Skip to content

Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancies With Unfavourable Cervix

Comparison of Intracervical and Intravaginal Application of Prostaglandin E2 for Induction of Labour in Term Pregnancies With Unfavourable Cervix

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04280874
Acronym
RAND
Enrollment
212
Registered
2020-02-21
Start date
2018-12-10
Completion date
2020-07-01
Last updated
2020-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, Prostaglandins Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use

Keywords

dinoprostone, Bishop score, labor induction, term pregnancy

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized trial comparing two prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) agents used for labor induction in pregnant women with term pregnancies and unfavorable cervix.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized trial includes pregnant women with term pregnancies, indication for labor induction and an unfavorable cervix. These women are randomized into two groups: one group is induced using an intracervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2, dinoprostone) formulation, the other using an intravaginal PGE2 formulation. Main outcome is time period between beginning of labor induction to delivery, and a reduction of four hours is considered clinically significant.

Interventions

DRUGDinoprostone 0.5 MG

0.5mg dinoprostone applied intracervically

DRUGDinoprostone 2 MG/2.5 ML Vaginal Gel/Jelly

2mg dinoprostone applied intravaginally

Sponsors

Clinical Hospital Merkur
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

two dinoprostone agents are randomly applied and compared - one in patient's cervix and the other in vagina without the patient knowing which agent is applied

Intervention model description

212 pregnant women are randomly assigned into 2 groups for application of one of two dinoprostone agents used for labor induction (intravaginal or intracervical dinoprostone)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* term pregnancies (\> 37 weeks gestation) * unfavourable cervix (Bishop score \<6) * indication for labor induction * absence of uterine contractions * reassuring cardiotocography

Exclusion criteria

* ruptured membranes * scar uterus (previous caesarean section or uterus surgery) * pregnancy complications: intrauterine growth restriction; oligohydramnios, pre-eclampsia, non-reassuring/pathological cardiotocography, cholestasis in pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, multifetal pregnancy, breech presentation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time period between beginning of labor induction to delivery5 dayshours (difference of 4 hours or more is considered significant)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of births within 24h of start of labor induction7 daysN (%)
number of deliveries by caesarean section or instrumental deliveries7 daysN (%)
number of uterus hyperstimulation7 daysN (%)

Countries

Croatia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026