Skip to content

Post-market Study of the Biodesign Hernia Graft

Post-market Study of the Biodesign® Hernia Graft

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04294446
Enrollment
74
Registered
2020-03-04
Start date
2020-11-10
Completion date
2024-11-26
Last updated
2026-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to collect data on the performance of the Biodesign® Hernia Graft when used to reinforce soft tissues during ventral hernia repair.

Detailed description

This multicenter, open-label, prospective clinical study will evaluate the performance of the Biodesign Hernia Graft to reinforce soft tissues during ventral hernia repair. This post-market study will enroll up to 95 patients at up to 10 clinical sites. Each clinical site will be limited to a maximum of 50 patients to ensure a variety of patients and surgical techniques are represented. There is no minimum enrollment number per site. This study has been designed as a multicenter, open-label, prospective study to collect data on the performance of the Biodesign Hernia Graft. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study have been selected based on the instructions outlined in the IFU so that the results from this study can provide data on the real-world use of the device.

Interventions

DEVICEBiodesign Hernia Graft

The Biodesign Hernia Graft is comprised of 8 layers of decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) that has been pressed-lyophilized (i.e., freeze-dried under vacuum pressure) to laminate the component sheets (i.e., layers) together. In addition, it is perforated and sewn with 4-0 Trisorb suture (polyglycolic acid (PGA); Samyang Corporation, Seoul, South Korea). The suture is distributed in a diamond pattern across the graft and along the periphery and is intended to mitigate delamination of the layers upon rehydration and/or manipulation during implantation. Being a completely biologic device, the Biodesign Hernia Graft is considered MR safe.

Sponsors

Cook Biotech Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1\. Primary or recurrent ventral hernia in need of surgical repair utilizing a Biodesign Hernia Graft

Exclusion criteria

1. Known sensitivity to porcine material For the study, the following patients will also be excluded: 2. Age \< 18 years 3. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent 4. Life expectancy of less than one year from the date of the index procedure 5. Patients will be excluded from the study if they never receive a Biodesign Hernia Graft during their index procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hernia Recurrence1-yearHernia recurrence through 1-year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device-, Procedure-, and Hernia-related Adverse Event Rates2-yearSummarize the adverse event rates for normal commercial use of the device (e.g., seroma and infection rates)
Hernia Recurrence Rate Through 2-year Follow-up2-yearAssess the long-term success of the device in the reinforcement of hernia repairs through 2-year follow-up
Operative TimesDuring operationWhat was the operation time for the ventral hernia repair for patients who had a follow-up at least 1 month after procedure.
Hospital Stays for Serious Adverse Events2-yearNumber of patients with serious adverse events that required a hospital stay
Hospitalization Times for Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From date of hospitalization for SAE. Patients were followed up to 2 years.Hospitalization times for patients with related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). For patients who were followed up to 2 years after procedure.
Patient-reported Quality of Life: Yes/No2-yearPatient-reported quality of life assessed by completion of a questionaire
Patient Reported Quality of Life-Pain Questions2-year follow-upPatient reported quality of life related to pain
Patient Reported Quality of Life-abdominal Wall2-year follow-uppatient reported quality of life related to abdominal wall

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

21 patients that were consented failed the screen.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Number of patients with hernia47 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 47

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026