Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in Participants With Moderate Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Compared to Standard of Care Treatment

A Phase 3 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) in Participants With Moderate COVID-19 Compared to Standard of Care Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04292730
Enrollment
1113
Registered
2020-03-03
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2021-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 remdesivir (RDV) regimens compared to standard of care (SOC), with respect to clinical status assessed by a 7-point ordinal scale on Day 11.

Interventions

DRUGRemdesivir

Administered as an intravenous infusion

DRUGStandard of Care

Standard of Care Treatment for COVID-19 Infection

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to performing study procedures (participants ≥ 18 years of age) or assent (participants ≥ 12 and \< 18 years of age) prior to performing study procedures. For participants ≥ 12 and \< 18 years of age, a parent or legal guardian willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to performing study procedures * Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test ≤ 4 days before randomization * Currently hospitalized and requiring medical care for COVID-19 * Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) \> 94% on room air at screening * Radiographic evidence of pulmonary infiltrates Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in any other clinical trial of an experimental treatment for COVID-19 * Concurrent treatment or planned concurrent treatment with other agents with actual or possible direct acting antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 * Requiring mechanical ventilation at screening * Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 5 X upper limit of normal (ULN) * Creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault formula for participants ≥ 18 years of age {Cockcroft 1976} and Schwartz Formula for participants \< 18 years of age Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Day 11Clinical status was derived from death, hospital discharge, and ordinal scale as follows: score of 1 was used for all days on or after the date of death; score of 7 was used for all days on or after discharged alive date; last available assessment for missing value. The scale is as follows: 1. Death; 2. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO); 3. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4. Hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen; 5. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (coronavirus (COVID-19) related or otherwise); 6. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care (other than per protocol remdesivir administration; 7. Not hospitalized. The odds ratio represents the odds of improvement in the ordinal scale for a RDV group relative to the SOC group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)First dose date up to last dose date (maximum: 10 days) plus 30 daysTEAEs were defined as the following: any AE with an onset date on or after the study treatment start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study treatment and/or any AE leading to premature discontinuation of study treatment. For participants randomized to the SOC group, all AEs reported on or after the protocol-specified Day 1 visit were considered as treatment emergent.

Countries

China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The first participant was screened on 15 March 2020. The last study visit occurred on 26 June 2020.

Pre-assignment details

1138 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 Days
Participants received continued SOC therapy together with IV RDV 200 mg on Day 1 followed by IV RDV 100 mg on Days 2-5.
191
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 Days
Participants received continued SOC therapy together with IV RDV 200 mg on Day 1 followed by IV RDV 100 mg on Days 2-10.
193
Part A: SOC Therapy
Participants received continued SOC therapy.
200
Part B: Extension Treatment, Remdesivir for 10 Days
Participants received continued SOC therapy together with IV RDV 200 mg on Day 1 followed by IV RDV 100 mg on Days 2-10.
503
Total1,087

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath22412
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8121248
Overall StudyNon-Compliance with Study Drug0100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0010
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated84014
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent2256

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: SOC TherapyPart B: Extension Treatment, Remdesivir for 10 DaysTotalPart A: Remdesivir for 5 Days
Age, Customized
Age, Categorical
< 65 Years
141 Participants142 Participants351 Participants776 Participants142 Participants
Age, Customized
Age, Categorical
>= 65 Years
52 Participants58 Participants152 Participants311 Participants49 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants34 Participants156 Participants257 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
144 Participants152 Participants325 Participants783 Participants162 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Not Permitted
7 Participants13 Participants22 Participants46 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
31 Participants37 Participants61 Participants163 Participants34 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
37 Participants27 Participants107 Participants206 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Permitted
5 Participants7 Participants21 Participants38 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
12 Participants15 Participants50 Participants82 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
107 Participants112 Participants260 Participants588 Participants109 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
6 Participants8 Participants13 Participants35 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
11 Participants7 Participants1 Participants28 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
23 Participants26 Participants54 Participants133 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
6 Participants9 Participants14 Participants32 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
4 Participants10 Participants16 Participants37 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
28 Participants31 Participants44 Participants140 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
5 Participants6 Participants3 Participants18 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
9 Participants17 Participants27 Participants60 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
99 Participants85 Participants318 Participants578 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
75 Participants75 Participants221 Participants448 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants125 Participants282 Participants639 Participants114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1913 / 1934 / 20013 / 503
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 19142 / 19330 / 200113 / 503
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 19110 / 19318 / 20040 / 503

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11

Clinical status was derived from death, hospital discharge, and ordinal scale as follows: score of 1 was used for all days on or after the date of death; score of 7 was used for all days on or after discharged alive date; last available assessment for missing value. The scale is as follows: 1. Death; 2. Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO); 3. Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4. Hospitalized, requiring low flow supplemental oxygen; 5. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (coronavirus (COVID-19) related or otherwise); 6. Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer required ongoing medical care (other than per protocol remdesivir administration; 7. Not hospitalized. The odds ratio represents the odds of improvement in the ordinal scale for a RDV group relative to the SOC group.

Time frame: Day 11

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized into Part A of the study and received at least 1 dose of study treatment if randomized to 1 of the RDV treatment groups. Participants in the SOC arm who had protocol Day 1 visit were included in the FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 20.0 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 519.9 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 43.7 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 10.0 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 770.2 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 63.7 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 32.6 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 46.2 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 11.0 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 20.5 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 30.0 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 522.8 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 64.7 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 764.8 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 523.0 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 22.0 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 760.0 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 64.0 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 45.5 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 33.5 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants in Each Clinical Status Category as Assessed by a 7-Point Ordinal Scale on Day 11Score: 12.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Primary analysisp-value: 0.017495% CI: [1.092, 2.483]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Primary analysisp-value: 0.182695% CI: [0.88, 1.952]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: 0.016895% CI: [1.095, 2.497]Proportional odds model
Comparison: Secondary analysisp-value: 0.218695% CI: [0.862, 1.917]Proportional odds model
Secondary

Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs were defined as the following: any AE with an onset date on or after the study treatment start date and no later than 30 days after permanent discontinuation of study treatment and/or any AE leading to premature discontinuation of study treatment. For participants randomized to the SOC group, all AEs reported on or after the protocol-specified Day 1 visit were considered as treatment emergent.

Time frame: First dose date up to last dose date (maximum: 10 days) plus 30 days

Population: Safety Analysis Set included participants who were randomized into part A of the study and received at least 1 dose of study treatment or completed the Day 1 visit (SOC only group).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: Remdesivir for 5 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)51.3 percentage of participants
Part A: Remdesivir for 10 DaysPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)58.5 percentage of participants
Part A: SOC TherapyPart A: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)46.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.363395% CI: [-5.2, 14.7]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.020195% CI: [1.6, 21.8]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026