Skip to content

PENG-block Versus FIB-block in Emergency Room

Analgesic Efficacy of PENG Block Compared to FIB Block in the Elderly Patient With Fracture of the Proximal Femur in the Emergency Room

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04278807
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-02-14
Completion date
2021-09-19
Last updated
2021-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Relief in Proximal Femoral Fracture

Brief summary

The trial aims to verify a possible greater analgesic efficacy of PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block compared to iliac fascia block (FIB block) in elderly patients (age \> 65 years) suffering from traumatic fracture of proximal femur in emergency room.

Detailed description

Prospective randomized double-blind single-center preliminary study aimed to demonstrate a possible greater analgesic efficacy of the PENG block compared to the iliac fascia block (FIB block) in elderly patients (age \> 65 years) suffering from traumatic fracture of the proximal femur in emergency room. The study will cover patients aged \> 65 years suffering from a proximal traumatic fracture of the femur who access the emergency room of Santo Spirito Hospital in Rome (ASL Roma 1).

Interventions

PROCEDURERegional Anesthesia - Nerve Blocks

Regional Anesthesia and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks

Sponsors

Santo Spirito Hospital, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 105 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all patients \> 65 years suffering from a proximal traumatic fracture of a femur who access the emergency room of Santo Spirito Hospital in Rome (ASL Rome 1), for whom surgical treatment of osteosynthesis is recommended within 48 hours in accordance with the guidelines of Regional Health System (Regione Lazio).

Exclusion criteria

* Failure to acquire written and valid informed consent * ASA \> 3 * Obesity (BMI\> 35 kg / m2) * Contraindications to performing regional anesthesia (severe coagulopathies and / or thrombocytopenia, septic state and / or infections at the block site, allergy to local anesthetics) * Patients on therapy with antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants or who regularly use opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen for chronic painful conditions; * History of alcohol or drug abuse; * Severe kidney or liver failure; * Cognitive alterations, dementia, psychiatric pathologies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of success rate of PENG block (defined as NRS score </ = 4 at 30 minutes from the blockade placement by comparing it to the analgesic effect of the FIB block, also evaluated at 30 minutes as NRS score </ = 4).30 minutes after the placement of nerve blockNumeric Rating Scale (NRS-score) evaluation, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset time and duration of nerve blockadefrom 30 minutes to 12 hoursFirst request of analgesic medication after blockade
Evaluation of rest and incident pain30 minutes after the placement of nerve blockNumeric Rating Scale (NRS-score) evaluation, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Use of rescue-medication in pain treatmentfrom 30 minutes to 12 hoursAnalgesic drugs administered at the request of the patient in the case of blockade failure
Check for any complications related to analgesic (PENG and FIB) blocksfrom 30 minutes to 12 hoursRecording of any complications related to PENG and FIB blocks

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026