Skip to content

Different Regimens in Influenza Postexposure Chemoprophylaxis in Children

Efficacy of Different Regimens in Influenza Postexposure Chemoprophylaxis With Oral Neuraminidase Inhibitor in Children

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04297462
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-03-05
Start date
2016-11-17
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exposure, Influenza, Prevention

Keywords

influenza, chemoprevention, oseltamivir, child, infant

Brief summary

Although the vaccination is the preferred method of influenza prevention, there are some occasions on which a postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) is required. Two neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) may be used in chemoprophylaxis in children: oral oseltamivir, and inhaled zanamivir. Both, oseltamivir and zanamivir, are effective in treatment and in prophylaxis of influenza, and the efficacy is calculated to reach 70-90%. Oseltamivir is used more frequently, since zanamivir is licensed in older children (5 years of age and above), and children under the age of 5 years are at higher risk of influenza complications. Oseltamivir use correlated in children with higher risk of vomiting, with no increased risk of other adverse events, including those observed in adult patients (nausea, renal events, and psychiatric effects). The PEP may be indicated by individual patient's characteristics (e.g. patients in high-risk group) or epidemiological reasons, i.e. prevention of institutional outbreaks.The one research that analyzed efficacy of 3-days PEP versus 7 or 10-days and showed overall efficacy of shorter oseltamivir prophylaxis to be high and comparable to that of longer regimens. The study included several pediatric patients and made the investigators perform such an analysis in pediatric population. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and costs of 3 versus 7-days prophylaxis with oral oseltamivir in children hospitalized. The hypothesis is that 3-days duration of PEP is not less effective than 7-days PEP, and patients might gain from lower number of adverse reactions related to drug administration.

Detailed description

Only applies to patients hospitalized due to other than influenza reasons. If a proven contact with influenza has taken place (influenza diagnosed by signs/symptoms and positive rapid influenza diagnostic test and/or PCR), a patient may be enrolled.

Interventions

DRUGOseltamivir 3 days

Non-inferiority study of 3 versus 7-days duration of PEP

DRUGOseltamivir 7 days

Active comparator

Sponsors

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients randomly allocated into 3 or 7-days postexposure chemoprophylaxis group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients hospitalized at the Pediatric Ward * age: 0-18 years old * confirmed contact with a person diagnosed with influenza * patient's, patient's parent/tutor's informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* lack of an informed consent * more than 48 hours after the first contact with influenza * severe adverse reaction to the drug- discontinuation of the prophylaxis * important to a parent/tutor drug intolerance (e.g. lack of tolerance of a drug's taste) * new contact with influenza after chemoprophylaxis has finished

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postexposure chemoprophylaxis efficacyup to 7 days after PEP has finishedPercent of patients who did not have influenza in each study arm.
Oseltamivir safetyup to 7 days after PEP has finishedPresence of the following adverse reactions to drug (in percents): nausea, vomiting, skin hypersensitivity (including rash), sleep disorders, consciousness disorders, convulsions, fever related to drug administration, symptomatic arrhythmias, behavioral changes
Postexposure chemoprophylaxis costsup to 7 days after PEP has finishedCost of drugs used in each arm, costs of treatment of adverse reactions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for hospitalization in case of influenza after failed chemoprophylaxisUp to 28 daysA need for hospitalization if influenza is present within 7 days after PEP completion
Fever in case of influenza after failed chemoprophylaxisUp to 28 daysHighest fever and duration of fever
Duration of influenza signs and symptoms after failed chemoprophylaxisUp to 28 daysLength of period when signs and symptoms are present
Presence of complications in case of influenza after failed chemoprophylaxisUp to 28 daysPresence of influenza complications: pneumonia, bronchitis, otitis media, need for antibiotic treatment, neurological sequelae, ICU transfer, death

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactAugust E. Wrotek, MD, PhD
august.wrotek@bielanski.med.pl(+48)228641167

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026