Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided Two Different Type Blocks for Pain Relief in Totalabdominal Hysterectomy

Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block as Preventive Analgesia in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy With Pfannenstiel Incision: a Prospective, Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04297046
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-03-05
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2020-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ultrasonography

Keywords

Nerve block, analgesia, pain management

Brief summary

Effective analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy is important for faster recovery and preventing complications which depend to pain. A multimodal and preventive approach is preferred to ensure adequate analgesia and to avoid side effects due to high doses of analgesics. The hypothesis was that the Quadratus Lumborum block (application of local anesthetics to the side of the abdomen) would be superior to Transversus Abdominis Plane block (application of local anesthetics in front of the abdomen) for analgesia before abdominal incision in total abdominal hysterectomy. The primary goal of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block and Quadratus Lumborum block. The secondary goal was to evaluate postoperative adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

Detailed description

The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study was carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was conducted between April 2017 - July 2017 with a prospective, randomized, double-blind design on 62 patients who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy with Pfannenstiel incision. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) II-III, patients between the ages of 18-75 were included in the study. The participants with bleeding diathesis, those who could not communicate (mental disorder, language problem, etc.), those with allergies to the drugs used, those who did not wish to participate in the study, and those who had an infection in the block area were excluded from the study. The participants were divided into 2 groups with the sealed envelope technique preoperatively Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Procedure Before the surgical procedure, the muscles were screened at the umbilicus plain/mid-axillary line with the ultrasound using a linear probe while the participants in the supine position. The skin, subcutaneous adipose tissue, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle, and peritoneum were visualized. The block needle was advanced in the posterolateral direction with the in-plain approach. 0.3 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally into the space between the internal oblique muscle and the transversus abdominis muscle. Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Procedure Quadratus lumborum muscle could be recognized with ultrasound via the convex probe was transversally attached above iliac crest at the midaxillary line while the patients were in the lateral decubitus position. The point of injection with a block needle in transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block is between the anterior border of Quadratus lumborum muscle and psoas major muscles. A transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block was performed bilaterally with 0,3 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine solution injection on each side.

Interventions

Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia was used for postoperative pain control with a bolus dose of 25 mg Tramadol and a lockout interval of 20 min. The pain was evaluated at different times after the operation, both at rest and movement (Dynamic VAS) at the 0., 2., 6., 12. hours and 24h later. All patients received 1 g iv paracetamol 8 hourly intervals regularly. 75 mg im diclofenac sodium was given as rescue analgesic.

Sponsors

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

After general anesthesia was given to the participant, the blocks were made. The participant did not know the type of block made to him.The outcomes assessor evaluating the participants after the surgery does not know the type of block made to the patients.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergone total abdominal hysterectomy with Pfannenstiel incision * American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-III * Patients between the ages of 18-65

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with bleeding diathesis * Patients who could not communicate (mental disorder, language problem, etc.) * Patients with allergies to the drugs used * Patients who did not wish to participate in the study * Patients who had an infection in the block area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
iv PCA tramadol consumption24 hourstramadol consumption up to 24 hours
intraoperatively fentanyl useduring operationTotal intraoperative fentanyl dose
The Visual analogue Scale (VAS)24 hoursThe Visual Analogue Scale was used to measure the severity of postoperative pain (0= No pain, 10= The worst possible pain) up to 24 hours. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative adverse effects24 hoursnausea,vomiting, hypertension and hypotension incidences
patient and surgeon satisfaction: scores24 hoursThe patient and surgeon satisfaction score (0= Not satisfied, 4= Very satisfied) were recorded. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026