Skip to content

Predictors of Response in Chronic Stroke

Neurophysiological and Kinematic Predictors of Response in Chronic Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04283253
Acronym
SRT5
Enrollment
1
Registered
2020-02-25
Start date
2019-10-22
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2022-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Stroke

Brief summary

This study will validate a predictive model that uses demographics, functional status, neurophysiology, neuroanatomy, and other potential biomarkers to predict the likelihood of a clinically significant change in impairment at the end of a robot assisted therapy intervention.The study will include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and an arm exercise program consisting of robot-assisted exercise combined with functional arm exercise called transition to task training (TTT).

Detailed description

After informed consent, a baseline neurological exam, medical records review, MRI of the brain, TMS, questionnaires, cognitive testing, robot evaluations, and arm function testing will occur. Baseline testing will occur in the first 4-6 weeks of participation including two separate sessions approximately 1 week a part to examine arm strength, range of motion, and ability to perform functional tasks, with one additional session if needed to verify stability between results. Additionally, one robot evaluation will be completed. The intervention phase consists of 12 weeks of robot and transition to task arm exercise training (TTT). Interventions will occur approximately 3 times per week for 12 weeks for a total of 36 visits. Additional time and visits will be allowed with visits occurring 4 times per week or up to 6 additional weeks (not to exceed 18 weeks) if scheduling conflicts arise. The intervention sessions will be one hour in duration. During the hour-long intervention, 45 minutes of robotic intervention will be followed by 15 minutes of TTT. The training will be sequential with 12 sessions focused on the wrist, followed by 12 sessions on the shoulder-elbow and the final 12 sessions alternating between the wrist and elbow-shoulder. After the final training session, subjects will return after a 12 week retention period. At various time points during and after the intervention phase there will be additional arm function testing, robot evaluations, questionnaires, MRI and TMS sessions for re-assessment.

Interventions

The intervention will be completed 36 visits approximately 3x/week for 12-18 weeks. The training progression will be sequential with 12 visits completed on the wrist robot, followed by 12 visits on the shoulder-elbow robot and completing with 12 visits alternating sessions on the wrist and shoulder-elbow robot. Participants will perform robot training for 45 minutes with each robot followed by 15 minutes of TTT practice to complete their 60 minute intervention session.

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One-arm, multiple baseline sequential, cohort study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically defined, unilateral, hemiparetic stroke with radiologic exclusion of other possible diagnosis * Stroke onset at least 6 months before enrollment * Present with Mild/Moderate to Severe arm dysfunction (based on Fugl-Meyer scores of 10 to 45) * Be medically stable to participate in the study * Be English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to give informed consent * Have a serious complicating medical illness that would preclude participation. * Contractures or orthopedic problems limiting range of joint motion in the potential study arm * Visual loss such that the subject would not be able to see the test patterns on the robot computer monitor * Botulinum toxin to study arm within four months of study enrollment or if received during the study period * Unable to comply with requirements of the study * Participants with a history of a seizure will not be precluded from the study, but will not be enrolled in the TMS portions * Participants with electromagnetic exclusions (metal implants in the cranium, implanted electronic devices etc.) will not be precluded from the study but will be excluded from the MRI and TMS portions * Have a serious complicating medical illness that would preclude participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment ScoreImmediately following the 12-week interventionThe Fugl-Meyer is one of the primary outcome measures assessing change in arm use from baseline testing to mid-training after visits 12 and 24, and post-training after visit 36 and the 12 week retention period. It is a stroke-specific measure of impairment of the upper extremity that has been shown to be valid and reliable with high inter-rater and test-retest reliability. It provides a direct-observational assessment of volitional movement and motor impairment related to reflexes, sensation, and abnormal synergies. Each item on the FM is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). The scale ranges from 0-66 with higher scores representing less motor impairment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
A Change in Motor Evoked Potential During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor CortexImmediately following the 12-week interventionTMS stimulation of the motor cortex will be performed using MagStim 200 Magnetic Stimulators (MagStim Ltd., Wales, UK) to assess change in the motor evoked potential (MEP) of the arm muscles.
A Change in Brain Connections Assessed Via MRI of the BrainImmediately following the 12-week interventionA detailed analysis of the MRI data will examine individual interregional connections to determine whether any of them are more sensitive to the intervention than others.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Robot + TTT Exercise
All participants will be enrolled in this group to receive the same 60 minute study intervention consisting of wrist and shoulder-elbow robot training and TTT arm exercises. Robot + TTT exercise: The intervention will be completed 36 visits approximately 3x/week for 12-18 weeks. The training progression will be sequential with 12 visits completed on the wrist robot, followed by 12 visits on the shoulder-elbow robot and completing with 12 visits alternating sessions on the wrist and shoulder-elbow robot. Participants will perform robot training for 45 minutes with each robot followed by 15 minutes of TTT practice to complete their 60 minute intervention session.
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRobot + TTT Exercise
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

A Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment Score

The Fugl-Meyer is one of the primary outcome measures assessing change in arm use from baseline testing to mid-training after visits 12 and 24, and post-training after visit 36 and the 12 week retention period. It is a stroke-specific measure of impairment of the upper extremity that has been shown to be valid and reliable with high inter-rater and test-retest reliability. It provides a direct-observational assessment of volitional movement and motor impairment related to reflexes, sensation, and abnormal synergies. Each item on the FM is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). The scale ranges from 0-66 with higher scores representing less motor impairment.

Time frame: Immediately following the 12-week intervention

Population: Only one subject was enrolled and data collection was incomplete due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The evaluations following the 12-week intervention were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Robot + TTT ExerciseA Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment ScoreBaseline One11 units on a scale
Robot + TTT ExerciseA Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment ScoreBaseline Two12 units on a scale
Robot + TTT ExerciseA Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment ScoreAfter Visit 1213 units on a scale
Robot + TTT ExerciseA Change in the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment ScoreAfter Visit 2414 units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

A Change in Brain Connections Assessed Via MRI of the Brain

A detailed analysis of the MRI data will examine individual interregional connections to determine whether any of them are more sensitive to the intervention than others.

Time frame: Immediately following the 12-week intervention

Population: MRI was not collected as the one enrolled subject did not pass the MRI safety screening.

Other Pre-specified

A Change in Motor Evoked Potential During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

TMS stimulation of the motor cortex will be performed using MagStim 200 Magnetic Stimulators (MagStim Ltd., Wales, UK) to assess change in the motor evoked potential (MEP) of the arm muscles.

Time frame: Immediately following the 12-week intervention

Population: Only one subject was enrolled and data collection was incomplete due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The evaluations (including TMS) following the 12-week intervention were not performed.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026