Skip to content

Keep bIfurcation Single Stenting Simple

A Randomized, Prospective, Post-market, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Potential Benefit of Side Branch Ballooning, in the Setting of Single Stenting With Systematic Proximal Optimization Technique, in the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04285372
Acronym
KISS
Enrollment
596
Registered
2020-02-26
Start date
2020-08-03
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2024-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Keywords

Coronary disease, Bifurcation lesion

Brief summary

KISS study is an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, prospective, randomized (1:1), parallel, two-arm, non-inferiority trial aiming to compare two bifurcation PCI procedures for Side Branch protection

Detailed description

In the treatment of bifurcation lesion, the role of side branch intervention for improving the safety of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), when MB is treated according to the Murray law with a Proximal Optimization Technique (POT), remains unclear. The KISS study will evaluate the non-inferiority of no side branch intervention versus side branch ballooning, in the setting of single stenting with systematic proximal optimization technique.

Interventions

PROCEDURESide branch protection/ballooning

Side branch protection in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of bifurcation lesion

PROCEDURENo side branch protection/ballooning

No intervention on the side branch

Sponsors

Ceric Sàrl
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Coronary artery disease requiring revascularization that is amenable to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 2. Any de novo Medina type bifurcation lesion with \>70% lesion in the main vessel by visual assessment except Medina 0,0,1 if the planned strategy does not include a main branch stenting 3. Side branch diameter compatible with a PCI with stent implantation (≥ 2.25mm) 4. Side branch requiring a protection wire according to operator evaluation 5. Anatomy compatible with a proximal optimization technique 6. Post main branch treatment (stenting then POT): Absence of side branch occlusion Or low flow associated with ongoing ischemia (either chest pain or ST changes) 7. Male or female patient \>18 years old

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute myocardial infarction with ongoing ST-elevation 2. Cardiogenic shock 3. Requirement for ongoing hemodialysis 4. Life-expectancy limited to \<12 months due to co-morbid condition 5. Lesion involves the left main coronary artery 6. Lesion requiring a double stenting 7. Plan to treat \>1 other coronary vessel at the time of the index procedure 8. Two lesions treated in the same session: unsuccessful PCI on the single non bifurcation lesion in a non-target vessel before the treatment of the target lesion. 9. Chronic total occlusion of any target vessel 10. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<20% 11. Side branch TIMI Flow \<3 12. Pre-dilatation of the Side Branch during the procedure prior to randomization 13. Known allergy to Aspirin 14. Known allergy to Clopidorel and Prasugrel and Ticagrelor 15. Known allergy to stent drug elutant 16. Known allergy to any other component of Onyx Resolute stent 17. Ongoing participation in another investigational device or drug study 18. Inability to provide informed consent 19. Patients under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship 20. Pregnant and breast-feeding women or intention to become pregnant prior to completion of all follow-up procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periprocedural Myocardial infarctionup to 48 hours post-procedure, up to 12 monthsRate of peri-procedural Myocardial Infarction (MI) at discharge or 48 hours post-procedure whichever comes first as judged by clinical evaluation in association with day-1 troponin evaluation using the ARC-2 definition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical success (2)Intraoperative, up to 12 monthsTotal procedure time
Technical success (3)up to 12 monthsAcute gain in main and side branches as measured with a dedicated quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) software
Technical success (4)Intraoperative, up to 12 monthsFluoroscopy time
Technical success (5)Intraoperative, up to 12 monthsTotal radiation dose (air kerma)
Technical success (1)Intraoperative, up to 12 monthsDeployment of main branch (MB) stent with \<20% residual stenosis and a patent side branch at end of procedure upon corelab analysis
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)1 month and 12 monthsComposite of: * Cardiac Death * Target vessel Myocardial Infarction * Clinically driven Target lesion revascularization (ci-TLR)
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)1 month and 12 monthsMain Branch & Side Branch TLR
Stent thrombosis:1 month and 12 monthsDefinite or Probable stent thrombosis (ARC-2 criteria)
Angina status1 month and 12 monthsAngina status according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification (Grade 1 to 4)
Technical success (6)Intraoperative, up to 12 monthsTotal contrast dose

Countries

France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026