Skip to content

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A 96-week, Two-arm, Randomized, Single-masked, Multi-center, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab 6 mg Compared to Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04278417
Acronym
CONDOR
Enrollment
689
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-11-19
Completion date
2024-08-19
Last updated
2025-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Keywords

proliferative diabetic retinophathy, retinal neovascularization, anti-VEGF, brolucizumab, intravitreal injection, panretinal photocoagulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to panretinal photocoagulation laser (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This evaluation will provide information that brolucizumab is non-inferior to PRP with respect to the change in best corrected visual acuity at Week 54.

Detailed description

Phase III, 96-week, two-arm, randomized (1:1 ratio), single-masked, multi-center, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab compared to Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in subjects with Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Subjects who consented underwent screening assessments to evaluate their eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatments: Brolucizumab 6 mg: 3 x q6w loading then q12w maintenance through Week 90, with the option from Week 48 onwards to extend the treatment interval by 6 weeks at a time up to 24 weeks, and revert to q12w if disease worsens. More frequent injection with q6w interval in the maintenance phase could be administered at the discretion of the Investigator if the disease worsens. PRP: initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment (may split into 2-4 sessions) as needed up to Week 90. Visits occurred every 6 weeks throughout the study, regardless of treatment or not.

Interventions

3 x q6w loading injections, followed by q12w maintenance through Week 90

PROCEDUREPanretinal photocoagulation laser

initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed with additional PRP treatment as needed

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation * Able to complete adequate fundus photographs and retinal images * Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and HbA1c less than or equal to 12% at screening * DM treatment stable for at least 3 months * PDR diagnosis with no previous PRP treatment in the study eye

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye at Screening or Baseline that could compromise a response to study treatment. * Presence of diabetic macular edema in the study eye * Active infection or inflammation in the study eye * Uncontrolled glaucoma (IOP greater than 25 mmHg) * Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment within 6 months * Treatment with intraocular corticosteroids * End stage renal disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplant * Uncontrolled blood pressure * Systemic anti-VEGF therapy at any time Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study EyeBaseline, Week 54BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study EyeWeek 96Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of No PDR is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study EyeUp to Week 54Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study EyeUp to Week 96Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser
Area Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study EyeBaseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values. The AUC in change from Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 (or Week 96) is referred to as the averaged change from Baseline in BCVA at each visit up to 54 (or Week 96), which was calculated as (BCVA at Week 6 + BCVA at Week 12 + ... + BCVA at Week 54 (or Week 96)) / number of visits with valid BCVA data from Week 6 to Week 54 (or Week 96) - BCVA at Baseline.
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.
Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study EyeWeek 54Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of No PDR is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96up to Week 54 and up to Week 96The vision-threatening complications associated with Diabetic retinopathy (DR) are defined as any event of the following list occurring in the study eye at any time point after Baseline: * Center-involved Diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) as defined as Central sub-field thickness (CSFT) ≥280 µm according to Central reading center (CRC) evaluation of Optical coherent tomography (OCT) image * Retinal detachment * Vitreous hemorrhage * Neovascular glaucoma, iris/ anterior chamber angle neovascularization * Vitrectomy for DR complications
Ocular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study EyeAdverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.
Non-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermAdverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.
Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, India, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Brolucizumab 6 mg
Brolucizumab 6 mg: 3 x q6w loading then q12w maintenance through Week 90, with the option from Week 48 onwards to extend the treatment interval by 6 weeks at a time up to 24 weeks and revert to q12w if disease worsens. More frequent injection with q6w interval in the maintenance phase could be administered at the discretion of the Investigator if the disease worsens.
347
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser Arm
Initial treatment in 1-4 sessions up to Week 12, followed by additional PRP treatment as needed.
342
Total689

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event35
Overall StudyDeath89
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1113
Overall StudyPhysician Decision46
Overall StudyProgressive disease02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPanretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmTotalBrolucizumab 6 mg
Age, Continuous54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
53.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39
53.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
148 Participants305 Participants157 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants38 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
169 Participants335 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
132 Participants276 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
210 Participants413 Participants203 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 3479 / 34217 / 689
other
Total, other adverse events
241 / 347254 / 342495 / 689
serious
Total, serious adverse events
96 / 347105 / 342201 / 689

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye

BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 54

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Brolucizumab 6 mgChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye0.2 Letters ReadStandard Error 0.72
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmChange From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 54 for the Study Eye-4.2 Letters ReadStandard Error 0.73
Comparison: 1p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.4, 6.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: 2p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Area Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eye

BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of \>= 34 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) at Screening / Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values. The AUC in change from Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 (or Week 96) is referred to as the averaged change from Baseline in BCVA at each visit up to 54 (or Week 96), which was calculated as (BCVA at Week 6 + BCVA at Week 12 + ... + BCVA at Week 54 (or Week 96)) / number of visits with valid BCVA data from Week 6 to Week 54 (or Week 96) - BCVA at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 54 and up to Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Brolucizumab 6 mgArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eyeup to Week 540.5 Letters read
Brolucizumab 6 mgArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eyeup to Week 96-0.1 Letters read
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eyeup to Week 54-3.2 Letters read
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmArea Under the Curve in Change From Baseline in BCVA up to Week 54 and up to Week 96 - for the Study Eyeup to Week 96-4.3 Letters read
Secondary

Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96

Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=282, 279)128 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=295, 289)123 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=282, 279)57 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=295, 289)65 Participants
Comparison: Week 54p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.5, 33.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96

Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set- Observed, for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=225,220)6 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=236, 201)18 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=225,220)31 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥2 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=236, 201)27 Participants
Secondary

Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96

Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=282, 279)58 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=295, 289)49 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=282, 279)30 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Improvement From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=295, 289)33 Participants
Secondary

Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96

Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 54 and Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set-Observed, for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=225, 220)4 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=236, 201)11 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 54 (n=225, 220)16 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmDiabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number and Percentage of Subjects With ≥3 Steps Worsening From Baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) DRSS Score at Week 54 and Week 96Week 96 (n=236, 201)16 Participants
Secondary

Non-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermPyrexia15 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperlipidaemia9 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNasopharyngitis22 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperuricaemia9 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperglycaemia13 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermChronic kidney disease8 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCOVID-1944 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDepression8 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperkalaemia12 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermBlood glucose increased7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermAnaemia15 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHypercholesterolaemia7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermUrinary tract infection12 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNausea7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermUpper respiratory tract infection28 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermType 2 diabetes mellitus7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetes mellitus10 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermArthralgia5 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCough15 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermInfluenza5 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermPneumonia10 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term-Vomiting5 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHypertension35 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetic neuropathy2 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCoronary artery disease9 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetic foot1 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNumber of subjects with at least one AE226 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetic foot7 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNumber of subjects with at least one AE217 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCOVID-1947 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHypertension24 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermUpper respiratory tract infection16 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNasopharyngitis16 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermAnaemia15 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCough10 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermPyrexia7 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperglycaemia10 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperkalaemia2 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermUrinary tract infection13 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetes mellitus5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermPneumonia4 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermCoronary artery disease5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperlipidaemia8 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHyperuricaemia4 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermChronic kidney disease5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDepression3 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermBlood glucose increased5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermHypercholesterolaemia5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermNausea6 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermType 2 diabetes mellitus6 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermArthralgia7 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermInfluenza8 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term-Vomiting9 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNon-ocular AEs (≥ 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred TermDiabetic neuropathy10 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96

The vision-threatening complications associated with Diabetic retinopathy (DR) are defined as any event of the following list occurring in the study eye at any time point after Baseline: * Center-involved Diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) as defined as Central sub-field thickness (CSFT) ≥280 µm according to Central reading center (CRC) evaluation of Optical coherent tomography (OCT) image * Retinal detachment * Vitreous hemorrhage * Neovascular glaucoma, iris/ anterior chamber angle neovascularization * Vitrectomy for DR complications

Time frame: up to Week 54 and up to Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - Observed, for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96up to Week 54117 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96up to Week 96144 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96up to Week 54258 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects Developing Vision-threatening Complications Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy up to Week 54 and up to Week 96up to Week 96270 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study Eye

Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser

Time frame: Up to Week 54

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study Eye108 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 54 for the Study Eye248 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-48, -34.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study Eye

Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. PRP = Panretinal photocoagulation laser

Time frame: Up to Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study Eye126 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI- DME) up to Week 96 for the Study Eye262 Participants
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study Eye

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of No PDR is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.

Time frame: Week 54

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study Eye187 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 54 for the Study Eye65 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [32, 46.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study Eye

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is derived from the diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) as assessed by the central reading center (CRC) using 7-field color fundus photography image. The DRSS on the original score with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR) were then converted into a 12-level scale (Range is from 1 - diabetic retinopathy (DR) absent, to 12- very advanced PDR). (A lower score represents a better outcome.) The event of No PDR is then defined as DRSS (12-level scale) \< 7.

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set- Last Observation Carried Forward (FAS - LOCF), for patients with a valid measurement with no protocol deviations with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study Eye188 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmNumber and Percentage of Subjects With no Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Week 96 for the Study Eye86 Participants
Secondary

Ocular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. AEs that started after alternative diabetic retinopathy treatment/relevant diabetic macular edema treatment in the study eye are censored.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment up to Week 90, plus approximately 6 weeks post-treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Macular oedema9 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Dry eye15 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous floaters9 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study EyeNumber of subjects with at least one AE152 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctivitis7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Intraocular pressure increased12 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diabetic retinal oedema7 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract26 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal hemorrhage5 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diabetic retinopathy4 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctival hemorrhage10 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pain3 Participants
Brolucizumab 6 mgOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous hemorrhage38 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pain7 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study EyeNumber of subjects with at least one AE199 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous hemorrhage83 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract27 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Dry eye8 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Intraocular pressure increased3 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctival hemorrhage5 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Macular oedema34 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous floaters9 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctivitis4 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diabetic retinal oedema36 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diabetic retinopathy13 Participants
Panretinal Photocoagulation Laser ArmOcular AEs (>= 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal hemorrhage12 Participants
Post Hoc

All Collected Deaths

On-treatment deaths are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment at the time of the interim analysis, plus 4 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks. Post-treatment deaths are reported for the timeframe of greater than 30 days after last treatment, also up to Week 96. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment deaths.

Time frame: On-treatment - within 30 days after last treatment, up to Week 96; Post-treatment - greater than 30 days after last treatment, also up to Week 96.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026