Skip to content

Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fracture

Analgesic Techniques Before Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Repair: Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04285333
Enrollment
88
Registered
2020-02-26
Start date
2020-03-17
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fracture, Analgesia, Acute Pain

Keywords

hip fracture, nerve block, spinal anesthesia, analgesia

Brief summary

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a widely accepted anesthetic technique for hip fracture repair among elderly. Positioning for SA can be extremely painful. Effective management of pain is important for these patients comfort. Fascia Iliaca block (FIB) and Femoral nerve blocks are commonly used for analgesia in hip fracture patients. However, they often provide a modest reduction in pain. The Percapsular Nerve Group block (PENG Block) has the advantage that it covers the accessory obturator nerve. Aim of the study: compare FIB with PENG prior to positioning hip fracture patients for standardized SA. In a prospective randomized double blind we included 80 patients aged more than 65 years old, for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees. Patients were assigned to receive either ultrasound guided Fascia Iliaca block or Percapsular Nerve Group block using 20 mL Lidocaine 1.5% in both groups. We compared pain on positioning for spinal anesthesia using Verbal Rating Scale (VRS 0 = no pain , VRS 1 = mild pain, t 2= severe pain) for both groups. We also recorded different times to perfom block.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study was to compare analgesis effect of Percapsula nerve group block to fascia iliaca block prior to positioning hip fracture patients for standardized SA. We included 80 patients reporting pain with Verbal Rating Scale at 2 when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees. All patients admitted to induction room, were given standard monitoring and we randomized to receive either: ultrasound fascia iliaca block using linear high frequency ultrasound probe (10-15MHz) placed in a transverse direction over the anterior thigh below the inguinal ligament. A 50 mm needle was advanced until the tips placed underneath the fascia iliaca and 20 mL 1.5% Lidocaine was injected or ultrasound Percapsula nerve group block A curvilinear using low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) that was initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counter clockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the iliopubic eminence , the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed and than a 100 mm needle was advanced to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly and 20 mL 1.5% Lidocaine.We compared pain on positioning for spinal anesthesia and also different time to realise both blocks.

Interventions

ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%

PROCEDUREpercapsular nerve group block

ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%

Sponsors

University Tunis El Manar
Lead SponsorOTHER
Institut Kassab d'Orthopédie
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

all blocks were performed in a special area outside operating room by docters only implicated in performance assessement of block and not in patient care. Patients where after moved to operating room, care provider wil assess pain before spinal anesthesia

Intervention model description

Prospective randomised single blinded study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- Patients aged ≥ 65 years old and undergoing hip fracture surgical repair under continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA). * Patients for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees (VERBAL PAIN SCALE =2)

Exclusion criteria

* \- ASA physical status ≥ 4. * Impaired cognition or Dementia. * Multiple fractures. * Contraindication to regional anesthesia. * Patient's disapproval.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
positioning painup to 30 minutesVerbal Rating Scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Imaging timeup to 10 minutesFor the PENG block:the femoral artery, the anterior inferior iliac spine, the iliopubic eminence and the psoas tendon. For the FIB: the femoral artery, the iliacus muscle, the fascia iliaca and the fascia lata.
Puncture timeup to 10 minutesthe time that stretches from the introduction of the needle until the end of the injection of local anesthetic
Performance timeup to 10 minutesthe imaging time + time to puncture.
Number of puncturesup to 10 minutesthe number of redirection of the needle after removing 2 cm.
Positioning Ratingup to 40 minutesverbal rating scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]
pain 10 after blockup to 10 minutesverbal rating scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]
pain 15 after blockup to 15 minutesverbal rating scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]
pain 20 after blockup to 20 minutesverbal rating scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]
pain 5 after blockup to 5 minutesverbal rating scale (VRS) \[0=no pain ; 4=worst pain\]

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026