Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Steroid Injections for Musculoskeletal Conditions

Comparative Effectiveness of Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Conditions

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04278833
Enrollment
165
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2021-05-28
Last updated
2025-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impingement Shoulder, Osteoarthritis, Tendinopathy

Keywords

corticosteroid injection, particulate steroid, non-particulate steroid

Brief summary

This aims of this study are: 1. To determine if particulate or non-particulate corticosteroid injections are more effective at treating pain from musculoskeletal pathologies of the hip, glenohumeral joint, biceps tendon, or subacromial/subdeltoid bursa at 2 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. 2. To determine if there is a significantly different side effect profile between particulate and non-particulate corticosteroids when used for hip, glenohumeral joint, biceps tendon, or subacromial/subdeltoid bursa injections.

Detailed description

This will be a single center, prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial of hip, glenohumeral joint, peri-tendinous biceps brachii, and subacromial/subdeltoid bursa injections comparing the efficacy of particulate (triamcinolone, betamethasone) versus non-particulate (dexamethasone) corticosteroids. Participants will be recruited for the study by trained physicians and physician extenders at Stanford orthopedic and PM&R clinics only after they have already opted for corticosteroid injection as a part of their routine medical care. The initial decision to pursue steroid injection will be based entirely on joint decision making between the patient and their medical provider prior to mention of the study. After consenting, basic demographic data, average numeric pain score (NRS) over the past week, and information on other medical interventions tried for their pain (including medication use, physical therapy, chiropractic care, and massage) will be collected. The participant will then be randomized to receive either a particulate (triamcinolone or betamethasone) or non-particulate (dexamethasone) corticosteroid, both of which are within current standards of care. Ultrasound or fluoroscopic guided injection will then be completed using sterile technique as per current clinic practice. After the injection, patients will follow up in clinic or over the phone at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and will be asked their average NRS over the past week, functional questionnaires appropriate to pertinent body parts (WOMAC, ASES, QDASH), other treatments they have tried in the interim, and for any side effects they have experienced. In addition to obtaining outcome measures, the treating physicians may order repeat injections, medications, or refer the subject to surgery, at their discretion based upon the patient's pain and functional limitations. Up to a total of three injections to the same musculoskeletal structure are allowed during the 6 month study period. Any injection into a separate space (i.e. glenohumeral joint followed by subdeltoid bursa) will be considered different structures, and follow up for the new anatomical site will begin at the time of that injection. Data collection and follow up on the previous anatomical injection site will continue on the same timeline. Data on number and timing of repeat injections, surgeries, side effects, and medications will be recorded as part of the study.

Interventions

DRUGTriamcinolone or Betamethasone

Image guided intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection

DRUGDexamethasone

Image guided intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be blinded to the type of corticosteroid (particulate or non-particulate) that they receive.

Intervention model description

Single center, prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial of hip, glenohumeral joint, biceps tendon, and subacromial bursa injections comparing the efficacy of particulate (triamcinolone, betamethasone) vs non-particulate (dexamethasone) steroids. Participants will be recruited at Stanford orthopedic and PM&R clinics only after they have already opted for steroid injection as a part of their medical care. They will be randomized to receive either a particulate or non-particulate corticosteroid, then image-guided injection will be completed as per current clinic practice. Patients will follow up in clinic or via phone at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and will be asked their NRS score, functional questionnaires, other treatments they have tried, and for any side effects experienced. The treating physician may order repeat injections, medications, or refer to surgery, at their discretion. Up to three injections to the same structure are allowed during the study period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 * Ability to provide informed consent * Capable of complying with the outcome instruments used * Capable of attending all planned follow up visits * Patient is deemed appropriate for intra-articular hip, glenohumeral, peri-tendinous biceps, or subdeltoid bursa corticosteroid injection by their treating physician for the treatment of painful musculoskeletal condition * Average pain of greater than or equal to 4/10 over the last 7 days

Exclusion criteria

* Unclear diagnosis * Pregnancy * Incarcerated patients * Prior corticosteroid injection into the same anatomical site within the last 3 months * Prior prosthetic surgery on the joint * Any condition that increases injection risk such as bleeding tendencies, uncontrolled diabetes, current active infection, or infection requiring antibiotics within the last 7 days * Chronic opioid use to control pain * Workers compensation and litigation * BMI \> 40

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From BaselineBaseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post interventionDecrease in pain compared to baseline as rated on 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS, score range from 0-10) with higher values indicating worse outcomes.
Mean Change in Average Pain From BaselineBaseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post interventionMean change in pain averaged over last 7 days compared to baseline as rated on 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS, score range from 0-10) with higher values indicating worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormBaseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post interventionThe ASES questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent glenohumeral joint, subdeltoid bursa, or peritendinous biceps injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The ASES is an 11 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexBaseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post interventionThe WOMAC questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent hip injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The WOMAC is a 24 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Number of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)6 months post initial interventionNumber (%) of participants who were referred for surgical intervention on the specific anatomical site during the study follow up period.
Number of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections6 months post initial interventionTotal number of corticosteroid injections to the specific anatomical site during the study period. The study protocol allows for a maximum of 3 injections during the 6 month study period based on the treating physician's discretion.
Change in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post interventionThe QDASH questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent glenohumeral joint, subdeltoid bursa, or peritendinous biceps injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The QDASH is an 11 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

165 participants signed informed consent, 96 were allocated to treatment

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection Site
Intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection using 10-80mg of triamcinolone or 3-9mg of betamethasone depending on anatomical structure. Injections may be repeated up to 3 times in the 6 month study period based on physician discretion.
33
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection Site
Intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection using 10-80mg of triamcinolone or 3-9mg of betamethasone depending on anatomical structure. Injections may be repeated up to 3 times in the 6 month study period based on physician discretion.
13
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection Site
Intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection using 4-10mg of dexamethasone depending on anatomical structure. Injections may be repeated up to 3 times in the 6 month study period based on physician discretion.
41
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection Site
Intra-articular, peri-tendinous, or intra-bursal corticosteroid injection using 4-10mg of dexamethasone depending on anatomical structure. Injections may be repeated up to 3 times in the 6 month study period based on physician discretion.
9
Total96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNon-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteTotalParticulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteParticulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection Site
Age, Continuous56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
10 Participants1 Participants16 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants9 Participants7 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
6 Participants0 Participants8 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
23 Participants5 Participants59 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 Participants9 Participants96 Participants33 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants7 Participants53 Participants17 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants2 Participants43 Participants16 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 130 / 410 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 130 / 410 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 130 / 410 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Average Pain From Baseline

Mean change in pain averaged over last 7 days compared to baseline as rated on 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS, score range from 0-10) with higher values indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From BaselineBaseline6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline2 weeks-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline3 months-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline6 months-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline2 weeks-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline3 months-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline6 months-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From BaselineBaseline5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline3 months-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline2 weeks-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline6 months-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From BaselineBaseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline6 months-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline2 weeks-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From BaselineBaseline5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteMean Change in Average Pain From Baseline3 months0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Comparison: Analysis of change at week 2p-value: <0.001paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 3p-value: <0.001paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 6p-value: <0.001paired t-tests
Primary

Number of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline

Decrease in pain compared to baseline as rated on 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS, score range from 0-10) with higher values indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline2 weeks4 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline6 months8 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline3 months6 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline2 weeks3 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline6 months2 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline3 months3 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline3 months18 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline2 weeks13 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline6 months13 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline2 weeks3 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline6 months0 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Pain From Baseline3 months0 Participants
Comparison: Analysis of change at week 2p-value: 0.28Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 3p-value: 0.07Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 6p-value: 0.851Chi-squared
Secondary

Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form

The ASES questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent glenohumeral joint, subdeltoid bursa, or peritendinous biceps injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The ASES is an 11 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post intervention

Population: Data collected for participants for shoulder injections only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 6 months18.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 2 weeks18.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 3 months14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormBaseline62.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 6 months23.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.2
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormBaseline61.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 3 months20.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment FormChange at 2 weeks12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Comparison: Analysis of change at week 2p-value: 0.152paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 3.p-value: 0.261paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 6.p-value: 0.437paired t-tests
Secondary

Change in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)

The QDASH questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent glenohumeral joint, subdeltoid bursa, or peritendinous biceps injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The QDASH is an 11 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post intervention

Population: Data collected for participants for shoulder injections only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Baseline41.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 2 weeks-15.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 3 months-9.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 6 months-15.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 6 months-21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Baseline49.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 3 months-17.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteChange in Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH)Change at 2 weeks-11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Comparison: Analysis of change at week 2p-value: 0.226paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 3p-value: 0.071paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 6p-value: 0.382paired t-tests
Secondary

Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index

The WOMAC questionnaire will be used for participants who underwent hip injection. The outcome of interest is the mean change in score compared to baseline. The WOMAC is a 24 item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post intervention

Population: Data collected for participants with hip injections only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexBaseline64.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 2 weeks-18.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 3 months-14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 6 months-14.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 6 months-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexBaseline62.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 3 months-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteChange in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis IndexChange at 2 weeks-10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Comparison: Analysis of change at week 2p-value: <0.001paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 3p-value: 0.021paired t-tests
Comparison: Analysis of change at month 6p-value: 0.044paired t-tests
Secondary

Number of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)

Number (%) of participants who were referred for surgical intervention on the specific anatomical site during the study follow up period.

Time frame: 6 months post initial intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)6 Participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)2 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)1 Participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants Referred for Surgical Intervention (Conversion to Surgery)2 Participants
p-value: 0.04Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections

Total number of corticosteroid injections to the specific anatomical site during the study period. The study protocol allows for a maximum of 3 injections during the 6 month study period based on the treating physician's discretion.

Time frame: 6 months post initial intervention

Population: Participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections6 participants
Particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections2 participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Shoulder Injection SiteNumber of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections2 participants
Non-particulate Corticosteroid Injection - Hip Injection SiteNumber of Participants With Repeat Corticosteroid Injections1 participants
p-value: 0.128Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026