Skip to content

The Learning Effects of Task-priority Strategy on Dual-task Weight Shifting and Brain Plasticity in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

The Learning Effects of Task-priority Strategy on Dual-task Weight Shifting and Brain Plasticity in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04288024
Enrollment
28
Registered
2020-02-27
Start date
2020-02-25
Completion date
2020-06-22
Last updated
2021-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postural and Suprapostural Performance During Dual Tasking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Parkinson, dual-task training, attention, electroencephalogram (EEG)

Brief summary

(1) postural and suprapostural performance of a dual task would be differently affected by the strategy of task prioritization and (2) the cortical activation is different according to attentional focus strategies.

Detailed description

These hypothesis would be tested by gait performance, suprapostural accuracy and relative power spectrum of EEG.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWeight-shifting training

Postural task: Participants are standing with their weak side on the force plate. During the task, they wight-shift from side to side ranging from 10 to 90 percent of their body weight. Suprapostural task: Participants hold a tray with their arms beside the body, 90 degrees of elbow flexion. They rotate the tray left and right for 45 degrees respectively. During their task, participants should weight-shift and rotate the tray at the same time.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. modified H-Y stage II-III Parkinson's disease 2. No other diseases 3. Non-demented PD 4. Non-tremor PD

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angles from inclinometer60 minutesperformance of the suprapostural task
EEG relative power in the delta band60 minutespostural and suprapostural performance of a dual task
EEG relative power in the theta band60 minutespostural and suprapostural performance of a dual task
EEG relative power in the alpha band60 minutespostural and suprapostural performance of a dual task
COP trajectory recorded from the force plate60 minutesperformance of the postural task
EEG relative power in the beta band60 minutespostural and suprapostural performance of a dual task
EEG relative power in the gamma band60 minutespostural and suprapostural performance of a dual task

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cadence from GAITRite5 minutesgait performance
Mean step length from GAITRite5 minutesgait performance
Step-to-step variability from GAITRite5 minutesgait performance
Gait velocity from GAITRite5 minutesgait performance

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026