Skip to content

Surgical Strategies in Moderate Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Surgical Strategies in Moderate Ischemic Mitral Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04279678
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-02-21
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Brief summary

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with a reported prevalence of 13-59%. Approximately one-third of these patients have at least moderate MR .

Detailed description

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of myocardial infarction, with a reported prevalence of 13-59%. Approximately one-third of these patients have at least moderate MR . The mechanism of IMR is complex and multifactorial.IMR results from the distortion and remodeling of the left ventricle after myocardial infarction ,where the papillary muscles are displaced away from the annular plane. Coupled with annular flattening, enlargement, and decreased contraction, this spatial deformation exerts traction on the chordae tendineae, leading to mal-coaptation of the structurally normal mitral valve and subsequently to secondary MR. Furthermore, the MR-related left ventricular(LV) volume overload promotes LV remodeling, resulting in exacerbation of the MR (MR begets more MR) . Two patterns of leaflet tethering have been reported in secondary MR: asymmetric tethering and symmetric tethering. Asymmetric tethering occurs with regional LV remodeling, resulting in displacement of the posterior papillary muscle in a lateral direction. Symmetric tethering generally results from global LV remodeling, resulting in apical tethering of both the anterior and posterior papillary muscles. Most studies show that severe IMR is not usually improved by revascularization alone and that residual MR is associated with an increased mortality risk. It is generally accepted that severe IMR should be corrected at the time of Coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG). Surgical correction of moderate IMR at the time of coronary revascularization is still an unresolved controversy.CABG alone did reduce MR at follow-up; nevertheless, CABG alone cannot be sufficient to eliminate MR in all cases , Adding mitral valve annuloplasty to CABG may eliminate MR immediately after surgery; however, recurrent MR did occur after CABG plus mitral valve annuloplasty, and no benefit for long-term survival was observed. There was also a tendency toward higher morbidity and mortality in CABG plus mitral valve procedure as compared with CABG alone in high-risk patients with moderate IMR. The latest American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS)guidelines suggested that for moderate IMR, mitral valve repair with an undersized complete rigid ring annuloplasty may be considered during CABG surgery, but not necessarily preferred over revascularization alone.Therefore ,the benefits of adding mitral valve procedure to CABG for treating moderate IMR have not been clearly established. This study is aiming to determine the short term morbidity in patients undergoing CABG alone and comparing them with patients undergoing concomitant MV repair by assessment of morbidity and mortality in both groups postoperatively .

Interventions

surgical repair of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation using pericardial patch or rigid semi-annular ring

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patient with multi-vessel coronary artery disease with moderate degree of ischemic mitral regurgitation . * Patient undergone surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. * Patient done on elective basis

Exclusion criteria

* CABG done by off-pump technique. * patients not candidates for complete revascularization. * patients with other valvular affection other than mitral valve. * Patients done on emergency basis. * patient known to have Rheumatic valvular heart disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the outcome of mitral valve repair plus CABG vs CABG alone.post operative ECHO assessment after 6 months.the aim is to determine whether there is significant difference postoperatively in patients undergoing mitral valve repair+CABG and those with CABG only regarding post operative degree of MR.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamad Z Roushdi, PhD
mzidane89@gmail.com+201006743140
Backup ContactAhmad M Kamal, Professor
aelminshawy@aun.edu.eg+201112743943

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026