Skip to content

Comparison of Transdermal Fentanyl and Morphine for Oral Mucositis Pain in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients

A Comparison of Oral Controlled-release Morphine With Transdermal Fentanyl in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients With Moderate or Severe Oral Mucositis Pain Induced by Chemoradiotherapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04292990
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-03-03
Start date
2020-12-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Pain, Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to explore the significance of analgesic treatment for radiation-induced oral mucositis pain in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy, and to compare the analgesic effect of morphine controlled-release tablets with that of fentanyl transdermal patch. Half of participants will receive morphine controlled-release tablets,while the other half will receive fentanyl transdermal patch.

Detailed description

Morphine controlled-release tablets and fentanyl transdermal patch each relieve radiation-induced oral mucositis pain in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. But they do so by different mechanisms and in different effects. Morphine is a classic strong analgesic, which has been widely used in patients with advanced cancer pain. It has achieved satisfactory results in pain control, sleep improvement and quality of life. Oral morphine has been regarded as the standard treatment for moderate and severe cancer pain. Fentanyl transdermal patch is a system device for transdermal delivery of drugs. It is compressed on a film containing fentanyl memory. The film can continuously release fentanyl into the blood circulation and maintain stable for more than 72 hours. It is not affected by gastrointestinal PH or food, and it has no hepatic frst-pass effect, with a bioavailability of up to 92%. This study will test the efficacy and safety of morphine controlled-release tablets compared to fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of pain in patients with radiation-induced oral mucositis.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl

Patch releasing drug at the rate of 25 µg/hour, increasing by 25 µg/hour increments to maintain the NRS score≤3 after the frst 24 hours according to no change in pain control. The maximum dose allowed in this study is 300 µg/hour.

DRUGMorphine

Tablets taken orally, twice daily, morning & evening with preferably 12 hours (not less than 6 hours) between doses. Titration phase: starting at 30 mg, increasing at a minimum of 3 days intervals by 20 mg, with a maximum dose of 100 mg. Maintenance phase: continuing on dose level established in titration phase.

Sponsors

Jiarong Chen, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients were pathologically newly diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and had no previous history of other tumors * According to the treatment strategies of doctors, patients need to receive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (for example, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy) or targeted therapy * Never use a opioid before treatment * Hematology: WBC≥4.0×109/L, ANC≥1.5×109/L, PLT≥100×109/L,Hb≥90g/L. * Participants with the ability to assess the pain level * Willingness to return to enrolling institution for follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Patients do not conform to the inclusion criteria * Known allergy to fentanyl, morphine, or any known component of the drug formulation * Refuse to use of opioid drugs * Nasopharyngeal patients with mental illness * Current untreated or unresolved oral candidiasis or oral HSV infection * Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens * Pregnant or Nursing women * Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception * Other contraindications or unsuitable conditions for radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity MeasureThrough chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeksSelf reported pain intensity once a day according to the numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0-10(0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as can be). The higher scores indicate worse pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse EventsThrough chemoradiotherapy completion, 3 weeksAll adverse events were recorded during treatment, and the skin was examined for local reactions during treatment and after removal of fentanyl transdermal patch.
Quality-of-Life composite IndexThrough chemoradiotherapy completion, an average of 2 weeksQuality-of-Life was assessed using Karnofsky performance status (KPS) standards of the Union for International Cancer Control and SPAASMS (Score for pain, Physical activity levels, Additional pain medication, Additional physician/emergency room visits, Sleep, Mood, and Side effects) scores before and after 3 days of treatment. The higher KPS scores(0-100) of patients indicate better quality of life, but the higher SPAASMS scores(0-31) mean worse outcome.

Contacts

Primary ContactJiarong Chen, PhD
garwingchan@163.com86-0750-3399003
Backup ContactYanghao Ruan
ruanyanghao@126.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026