Skip to content

Intralesional Vitamin D Injection for Treatment of Common Warts

Efficacy of Intralesional Vitamin D Injection for Treatment of Common Warts: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04278573
Enrollment
77
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-10-20
Completion date
2023-04-04
Last updated
2024-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Warts

Brief summary

Researchers are trying to find out if injecting Vitamin D into a wart is an effective treatment.

Interventions

DRUGVitamin D3

Intralesional injection of 0.3 ml 40,000 IU/ml vitamin D3 into one wart

DRUGPlacebo

0.3 ml injection of sterilized sesame oil with no active study ingredient

Sponsors

Stephen P. Merry
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients seen at the Mayo Clinic Rochester practices * Patients suffering from one or more cutaneous warts as diagnosed by the examining physician at baseline visit on typical diagnostic characteristics * Able to provide consent * Both recalcitrant and non-recalcitrant warts will be included

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with prior use of home or office-based destructive treatments for this wart(s) in the last 1 month with salicylic acid (SA) or cryotherapy * Immunoadjuvant therapy for warts in the last 4 months (e.g Candida) * History of vitamin D injection of warts ever * High-dose vitamin D supplementation (\>4,000 IU daily or equivalent) in the preceding 3 months * Pregnancy or lactation * Facial or genital warts * Lesions not felt by the examining clinician to be a wart (e.g., corns or calluses) * Immunosuppression (to include immunosuppressive medications or conditions as judged by the physician evaluating the patient at the baseline visit). * Allergy to sesame oil

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Regression of Wart24 weeksNumber of subjects to have a complete resolution of cutaneous wart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Regression of Wart at 4 Weeks4 weeksNumber of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 4 weeks.
Regression of Wart at 8 Weeks8 weeksNumber of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 8 weeks.
Regression of Wart at 12 Weeks12 weeksNumber of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 12 weeks.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vitamin D3 Treatment Group
Subjects will receive a Vitamin D3 injection into their wart Vitamin D3: Intralesional injection of 0.3 ml 40,000 IU/ml vitamin D3 into one wart
41
Placebo Group
Subjects will receive a placebo injection into their wart Placebo: 0.3 ml injection of sterilized sesame oil with no active study ingredient
36
Total77

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVitamin D3 Treatment GroupTotalPlacebo Group
Age, Continuous36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
41 Participants75 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
41 Participants77 Participants36 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants77 participants36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants58 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 410 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 4136 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Regression of Wart

Number of subjects to have a complete resolution of cutaneous wart

Time frame: 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vitamin D3 Treatment GroupComplete Regression of Wart12 Participants
Placebo GroupComplete Regression of Wart10 Participants
Secondary

Regression of Wart at 12 Weeks

Number of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vitamin D3 Treatment GroupRegression of Wart at 12 Weeks7 Participants
Placebo GroupRegression of Wart at 12 Weeks8 Participants
Secondary

Regression of Wart at 4 Weeks

Number of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 4 weeks.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vitamin D3 Treatment GroupRegression of Wart at 4 Weeks2 Participants
Placebo GroupRegression of Wart at 4 Weeks2 Participants
Secondary

Regression of Wart at 8 Weeks

Number of participants who experienced complete regression of cutaneous wart at 8 weeks.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Vitamin D3 Treatment GroupRegression of Wart at 8 Weeks4 Participants
Placebo GroupRegression of Wart at 8 Weeks7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026