Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Combining Intranasal Insulin & Acute Exercise

Placebo Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial: Safety and Efficacy of Combining Intranasal Insulin & Acute Exercise

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04292535
Enrollment
116
Registered
2020-03-03
Start date
2018-06-15
Completion date
2020-02-20
Last updated
2021-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise, Insulin

Keywords

Intranasal Insulin, Cognition, Exercise, Physical Activity

Brief summary

To determine if physical activity engagement alters the dose-response profile and safety of administration of insulin into the intranasal mucosa.

Detailed description

Using a randomized placebo controlled double-blind pre-posttest design, participants will be randomly assigned to receive a dose of either 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, or 120 IU of NovoLog insulin aspart prior to being randomized into participating in a 20 minute session of either moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or a passive control condition. The efficacy of the intranasal insulin for inducing alterations in cognition will be assessed using both behavioral and neuroelectric measures. The safety of the protocol will be assessed using a symptom questionnaire assessing common symptoms of altered blood glucose and common side effects of intranasal insulin.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo into the intranasal mucosa

6 doses of 0.2mL saline solution administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG20 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

5 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 1 dose of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (20 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG40 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

4 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 2 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (40 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG60 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

3 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 3 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (60 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG80 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

2 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 4 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (80 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG100 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

1 dose of 0.2mL saline solution, 5 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (100 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

DRUG120 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa

6 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (120 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer

Sponsors

Michigan State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Double blind, placebo controlled trial

Intervention model description

Random allocation to a dose of intranasal insulin (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120) Within each dose, random allocation to exercise or control activity.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants must be over the age of 18.. 2. Participants must have normal or corrected-to-normal vision in order to complete the cognitive task.

Exclusion criteria

1. Lack of consent. 2. Presence of any major neurological health issues, brain trauma, or concussion with loss of consciousness assessed through a health history and demographics questionnaire. 3. Type I or Type II Diabetes 4. Self-reported pregnancy 5. Currently has any type of inflammation or blockage of the nasal passageways (i.e. allergies or a cold affecting the sinuses).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the ProtocolDuring the 20 minute exercise/control period and the cognitive assessments.The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. Burning/tingling of the nose and watering/tearing of the eyes during the nasal spray were the most cited symptoms.
Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the ProtocolApproximately 1 hour following the dose of intranasal insulin (~32 minutes following the end of the passive control/exercise condition; immediately following the completion of the post-test cognitive assessments)The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. The most cited symptom was having a runny nose.
Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RTPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - AccuracyPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition TaskPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition TaskPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RTPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - AccuracyPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP TaskPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP TaskPrior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes followingThe effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the mid-Michigan area.

Pre-assignment details

177 individuals were assessed for eligibility. 61 individuals were excluded (58 for failing medical screening, 1 diabetic, 1 unable to exercise, 1 history of epilepsy) 116 individuals were randomized using a serial stratification approach.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Passive Control - Placebo
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. Placebo into the intranasal mucosa: 6 doses of 0.2mL saline solution administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Passive Control - 20 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 20 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 5 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 1 dose of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (20 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Passive Control - 40 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 40 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 4 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 2 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (40 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
9
Passive Control - 60 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 60 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 3 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 3 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (60 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Passive Control - 80 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 80 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 2 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 4 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (80 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Passive Control - 100 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 100 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 1 dose of 0.2mL saline solution, 5 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (100 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
9
Passive Control - 120 IU
20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video. 120 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 6 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (120 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Acute Exercise - Placebo
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. Placebo into the intranasal mucosa: 6 doses of 0.2mL saline solution administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
10
Acute Exercise - 20 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 20 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 5 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 1 dose of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (20 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Acute Exercise - 40 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 40 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 4 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 2 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (40 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
8
Acute Exercise - 60 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 60 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 3 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 3 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (60 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
7
Acute Exercise - 80 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 80 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 2 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 4 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (80 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
7
Acute Exercise - 100 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 100 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 1 dose of 0.2mL saline solution, 5 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (100 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
9
Acute Exercise - 120 IU
20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at 60-65% of maximum heart rate. 120 IU NovoLog Insulin aspart into the intranasal mucosa: 6 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (120 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
9
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013
Overall StudyCondition stopped due to Blood Sugar Below 70 mg/dL00000001000011
Overall StudyEquipment Failure00000000000100
Overall StudyReport of Dizziness00000000000001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject00000001000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPassive Control - PlaceboTotalAcute Exercise - 120 IUAcute Exercise - 100 IUAcute Exercise - 80 IUAcute Exercise - 60 IUAcute Exercise - 40 IUAcute Exercise - 20 IUAcute Exercise - PlaceboPassive Control - 120 IUPassive Control - 100 IUPassive Control - 80 IUPassive Control - 60 IUPassive Control - 40 IUPassive Control - 20 IU
Aerobic fitness percentile44.7 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.8
46.9 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
28.8 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
71.8 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.2
55.8 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.2
52.0 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.5
48.7 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.5
45.2 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.7
59.2 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.9
41.7 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.9
53.6 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.3
35.9 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
54.5 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24
68.5 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
26.2 percentile
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Age, Continuous20.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
20.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
20.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
20.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
20.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
21.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
19.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
19.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
20.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
19.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
21.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
20.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
20.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Education14.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
13.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
13.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
13.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
14.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
15.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
13.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
13.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
14.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
13.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
14.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants109 Participants9 Participants9 Participants7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants10 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)94.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
94.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
96.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
92.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
96.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
93.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
87.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
97.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
92.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
97.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
94.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
96.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
91.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
99.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
96.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants9 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants96 Participants8 Participants9 Participants6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants6 Participants8 Participants6 Participants9 Participants6 Participants5 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants116 Participants9 Participants9 Participants7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants8 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants72 Participants5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants44 Participants4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
WASI-II (IQ)104.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
107.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
101.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
108.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
103.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
110.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
107.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
110.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.8
104.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
110.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
120.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
113.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
110.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
98.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
105.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 80 / 100 / 80 / 80 / 70 / 70 / 90 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 81 / 100 / 80 / 80 / 70 / 71 / 92 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 80 / 80 / 90 / 80 / 100 / 80 / 80 / 70 / 70 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.03 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy0.16 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.04 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.19 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.06 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.14 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.05 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy0.05 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.26 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.12 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy0.06 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.01 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy0.01 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy-0.13 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.04 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.29 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.54 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.10 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.42 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.25 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.10 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.08 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.20 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.25 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.33 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.19 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.27 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT-0.36 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.69 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.81 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.05 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.87 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.62 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.71 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.69 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.54 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.36 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy-0.21 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.78 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.43 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.90 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy0.60 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.18 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.16 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.15 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.24 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.20 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.22 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.11 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.16 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.05 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.16 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.18 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.09 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.19 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT-0.16 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.07 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task-0.08 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task-0.01 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task-0.06 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task-0.04 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.01 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task-0.03 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.00 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task0.15 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task-0.02 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task-0.09 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.04 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.23 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.02 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.16 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.08 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.03 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.02 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.02 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.18 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task0.04 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task-0.03 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task-0.06 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.22 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.06 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.16 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.15 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.42 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.06 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.05 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.21 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.03 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.25 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task-0.41 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.12 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.19 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task0.20 cohens d
Primary

Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task

The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.

Time frame: Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Passive Control - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.08 cohens d
Passive Control - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task-0.06 cohens d
Passive Control - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task-0.08 cohens d
Passive Control - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task-0.09 cohens d
Passive Control - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.26 cohens d
Passive Control - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.25 cohens d
Passive Control - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task-0.10 cohens d
Acute Exercise - PlaceboEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task-0.03 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 20 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.34 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 40 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.00 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 60 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.04 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 80 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.05 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 100 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.10 cohens d
Acute Exercise - 120 IUEffect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task0.05 cohens d
Primary

Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol

The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. Burning/tingling of the nose and watering/tearing of the eyes during the nasal spray were the most cited symptoms.

Time frame: During the 20 minute exercise/control period and the cognitive assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Passive Control - PlaceboNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol4 Participants
Passive Control - 20 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol6 Participants
Passive Control - 40 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol6 Participants
Passive Control - 60 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol4 Participants
Passive Control - 80 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol5 Participants
Passive Control - 100 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol9 Participants
Passive Control - 120 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol5 Participants
Acute Exercise - PlaceboNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol2 Participants
Acute Exercise - 20 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol4 Participants
Acute Exercise - 40 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol3 Participants
Acute Exercise - 60 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol4 Participants
Acute Exercise - 80 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol4 Participants
Acute Exercise - 100 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol7 Participants
Acute Exercise - 120 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol

The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. The most cited symptom was having a runny nose.

Time frame: Approximately 1 hour following the dose of intranasal insulin (~32 minutes following the end of the passive control/exercise condition; immediately following the completion of the post-test cognitive assessments)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Passive Control - PlaceboNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol1 Participants
Passive Control - 20 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol2 Participants
Passive Control - 40 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol0 Participants
Passive Control - 60 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol2 Participants
Passive Control - 80 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol1 Participants
Passive Control - 100 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol4 Participants
Passive Control - 120 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol3 Participants
Acute Exercise - PlaceboNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol0 Participants
Acute Exercise - 20 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol1 Participants
Acute Exercise - 40 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol2 Participants
Acute Exercise - 60 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol1 Participants
Acute Exercise - 80 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol0 Participants
Acute Exercise - 100 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol3 Participants
Acute Exercise - 120 IUNumber of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026