Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy of PRP and Dry Needling in Management of Trigger Points in Masseter Muscle in MPS Patients

Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection and Dry Needling in Management of Trigger Points in Masseter Muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04286880
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-02-27
Start date
2020-02-24
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Brief summary

Title: Comparative Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma injection and Dry Needling in management of trigger points in masseter muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome patients. Rationale: Pain and trismus caused by Myofascial pain syndrome in masticatory muscles are one of the prime concerns for the patients. In the recent times, Platelet Rich Plasma therapy has been studied extensively and has produced promising results. It is used to promote sarcomere repair by concentrating growth factors and decrease inflammation by inhibiting pro-inflammatory and apoptotic cells. Thus, the present study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma injection in trigger points in masseter muscle in myofascial pain syndrome patients. Research Question P: Population (Patients with trigger points in masseter muscle) I: Intervention (PRP injection) C: Control (Dry needling) O: Outcome (Improvement in symptom of pain ) T: Time Frame (1 year) S: Study Design (Randomized clinical trial) Setting in Haryana , India Is Platelet Rich Plasma more effective as compared to dry needling alone in treatment of trigger points in masseter muscle in Myofascial Pain Syndrome patients ?

Detailed description

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a commonly encountered condition frequently associated with the muscles of mastication. It is defined as a regional muscular pain condition characterized by myofascial trigger points found in one or more muscles and/ or connective tissues. A trigger point is an exquisitely tender spot in discrete taut band of hardened muscle that produce local and referred pain, among other symptoms. Associated symptoms may include muscle weakness, muscle spasm, stiffness, decreased range of motion and autonomic dysfunction. Trigger point can be active i.e. always tender or latent i.e. tender only when palpated. Any kind of muscle overuse or direct trauma to the muscle can lead to the development of trigger points. Although muscle damage is not required for the development of trigger point, it may be caused by the disruption of the cell membrane, damage to the sarcoplasmic reticulum with a subsequent release of high amounts of calcium ions, and disruption of cytoskeletal proteins, such as desmin, titin and dystrophin. Muscle overuse leads to ATP depletion which causes oxidative stress resulting in local ischemia and lowered pH with subsequent accumulation of inflammatory mediators at these trigger points. Various therapeutic modalities have been used to treat myofascial trigger points and myofascial pain syndrome including therapeutic ultrasound, muscle stretching, manipulation, acupuncture, occlusal appliances, botulinum injection, pharmacotherapy and dry needling. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is a newer therapeutic modality for treatment of trigger points. PRP contains many growth factors important for muscle regeneration and myogenesis. The goal of PRP therapy is to concentrate the main growth factors from native blood and to reintroduce them in the injured tissue. Besides healing, it can also decrease pro-inflammatory and apoptotic cells, reducing inflammation. However, still there is paucity of literature and lack of RCT related to use of PRP in trigger points. So, the present study has been designed to evaluate the efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma injection in trigger points in masseter muscle in myofascial pain syndrome patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPRP injection

Clinically proven cases of Trigger points in masseter muscle will be randomly and equally divided into test group and control group. The selected subjects will be divided into two groups. Test group will be administered 0.5 ml of PRP solution per trigger point in masseter muscle according to symptoms of patient at baseline (0 week). PRP will be prepared as per methodology mentioned by Okuda et al 2003.

PROCEDUREDry needling

In control group all the armamentarium and procedure will remain same except that no PRP solution will be delivered. Only dry needling will be performed on the baseline.

Sponsors

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The following patients will be included in the study: 1. Patients diagnosed with myofascial pain within masseter muscle as per RDC/TMD (Ia and Ib) 2. Patient's consent for participation in this study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with phobia to needles 2. Patients who have undergone previous treatment for myofascial pain in past 3 months 3. Patients with active infection at the site of injection 4. Patients with history of head and neck fracture in the past 6 months. 5. Patients with healing disorder or systemic disease where healing response is compromised 6. Patients on anticoagulant medication 7. Patients with bleeding and clotting disorder 8. Patients with epilepsy/seizures 9. Pregnancy/ Lactation 10. Patients addicted to alcohol/ drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of pain improvement upto 3 months3 monthsusing Visual Analog Scale score; (0-10); 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain
Maximal Mouth Opening change from baseline to 3 months3 monthsmeasured by digital vernier callipers

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for pain medicine utilization3 monthsNo. of tablets consumed per week
Range of Right and left Lateral excursion movements3 monthsmeasured in mm
assessment of Sleep pattern3 months.Visual Analog Scale score (0-10); higher score indicates sleep disturbance
assessment of Patient satisfaction3 monthsby Likert scale
Range of Protrusive movement3 monthsmeasured in mm

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactSanjay Tewari
principalpgidsrohtak@gmail.com01262283876

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026