Skip to content

A Study Protocol Comparing a Home Rehabilitation Program Versus e-Health Program in Low Back Pain

A Study Protocol Randomised Feasibility Trial Comparing a Home Rehabilitation Program Versus e-Health Program on Disability, Pain, Fear of Movement, Quality of Life and Spinal Mobility in Non-specific Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04283370
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-02-25
Start date
2020-09-05
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, electroanalgesia, exercise program, e-health, Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of providing an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the McKenzie Method for patients with chronic low back pain in primary care, compared with the same home rehabilitation program but without the support of an electronic program.

Detailed description

A double blind clinical trial will be developed in a sample of 80 subjects with chronic low back pain. Patients will receive 3 weekly sessions of electroanalgesia and an exercise program for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The aim is to analyze the effectiveness of a home rehabilitation program vs a web platform program on disability, pain, fear of movement, quality of life, resistance of the trunk flexors, lumbar mobility in flexion and muscular electrical activity.

Interventions

It consists in a home rehabilitation program performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.

It consists in an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.

Sponsors

Universidad de Almeria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain ≥ 3 months. * Age between 30 and 67 years old. * Score ≥ 4 points on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. * Not being receiving physical therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of lumbar stenosis. * Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis. * Diagnosis of fibromyalgia. * Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks. * History of spine surgery. * Contraindication of analgesic electrical therapy. * Have previously received a treatment of electrical analgesia or exercise. * Central or peripheral nervous system disease. * Agoraphobia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline the acceptability and demand of the e-Health intervention for patients and physiotherapists in comparison with the home rehabilitation program for the optimization of their design, development and deliveryAt baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 monthsThe extent to which participants who have received the intervention through a web application consider that the content and support materials (web application and initial learning sessions) are appropriate and satisfactory to obtain the expected results.The extent to which the physiotherapists who have administered the intervention consider that the training, content and support materials are appropriate.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 10-items Patients rate their acceptability and demand of treatment received and trial participation, including the burden of outcome measure completion. Measured with 10-point numeric rating scales ranging from not at all satisfactory to extremely satisfactory
Change from baseline the feasibility of the trial proceduresAt baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 monthsThe extent to which participants believe that their eligibility, outcome measures, follow-up and intervention by the physiotherapist have been satisfactory. The extent to which physiotherapists who have participated in the trial consider recruitment, outcome measures, evaluation follow-ups and appropriate and satisfactory intervention procedures.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 4-items Measured with 10-point numeric rating scales ranging from not at all helpful to extremely helpful
Change from baseline adaptation of the e-Health intervention and the trial procedures for to randomized clinical trial definitiveAt baseline, immediate post-treatment and 6 monthsThe extent to which the content of the e-health intervention, support materials and learning classes should be modified to improve their acceptability and implementation for a future definitive trial The extent to which recruitment, follow-up procedures and the number and outcome measures should be modified during / at the end of the trial to improve its acceptability and implementation for a definitive future trial.Brief questionnaire developed for this trial\* 11-items Measured using yes/no responses

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsIs a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury.Patient rate beliefs about their kinesiophobia on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Change from baseline on Quality of Life. SF-36 Health questionnaire.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsSF-36 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life.The higher the score, the higher the quality of life
Change from Mcquade Test.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsIt measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles in seconds.
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability QuestionnaireAt baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsThis is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities.Ranging from 0 points- better to 24 points- worse disability
Changes from baseline in Lumbar electromyography.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsThe degree of electromyographic activation of the lumbar paravertebral musculature will be carried out by using a set of electrodes of 3x7 dimensions that will be applied uniformly in the lumbar region from the spinal level from L2 to L5.
Change from baselina in range of motion and lumbar segmental mobilityAt baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsThis variable is quantified using the SpinalMouse ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagittal spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way.
Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsFor the quantification of lumbar flexion an angular inclinometer is used (Fleximeter UM 8320-3 RJ Code Research Institute, Brazil).
Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsIt has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each ítem has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points.The higher scores mean a worse outcome
Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 monthsA 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain.Range from no pain 0 to maximum pain 10 points

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026