Skip to content

High Ankle Block in Ankle Fractures

Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing a High Ankle Block to Placebo in Patients Treated for Ankle Pathologies

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04292691
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-03-03
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Ankle Fractures

Keywords

Ankle fracture, Foot block, Perioperative pain management

Brief summary

The aim of the herein presented double-blinded is to compare the effectiveness of the high foot block against placebo infiltration in simple, uni- and bimalleolar ankle fractures. Included will be all adult patients (\>18a) treated surgically at our department. The standard peri-operative procedure at our clinic will no be altered but the additional high ankle block. The intraoperative opioid requirement, the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS) and the postoperative opioid requirement will be assessed and compared between the two groups

Detailed description

Ankle fractures were among the most common injuries of the lower extremity. Peri-operative, multimodal pain therapy is of great importance in the surgical treatment of those injuries. Whereas simple (uni- and bimalleolar) ankle fractures are covered peri-operatively by oral pain medication and Piritramid-PCA (PCA=Patient-controlled analgesia), complex, trimalleolar fractures usually receive additional regional pain catheters (femoralis blockade and ischiadicus blockade). Regional pain catheters have the major downside of motor paresis and are therefore critically discussed. Various studies have explored new techniques for perioperative pain therapy. An established procedure in midfoot and forefoot surgery is the foot block. It can be inserted at different heights around the ankle joint. However, the effectiveness of the high foot block has not yet been investigated for ankle fractures. The aim of the herein presented double-blinded is to compare the effectiveness of the high foot block against placebo infiltration in simple, uni- and bimalleolar ankle fractures. All patients who are operated on in our department due to a uni- or bimalleolar ankle fracture, who are over 18 years of age and have no serious pre-existing conditions or contraindications to local anaesthesia (LA) are eligible for inclusion. The perioperative procedure does not change to the current treatment standard at the University Hospital Munich - Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) except for randomization for high foot block or placebo. Both the anesthesia and the postoperative pain therapy correspond to the current treatment standard and are the same for both groups. The intraoperative opioid requirement, the VAS and the postoperative opioid requirement will be assessed. The data is collected using the RedCap database (#19-177), which has already been reviewed by the ethics committee. The evaluation will be performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM).

Interventions

DRUG40ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

already outlined in the arm/group description

DRUG40ml of Ringer's Lactate

already outlined in the arm/group description

Sponsors

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Randomization will be conducted by the Principle Investigator through RedCap. The syringe is prepared under sterile setting in a separate room by a nurse not involved in any further part of the medical treatment. The syringe with unknown content will be handed to the anaesthesiologist performing the anaesthesia. Therefore the anaesthesiologist performing the block as well as the guiding the anaesthesia throughout the surgery does not know what was injected. The total intraoperative morphine milligram equivalent dose will be automatically drawn from our anaesthesia recording program (NarcoData) and the cumulative morphine milligram equivalent dose use between skin incision and beginning Recovery Room calculated. The patient than receives the Piritramid PCA and the total morphine milligram equivalent dose use will again be drawn automatically from the machine. The VAS Score will be entered by the patient in a tablet.

Intervention model description

Double blinded, randomised control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>17 years and \<71 years * Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \> 60 * American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA) \< 4 * Independently mobile without aids before an accident * Informed consent * Uni- or bimalleolar (medial and lateral malleolus) ankle fractures requiring surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years; \>70 years * GFR \< 60 * ASA \> 3 * Trimalleolar fractures or fractures necessitating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the posterior malleolus * Not able to walk without aids (stick, rollator, etc.) * Allergy to local anesthetics or drugs of the postOP pain regime * Peripheral polyneuropathy * Peripheral artery disease (PAD) grade IV° * Dementia * Depression, anxiety disorders or sleep disorders 18 * Pregnancy * Denial of study participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative morphine milligram equivalent dose during the surgery (skin incision - recovery room)Begin anaesthesia to begin recovery room; the time will vary between 1 and 4 hoursThe morphine equivalent doses will be calculated based on the morphines given throughout the surgery: Begin anaesthesia to begin recovery room Cumulative morphine milligram equivalent dose during the surgery (skin incision - recovery room)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue pain Scale (VAS)Will be collected at arrival at the recovery room and then 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours thereafter. For the further in-house duration,the VAS will be collected at 08:00 and 21:00 o'clock every day for further two daysPostoperative pain measured on a 0-100 Visual Analogue pain Scale (VAS) with 0 meaning no pain and 100 most sever pain imaginable
Postoperative cumulative morphine milligram equivalent doseThe Piritramid PCA will be started in the recovery room and stay with the patient until she or he does not rely on it any more. Usually, the patients keep the PCA for the first two postoperative days.The cumulative morphine milligram equivalent dose will be calculated from the Piritramid PCA. The PCA saves each application date and amount. This data will be gathered at the time, when the patient does not rely on the PCA any more. The Piritramid PCA will be only used in-house.
Rescue medicationThe Piritramid-PCA is provided as long as requested by the patient during his in-house stay. We expect the patient to request rescue medication within the first 24 hours after surgeryTime to first rescue medication. Rescue medication is defined as the first Piritramid application through the PCA system by the patient.

Contacts

Primary ContactSebastian F Baumbach, MD
sebastian.baumbach@med.uni-muenchen.de0049894400519474
Backup ContactHans Polzer, MD
hans.polzer@med.uni-muenchen.de004989440052511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026