Skip to content

Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques

A Novel Co-induction Technique Compared to Standard Inhalational and Intravenous Induction Techniques: a Prospective Randomized Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04284644
Enrollment
105
Registered
2020-02-26
Start date
2016-05-01
Completion date
2017-01-03
Last updated
2020-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Keywords

General anesthesia, Propofol, Sevoflurane, Co-induction, Laryngeal mask airway

Brief summary

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction.

Detailed description

Co-induction technique refers to the use of a combination of medications to reach the desired therapeutic target. This technique is considered an approach that can be of a great benefit to patients with chronic medical illnesses and those who have moderate to high risk for general anaesthesia. In the present study, the investigators examined the safety of a novel co-induction approach that relied on a simple timing and dosing alterations to the classical approaches of inhalational sevoflurane and propofol induction. The significance of this study is to find a reliable safe alternative method of induction that can provide optimal parameters,when compared to the classical methods of induction. The investigators evaluated the time needed for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, number of LMA insertion trials, succession of LMA insertion, adverse events related to the airway, respiratory and cardiovascular systems, haemodynamic stability and satisfaction scores of enrolled patients.

Interventions

DRUGInduction using propofol

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, a dose of 1.5 mg/kg of propofol slowly over 2 minutes.

DRUGInduction using sevoflurane

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 8% inhalational sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen.

DRUGInduction using propofol and sevoflurane

Patients were given 1.5 mcg/Kg of fentanyl intravenously. two minutes after the fentanyl dose, patient received 4% sevoflurane through sealed plastic face mask at 8 L/min flow of oxygen for 2 minutes, followed by a dose of 0.75 mg/kg of propofol given slowly.

Sponsors

University of Jordan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients with Age ≥ 65 years. * American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score II or III. * minimally invasive endoscopic urological procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* patient refusal. * Age \< 65 years. * family history of malignant hyperthermia. * prolonged surgery that needed intubation. * body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative respiratory adverse events8 monthsThe investigators recorded the occurrence of transient apnea intraoperatively, in addition to laryngeal spasm, coughing, gagging and increased salivation. The study chart included the documentation these common adverse events, the timing of occurrence, and the intervention required to manage these events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time for successful laryngeal mask airway insertion8 monthsThe investigators assessed the time needed for LMA insertion. The timer was started upon giving the fentanyl, recording the time till successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway.
Blood pressure stability8 monthsThe investigators recorded patients' blood pressure readings throughout the induction procedure.
Heart rate stability8 monthsThe investigators recorded patients' heart rate throughout the induction procedure.
Changes in oxygen saturation8 monthsThe investigators recorded patients' oxygen saturation throughout the induction procedure.

Countries

Jordan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026