Stroke Sequelae
Conditions
Keywords
participation, Frenchay Activity Index, Walking Handicap Classification, Stroke Rehabilitation
Brief summary
This study is aimed at providing an Italian version of two assessment tools for participation in stroke patients, the Frenchay Activity Index (FAI) and the Walking Handicap Classification (WHC) by a standardized translation and transcultural validation protocol. The protocol includes a pre-test of the Italian version on ten patients, a final revision, and a validation on a sample of 60 stroke patients.
Detailed description
This study is aimed at providing an Italian version of two tools to assess participation in stroke patients, the Frenchay Activity Index (FAI) and the Walking Handicap Classification (WHC). These tools have been recently indicated for the assessment of participation in Stroke patients by the Italian Association of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (Minimal Stroke Assessment Protocol - PMIC2); they are currently used in Italian research and clinical settings, but no official translation exists. The process requires a standardized translation protocol, including forward and backward translation, using a multistep revision structure, to ensure conceptual and semantic equivalence. The validation process includes a pilot evaluation of on 10 individuals post-stroke admitted to the Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Foundation Don Gnocchi Scientific Institute, and a validation on a sample of 60 stroke patients including reliability, internal consistency and concurrent validity assessment of the translated version against the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) - Italian version and the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) - Italian version, respectively
Interventions
Pre-test: Two expert physicians/physical therapist shall be involved in the questionnaire administration (A/B). The questionnaires shall be randomly administered to the patients by one operator at T0 the same test shall be readministered after 1-2 weeks by another operator (T1), blind to the first assessment; the second operator shall also administer the additional measures (SIP and RMI);
OTHERQuestionnaire administration - validation
Validation Two expert physicians shall be involved in the questionnaire administration (A/B). The questionnaires shall be randomly administered to the patients by one operator at T0 the same test shall be readministered after 1-2 weeks by another operator (T1), blind to the first assessment; the second operator shall also administer the additional measures (SIP and RMI); In case the patient is unable to be interviewed due to aphasia cognitive or sensorial problems, a proxy would be interviewed both at T0 and at T1 (the same proxy would be interviewed both times)
Sponsors
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Pre-test: consecutive recruitment of 10 post-stroke patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation treatment at the Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Foundation don Gnocchi Scientific Institute. Inclusion criteria: * age 18-90; * stroke occurred within 3 months from enrollment; * clinical stability (SIC = 0).
Exclusion criteria
* stroke recurrence; * visual and / or hearing disorders; * cognitive decline (MMSE \<21) and/or severe aphasia, which would limit the the patients' understanding of and the reliable answering to the two assessment tools Validation: recruitment of 60 post-stroke patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation treatment at the Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Foundation don Gnocchi Scientific Institute- Inclusion criteria: * age 18-90, * stroke occurred within 8 months from enrollment; * clinical stability (SIC = 0). Criteria for carrying out the interview with a proxy. If a proxy is not available, the patient is excluded: * visual and / or hearing disorders; * cognitive decline (MMSE \<21) and/or severe aphasia, which would limit the patients' understanding of and the reliable answering to the two assessment tools.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Interrater reliability | 1 year | Intraclass Correlation Coefficient \>=0,70 |
| Internal consistency (FAI) | 1 year | Cronbach's alpha\>=0,70 |
| concurrent validity of FAI against SIP | 1 year | Spearman's coefficient \>=0.25-0.50 |
| concurrent validity of WHC against RMI | 1 year | Spearman's coefficient \>=0.25-0.50 |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed