Skip to content

The Effects of Online Single-Session Interventions on College Student Well-being

The Effects of Online Single-Session Interventions on College Student Well-being

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04287374
Enrollment
294
Registered
2020-02-27
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Affect, Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Well-Being

Brief summary

This study seeks to investigate the effects of an online single-session intervention on college student mental health and well-being. Undergraduate students from the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard will be randomized to a 30-minute single-session intervention or a study skills control group. Students' depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, positive and negative affect, and subjective well-being will be assessed up to 12 weeks post-intervention.

Detailed description

The design of our study is a randomized control trial. After enrollment in the study, participants will randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In each condition, participants will be asked to complete an initial survey of mental health and well-being measures. Following this survey, participants will complete either a well-being skills single-session intervention or control single-session intervention (study skills) depending on which condition they were assigned to. These single-session interventions educate the participant on their focal concept and teach them exercises to improve that skill. Completing the single-session intervention will take approximately 20-30 minutes. After completing their single-session intervention, all participants will retake the measures of mental health and well-being presented to them at the beginning of the program. Participants will also be asked to complete measures of intervention feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness at this time. Following this initial intervention, participants will retake the measures of well-being and mental health at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after they completed the intervention. This will allow us to fulfill our first objective by determining how long single-session interventions improve undergraduate mental health and well-being.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMulti-component Well-being Intervention

The intervention asks participants to complete exercises based on three different skills. These skills include cognitive restructuring, gratitude and behavioral activation. After completing the program, participants will pick their favorite exercise to complete on a weekly basis for homework. In order to increase compliance with the homework, participants will complete a short plan in which they will identify when, where and with who they will complete the homework. The whole intervention takes approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

BEHAVIORALStudy Skills

Participants are taught three different study skills/strategies. They are asked to make a plan to continue using these strategies after completing the intervention. The whole intervention takes approximately 20-30 minutes to complete.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Current undergraduate student at select universities * Able to access the internet * Can participate in follow-up surveys for three months post sign-up

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to access the internet * Will not be able to respond to the follow-up surveys post-intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)Change from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upDepression Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7)Change from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upAnxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Change in The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing ScaleChange from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upWell-being questionnaire. Total score ranges from 14 to 70. Higher values indicate a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gratitude Questionnaire-6Change from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upGratitude questionnaire. Total score ranges from 6 to 42. Higher scores indicate more gratitude.
Change in Beck Hopelessness Scale (4-item version)Change from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upHope Questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate less hope (or more hopelessness).
Acceptability of Intervention MeasureImmediately post-intervention (0 weeks)Questionnaire measuring the acceptability of an intervention. Acceptability refers to the perception that a given treatment is agreeable or satisfactory. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Change in Positive and Negative Affect ScheduleChange from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upAffect Questionnaire. Scores range from 10-50 for positive affect and negative affect subscales. Higher scores represent higher levels of affect.
Change in Perceived Stress Scale-4Change from baseline at 2 week follow-up, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-upPerceived stress questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 16. Higher scores indicate more stress.
Feasibility of Intervention MeasureImmediately post-intervention (0 weeks)Questionnaire measuring the feasibility of an intervention. Feasibility refers to the degree to which a treatment can be successfully implemented in a given setting. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Intervention Appropriateness MeasureImmediately post-intervention (0 weeks)Questionnaire measuring the appropriateness of an intervention. Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit or relevance of an intervention. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026