Skip to content

A Study Based on Data From German Sick Funds That Looks at the Costs of Treatment of Type-2 Diabetic Patients With Empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 Inhibitors vs. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

The Empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Cost of Care Study: a German Claims Data Analysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04295005
Enrollment
24500
Registered
2020-03-04
Start date
2020-11-16
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2024-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

Empagliflozin vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RA) Cost of Care Study: a German claims data analysis

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin

film coated tablet

DRUGDPP-4i

film coated tablets, specifically Sitagliptin

DRUGGLP-1-RA

subcutaneous injection or tablet

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Continuous insurance by the sickness fund for the entire period (01/01/2014 - 31/12/2018; death of a patient is the only accepted exception from this rule) * At least two outpatient T2DM diagnoses (ICD E11.-) in two different quarters and/or at least one inpatient T2DM diagnosis (ICD E11.-) in the period 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2016, but before or on index date (i.e. first Empagliflozin or DPP-4i /Sitagliptin prescription). * At least one prescription of Empagliflozin or a DPP-4i /Sitagliptin in the inclusion period (01/01/2015 - 31/12/2016)

Exclusion criteria

* At least one prescription of a sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i), DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA in the baseline period (01/01/2014 - 31/12/2014) * During follow-up, patients will be censored if they switch to any SGLT-2i, DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA or initiate a concomitant use of any SGLT-2i, DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA (free or fixed-dose combinations).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Direct Healthcare CostDataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.The direct healthcare cost is reported, including inpatient cost, outpatient cost, medication cost, and total cost. Patients starting Empagliflozin (EMPA) versus either Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), Sitagliptin (SITA) or Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) were matched 1:1 based on a propensity score using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm without replacement and a maximum caliper of 0.001. The propensity scores were derived by logistic regression models estimating the probability of a patient belonging to the different treatment groups (three estimations: EMPA versus DPP-4i, EMPA versus SITA, and EMPA versus GLP-1-RA). The cost per observed patient year is calculated as the sum of the cost/ sum of the observed time \[year\] over all patients. Final values were rounded to the nearest digit.
Healthcare Resource UtilizationDataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.Healthcare resource utilization includes hospitalizations, hospital stays. outpatient visits, and rehabilitation stays.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Indirect Healthcare Costs (Including Indirect Costs of Days Absent From Work)Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.Indirect healthcare costs (including indirect costs of days absent from work) includes indirect costs for hospitalization, outpatient visits, absent from work, and rehabilitation stays.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This retrospective study was to compare healthcare cost associated with different antidiabetic drug treatments among the incident users of Empagliflozin (EMPA), any Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) (specifically Sitagliptin) or any Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA), based on data covering 2015 - 2018 from Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects who strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Patients Who Started an Empagliflozin Therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Empagliflozin (EMPA) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
3,285
All Patients Who Started a DPP-4 Inhibitor (Specifically Sitagliptin) Therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor (DPP-4i) (specifically Sitagliptin) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
19,433
All Patients Who Started a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
1,747
Total24,465

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Patients Who Started an Empagliflozin TherapyAll Patients Who Started a DPP-4 Inhibitor (Specifically Sitagliptin) TherapyAll Patients Who Started a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous60.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1110 Participants7705 Participants754 Participants9569 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2175 Participants11728 Participants993 Participants14896 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Direct Healthcare Cost

The direct healthcare cost is reported, including inpatient cost, outpatient cost, medication cost, and total cost. Patients starting Empagliflozin (EMPA) versus either Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), Sitagliptin (SITA) or Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) were matched 1:1 based on a propensity score using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm without replacement and a maximum caliper of 0.001. The propensity scores were derived by logistic regression models estimating the probability of a patient belonging to the different treatment groups (three estimations: EMPA versus DPP-4i, EMPA versus SITA, and EMPA versus GLP-1-RA). The cost per observed patient year is calculated as the sum of the cost/ sum of the observed time \[year\] over all patients. Final values were rounded to the nearest digit.

Time frame: Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.

Population: All eligible participants in this study, with non-missing outcome measures, and matched via propensity score adjusting for potential differences in patient characteristics and prior disease and treatment history among cohorts. The Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) group and the Sitagliptin group are not mutually exclusive.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Empagliflozin (Matched to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i))Direct Healthcare CostTotal4247 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i))Direct Healthcare CostMedication1966 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i))Direct Healthcare CostInpatient1455 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i))Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient853 Euro / patient-year
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostInpatient3040 Euro / patient-year
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient1280 Euro / patient-year
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostTotal7009 Euro / patient-year
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostMedication2689 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Sitagliptin (SITA))Direct Healthcare CostTotal4319 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Sitagliptin (SITA))Direct Healthcare CostInpatient1486 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Sitagliptin (SITA))Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient863 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Sitagliptin (SITA))Direct Healthcare CostMedication1970 Euro / patient-year
Sitagliptin (SITA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostMedication2516 Euro / patient-year
Sitagliptin (SITA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostTotal6535 Euro / patient-year
Sitagliptin (SITA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostInpatient2806 Euro / patient-year
Sitagliptin (SITA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient1213 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA))Direct Healthcare CostTotal4895 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA))Direct Healthcare CostMedication2433 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA))Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient917 Euro / patient-year
Empagliflozin (Matched to Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA))Direct Healthcare CostInpatient1546 Euro / patient-year
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostMedication3575 Euro / patient-year
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostTotal6851 Euro / patient-year
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostInpatient2094 Euro / patient-year
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1-RA) (Matched)Direct Healthcare CostOutpatient1181 Euro / patient-year
Comparison: Total cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Total cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Total cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Inpatient cost comparisonp-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Inpatient cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Inpatient cost comparisonp-value: 0.126Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Outpatient cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Outpatient cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Outpatient cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Medication cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Medication cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Comparison: Medication cost comparison.p-value: <0.001Bang and Tsiatis
Primary

Healthcare Resource Utilization

Healthcare resource utilization includes hospitalizations, hospital stays. outpatient visits, and rehabilitation stays.

Time frame: Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.

Population: Relevant data for the outcome measure were not collected in the GMQ dataset because GWQ´s quality assurance decided not to integrate several sub-datasets into GWQ´s dataset due to heterogeneity and low coding-quality of out-patient diagnoses and high variability in size, structure, and quality of specific items in individual sickness funds data.

Secondary

Indirect Healthcare Costs (Including Indirect Costs of Days Absent From Work)

Indirect healthcare costs (including indirect costs of days absent from work) includes indirect costs for hospitalization, outpatient visits, absent from work, and rehabilitation stays.

Time frame: Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.

Population: Relevant data for the outcome measure were not collected in the GMQ dataset because GWQ´s quality assurance decided not to integrate several sub-datasets into GWQ´s dataset due to heterogeneity and low coding-quality of out-patient diagnoses and high variability in size, structure, and quality of specific items in individual sickness funds data.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026