Hallux Valgus and Bunion
Conditions
Brief summary
This study analyses the Reverdin Isham procedure, which is the most popular minimally invasive surgical hallux valgus correction method and the minimally invasive chevron osteotomy, representing the standard technique of open surgery. It is hypothesized that the two techniques would show significant differences in regard to radiological outcome (Hypothesis 1), clinical outcome (Hypothesis 2) and development of radiological recurrence (Hypothesis 3).
Detailed description
Multiple different surgical techniques have been established for hallux valgus surgery so far, each technique with its unique advantages and limitations. The distal chevron method is widely accepted as a surgical method for correcting mild to moderate hallux valgus deformities. Numerous publications presenting the radiological outcome of this surgical technique and the clinical outcome by means of well established score systems have been published and make this technique, today's benchmark in hallux surgery. Due to scarring and decreased range of motion of the greater toe joint after open surgery and increasing patients' demands several minimally invasive techniques have been brought to public in the last few years. These techniques claim minor soft tissue damage and reduced surgical time. The efficiency and stability of correction, as well as the clinical outcome of these techniques have been discussed controversially. However, most studies present data from minimally invasive surgery without specific differentiation of the type of surgery and in regard to the clinical and radiological outcome. Recently a prospective randomized study comparing the open versus the minimally invasive chevron technique has been published presenting data with comparable clinical and radiological outcome. Given the above-mentioned lack of evidence it was the aim of the study to compare the results of two different minimally invasive techniques. The investigators analyzed the Reverdin Isham procedure, which is known as the technique, that made minimally invasive hallux surgery popular and the minimally invasive chevron osteotomy. It was hypothesized that the two techniques would show significant differences in regard to radiological outcome (Hypothesis 1), clinical outcome (Hypothesis 2) and development of radiological recurrence (Hypothesis 3).
Interventions
PROCEDUREdistal minimally invasive chevron osteotomy
With an electric motor-driven machine the resection of the medial eminence as well as a V-shaped osteotomy was performed in hallux valgus patients. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to identify the ideal osteotomy site and to control the Intervention. Fixation of the metatarsal head was achieved with a screw or with a K wire. Residual bone ridges were reamed and bone debris washed out.
Sponsors
Medical University Innsbruck
Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* patients after minimally invasive distal Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus deformity with a Minimum follow up of 24 months * patients with informed written consent for being analyzed * patients, of whom radiographs are available from preoperative throughout the follow-up time of 24 months
Exclusion criteria
* patients under 18 years of age * pregnant patients, or women below the age of 50 ys, of whom the pregnancy status is not clear * patients with mental illness or patients, who cannot follow the required postoperative Treatment or controls * patients, who refuse to participate * patients, who are assigned to other clinical studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| radiological outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature | change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature) | radiographic (Hallux valgus angle, Intermetatarsal articular angle and distal metatarsal articular angle measured in grades) with the minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy is evaluated. Data is collected from a consecutive Patient cohort treated at the investigator´s Department. A cohort of more than 50 patients will be assessed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| clinical outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature | change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature) | clinical outcome (visual analogue scale- 10 Points maximum, 0 Points Minimum; higher score means worse outcome) with the minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy is evaluated.Data is collected from a consecutive Patient cohort treated at the investigator´s Department. A cohort of more than 50 patients will be assessed. |
Countries
Austria
Outcome results
None listed