Skip to content

Comparison of Outcomes in Asleep and Awake DBS With a Directional Electrode

Comparison of Outcomes in Asleep and Awake DBS With a Directional Electrode

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04287465
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-02-27
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Brain Stimulation, Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

To compare the clinical outcome of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with directional deep brain (dDBS) stimulation undergoing subthalamic deep brain stimulation operation (STN-DBS) under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia.

Detailed description

To compare the clinical outcome of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with directional deep brain (dDBS) stimulation undergoing subthalamic deep brain stimulation operation (STN-DBS) under general anesthesia versus local anesthesia. In awake group, 10 patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with St Jude Medical/Abbott Infinity DBS system, and the electrode implantation and testing were performed while the patients were awake. In asleep group, 14 patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with St Jude Medical/Abbott Infinity DBS system, and the electrode implantation were performed while the patients were under general anesthesia. The clinical outcome of the DBS treatment, possible adverse effects and the electrode placement will be compared within these two groups.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Turku
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Advanced Parkinson's disease * The clinical decision of DBS treatment * The clinical inclusion criteria of DBS treatment: * drug-resistant tremor * severe daily motor fluctuations or dyskinesia in despite of the optimal oral medication * an improvement of UPDRS III scores over 30 % in levodopa challenge test.

Exclusion criteria

* The general

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of UPDRS III score6 monthsThe UPDRS III score (0-60 points) at 6-months' follow-up compared to preoperative UPDRS III score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of levodopa equivalent dose, LED6 monthsThe change of levodopa equivalent dose (LED 0 - 2000 mg) at 6-months' follow-up compared to preoperative LED
Electrode trajectory6 monthsThe comparison of the actual trajectory of the DBS electrode and the anticipated trajectory of the DBS electrode in both patient groups

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026