Skip to content

Enhancing Sexual Safety: Couples' Communication and HIV Testing Among YMSM

Enhancing Sexual Safety: Couples' Communication and HIV Testing Among YMSM

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04289116
Acronym
WeTestATN156
Enrollment
71
Registered
2020-02-28
Start date
2020-01-20
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2025-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV/AIDS, HIV Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare different ways to deliver the couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) intervention that is suited for adolescents and young adults.

Detailed description

Investigators will conduct a comparative effectiveness trial (CET) of CHTC for adolescent-age (15-24 years) same-sex male couples. This design tests the added benefits of adjunct intervention components delivered prior to receipt of CHTC-Assertive Communication Training (ACT) videos viewed by the individual or couple together and individually delivered Motivational Interviewing-based Communication Skills Training (MI-CST). These target the development of communication skills necessary to participate fully in HIV prevention and sexual safety discussions inherent to CHTC. Youth will be randomized to receive one of two conditions: Condition 1: watch videos on ACT, participate in Communication Skills Training (MI-CST), and complete an individual HIV test, or if participating as a couple will receive CHTC, and Condition 2: Individual HIV Testing (IHTC) as usual. Youth have the choice of attending the baseline visit alone or with their partner and have the option to bring their partner in later after completing the baseline alone. Youth in this CET will complete follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWe Test

This design tests the added benefits of adjunct intervention components delivered prior to receipt of CHTC-Assertive Communication Training (ACT) videos viewed by the couple separately and individually delivered Motivational Interviewing-based Communication Skills Training (MI-CST). These target the development of communication skills necessary to participate fully in HIV prevention and sexual safety discussions inherent to CHTC.

BEHAVIORALIHTC

Individual HIV Testing and Counseling

Sponsors

Hunter College of City University of New York
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wayne State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Florida State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

At baseline participants will be randomized to one of two conditions: Condition 1: MI-CST + observation of ACT videos + CHTC, and Condition 2: Individual HIV Testing (IHTC) as usual. Youth have the choice of attending the baseline visit alone or with their partner and have the option to bring their partner in later after completing the baseline alone. Youth in this CET will complete follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least one partner must be HIV-negative or status unknown * THE INDEX PARTNER must be 15-24 years old * YMSM under age 18 MUST HAVE AN AGE CONCORDANT PARTNER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS STUDY, I.E., MINORS may only participate in the study with a partner within 2 years of age OF THE MINOR SUBJECT'S AGE. THE AGE CONCORDANT PARTNER MUST BE AT LEAST FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. * INDEX PARTNER MUST BE SEXUALLY ACTIVE (ANY ACTIVITY THAT COULD LEAD TO ORGASM) * CURRENTLY SEEING SOMEONE, DATING, EXPERIMENTING WITH RELATIONSHIPS OR IN A RELATIONSHIP * HAVE HAD SEX, HOOKED UP WITH OR MADE OUT WITH THAT PERSON * Both partners must be able to communicate in English. * LIVE IN OR NEAR NEW YORK CITY OR DETROIT OR SAN DIEGO * GENDER IDENTITY AS MALE OR nonbinary, GENDERQUEER, agender OR GENDER NONCOMFORMING

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable, serious psychiatric symptoms * Current suicidal/homicidal ideation * Current or prior Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) on the part of either relationship partner * IF EITHER PARTICIPATING PARTNER FELT PRESSURED OR COERCED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY OR FELT ANYONE MADE THEM FEEL THEY HAD TO PARTICIPATE IN THEY STUDY WHEN THEY DID NOT WANT TO.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HIV Transmission Risk Behaviorbaseline, month 3, month 6Self-reported Condomless anal sex with a casual partner

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Communication Skillsbaseline, month 3, month 6Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, higher scores are associated with better communication skills, range 0 - 150.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
We Test - Index Participants
Each individual who attended We Test received MI-CST + observation of ACT videos + CHTC. Youth have the choice of attending the baseline visit alone or with their partner and have the option to bring their partner in later after completing the baseline alone. We Test: This design tests the added benefits of adjunct intervention components delivered prior to receipt of CHTC-Assertive Communication Training (ACT) videos viewed by the couple separately and individually delivered Motivational Interviewing-based Communication Skills Training (MI-CST). These target the development of communication skills necessary to participate fully in HIV prevention and sexual safety discussions inherent to CHTC.
33
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index Participants
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling (IHTC). Youth have the choice of attending the baseline visit alone or with their partner and have the option to bring their partner in later after completing the baseline alone. IHTC: Individual HIV Testing and Counseling
37
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner Participants
Youth have the choice of attending the baseline visit alone or with their partner and have the option to bring their partner in later after completing the baseline alone. Only 1 couple chose this option. This couple attended the intervention together and received individual HIV testing and counseling.
1
Total71

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWe Test - Index ParticipantsIndividual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsIndividual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsTotal
Age, Continuous21.91 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86
22.38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77
24.00 Years22.18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
Current PrEP Use
No
21 Participants25 Participants1 Participants47 Participants
Current PrEP Use
Yes
12 Participants12 Participants0 Participants24 Participants
Employment
No
11 Participants11 Participants0 Participants22 Participants
Employment
Yes
22 Participants26 Participants1 Participants49 Participants
Gender Identity
Cisgender Male
26 Participants30 Participants1 Participants57 Participants
Gender Identity
Transgender, gender nonconforming, or assigned male at birth
7 Participants7 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Health Insurance
No
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Health Insurance
Yes, my guardian
14 Participants16 Participants1 Participants31 Participants
Health Insurance
Yes, my own
14 Participants16 Participants0 Participants30 Participants
Main Partner Age25.45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.89
26.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59
24.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
25.77 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.14
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
4 Participants11 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Latino
13 Participants9 Participants0 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants5 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
13 Participants12 Participants1 Participants26 Participants
Relationship Length (in months)19.21 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.03
21.14 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.56
2.00 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
19.97 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.59
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants37 Participants1 Participants71 Participants
Sexual Identity
Gay
23 Participants25 Participants1 Participants49 Participants
Sexual Identity
Other/Queer
10 Participants12 Participants0 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 370 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 370 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 370 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

HIV Transmission Risk Behavior

Self-reported Condomless anal sex with a casual partner

Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 6

Population: Intent to treat population. Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
We Test - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior3 month4 Participants
We Test - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk BehaviorBaseline9 Participants
We Test - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior6 month4 Participants
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior3 month8 Participants
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk BehaviorBaseline11 Participants
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior6 month6 Participants
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk BehaviorBaseline0 Participants
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior6 month0 Participants
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsHIV Transmission Risk Behavior3 month0 Participants
Comparison: Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.p-value: 0.2Negative Binomial Regression
Comparison: Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.p-value: 0.58Negative Binomial Regression
Secondary

Communication Skills

Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, higher scores are associated with better communication skills, range 0 - 150.

Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 6

Population: Intent to treat population. Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
We Test - Index ParticipantsCommunication Skills3 month125.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.04
We Test - Index ParticipantsCommunication SkillsBaseline123 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.01
We Test - Index ParticipantsCommunication Skills6 month125.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.81
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsCommunication Skills3 month119.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.97
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsCommunication SkillsBaseline121.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.78
Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index ParticipantsCommunication Skills6 month117.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsCommunication Skills6 month129.00 Units on a scale
Individual Counseling and Testing - Partner ParticipantsCommunication SkillsBaseline129.00 Units on a scale
Comparison: Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.p-value: 0.08t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Analysis only includes participants who participated in the We Test - Index arm and Individual HIV Testing and Counseling - Index arm on their own.p-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026