Skip to content

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Correlation to Quality of Life

Long-term Monitoring After Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Correlation to Quality of Life

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04290559
Acronym
LEARN-AF
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-03-02
Start date
2018-09-10
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2020-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Catheter ablation, Quality of life, Atrial fibrillation burden, Persistent atrial fibrillation

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine the atrial fibrillation burden reduction, or absolute atrial fibrillation burden, associated with improvement in quality of life in patients undergoing ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a higher risk of stroke, heart failure and deterioration in patients' quality of life and it also has great effect on health care resource utilization due to increasing morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation has shown to improve patients' quality of life (QOL), even in those who undergo a repeat procedure, equalizing healthy population and lowering subsequent health care resource utilization. Success rates are usually based on an endpoint of total elimination of AF, typically absence of any AF recurrence \>30 seconds. While this is a high standard for clinical trial reporting, it does not necessarily measure the clinical success, since many patients will experience significant reduction in their AF burden with accompanying improvement in their functional status despite having ongoing brief recurrences of AF. This is a prospective non-randomized, single-arm, cohort study. 200 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation will be enroled. AF burden post procedure will be evaluated with continuous monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) to assess recurrences and AF burden. QOL will be measured using the CCS-SAF severity scale, SF-36 and AFEQT scales pre-ablation and at 12 and 24 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREReveal LINQ ILR implant before AF ablation

Patients will undergo insertion of a LINQ ILR before the atrial fibrillation ablation performed according to standard clinical practice.

Sponsors

Newmarket Electrophysiology Research Group Inc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * Patients undergoing first-time or redo AF ablation. * Persistent or long-standing persistent AF * Symptomatic atrial fibrillation * Willing and able to provide informed consent. * Willing and able to set up and utilize MyCareLink® home monitor and be remotely monitored * Atrial fibrillation burden equal or more than 80% prior to the ablation

Exclusion criteria

* Paroxysmal AF * If the patient has had a cardioversion within 2 months of the ablation * Patients with contraindication to oral or intravenous anticoagulation. * Contraindication to implantation of an ILR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AF burden correlated with change in QOL.12 months, 24 monthsAF burden change and absolute AF burden correlated with change in QOL mesured at 12 and 24 months after the AF ablation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom of atrial arrhythmia12 months, 24 monthsFreedom of atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation (\> 30 sec) at 12 and 24 months after the ablation
Economic evaluation12 months, 24 monthsChange in AF burden correlated with change of health care resource utilization
Incidence of silent AF recurrences12 months, 24 monthsTotal asymptomatic AF burden (Percent time in AF)
Impact of antiarrhythmic treatment12 monthsCompare quality of life on and off antiarrhythmic medications using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale: range 0-100, 100 is best.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSherri Patterson, BScN
SPatterson@southlakeregional.org905-895-4521

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026