more severe disease.
Change of Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) from baseline to 2-year follow-up24 monthsSeverity of the spasticity component of the disease will be assessed by application of the Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale. The total score is calculated as the sum of al items, yielding a total score between 0 and 52. Hereby, higher SPRS scores indicate more severe disease.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Disease severity index - Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay(DSI-ARSACS) from baseline to 2-year follow-up24 monthsThe DSI-ARSACS is a clinical rating scale consisting of 8 items reflecting the 3 main components of the disease (pyramidal, cerebellar, and neuropath systems) specifically developed to measure disease progression in ARSACs. The DSI-ARSACS total score can range from 0 to 38. Hereby, higher DSI-ARSACS scores indicate more severe disease.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form physical function 12a from baseline to 2-year follow-up24 monthsSelf-report questionnaire comprising 12 questions. All PROMIS scores are standardized (item-level calibration) and expressed as T-scores with a population mean of 50 and a Standard Deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-scores hereby indicate a higher physical function level.
Change of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form social roles and activities 8a from baseline to 2-year follow-up24 monthsSelf-report questionnaire comprising 8 questions. All PROMIS scores are standardized (item-level calibration) and expressed as T-scores with a population mean of 50 and a Standard Deviation (SD) of 10. Higher T-scores hereby indicate a higher degree of social participation.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactRebecca Schüle, PD Dr.
rebecca.schuele-freyer@uni-tuebingen.de+49 7071 29
Backup ContactMatthis Synofzik, Prof., Dr.
matthis.synofzik@uni-tuebingen.de+49 7071 29

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026