Skip to content

Study of the AERin Medical Vivaer® ARC Stylus for Nasal AirWAY Obstruction

A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AERin Medical Vivaer® ARC Stylus for Nasal AirWAY Obstruction (AERWAY)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04277507
Acronym
AERWAY
Enrollment
122
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-02-07
Completion date
2024-10-11
Last updated
2025-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Obstruction

Keywords

Nasal valve, Nasal airway obstruction

Brief summary

Post-market study to continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vivaer® ARC Stylus for nasal airway obstruction

Detailed description

Prospective, Multicenter, Non-randomized Study of the Aerin Medical Vivaer® ARC Stylus for Nasal Airway Obstruction to continue to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vivaer® ARC Stylus for treating the nasal valve area to improve symptoms in those diagnosed with nasal airway obstruction.

Interventions

Delivery of low-power, temperature-controlled, radiofrequency energy to the tissues of the internal nasal valve area

Sponsors

Aerin Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 or older 2. Willing and able to provide informed consent 3. Willing and able to comply with the study protocol 4. Seeking treatment for nasal obstruction 5. NOSE score of ≥ 60 at Baseline 6. Nasal valve is a primary or significant contributor to the subject's nasal obstruction as determined by the study investigator (based on clinical presentation, physical examination, nasal endoscopy, etc.) and the subject has a positive response to any of the following temporary measures (based on patient history or office exam): * Use of external nasal dilator strips (e.g., Breathe Right Strips) * Q-Tip test (manual intranasal lateralization) * Use of nasal stents * Cottle Maneuver (manual lateral retraction of the cheek)

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior surgical treatment of the nasal valve 2. Rhinoplasty, septoplasty, inferior turbinate reduction or other surgical nasal procedures within the past three (3) months 3. Anatomy that requires an adjunctive surgical nasal procedure on the same day or 3 months after the Vivaer procedure 4. Medical conditions which in the opinion of the treating physician would predispose the subject to poor wound healing or increased surgical risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores From Baseline to 3 Months3 MonthMean change in NOSE score from Baseline to 3 months.Scores may range from the best score of 0, meaning no nasal obstructive symptoms to the worst score of 100, meaning severe nasal obstructive symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores in Relation to the Area Treated by the Study Procedure3 months post study procedureThe Pain VAS will be used to rate pain associated with the treatment (Hawker, Mian et al. 2011). Subjects are asked to mark their pain level on a 10 cm line anchored by verbal descriptors: 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. The study staff will measure with a metric ruler from the 0, the beginning of the line, to the vertical mark made by the subject. The result, expressed in millimeters, will represent the subject's VAS Pain Score with 100 being the worst pain imaginable.
Subject Reported Change in Medication Use for Nasal Obstruction Symptoms24 MonthEvaluate change (reduction) in medication used for nasal obstruction symptoms from Baseline to follow up timepoints post study procedure of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Change in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)Scores From Baseline to 24 Months - Analysis24 MonthsMean change in NOSE score from Baseline to 24 months post study procedure. Scores may range from the best score of 0, meaning no nasal obstructive symptoms to the worst score of 100, meaning sever nasal obstructive symptoms

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study enrollment was Up to 125 treated patients to be enrolled in the study at up to 20 sites (medical clinics) in the United States. Recruitment occurred 01FEB2020 - 26AUG2020.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vivaer Treatment
Intervention: Procedure: thermal treatment of submucosal tissue including cartilage in the internal nasal valve area Vivaer Stylus: Delivery of low-power, temperature-controlled, radiofrequency energy to the tissues of the internal nasal valve area
122
Total122

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCompleted through 24M but not interested in extension to 36M3
Overall StudyData missing for full evaluation5
Overall StudyDeath due to COVID-191
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up17
Overall StudyReceived Treatment Outside of Study that could affect study results2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVivaer Treatment
Additional Nasal Obstruction Diagnosis
Nasal Polyps
3 Participants
Additional Nasal Obstruction Diagnosis
Nasal Valve Stenosis
64 Participants
Additional Nasal Obstruction Diagnosis
Septal Deviation
34 Participants
Additional Nasal Obstruction Diagnosis
Septal Turbinate (Nasal Septal Body)
37 Participants
Additional Nasal Obstruction Diagnosis
Turbinate Enlargement
31 Participants
Age, Customized
<60 years
83 Participants
Age, Customized
>=60 years
39 Participants
Baseline NOSE Scale Score80.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Body Mass Index27.6 Kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
History of Nasal Surgery67 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Bilateral Dynamic
68 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Bilateral Static
47 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Unilateral Dynamic
2 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Unilateral Dynamic and Unilateral Static
2 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Unilateral Static
1 Participants
Nasal Valve Collapse Mechanism
Unreported
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, White
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American, White
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Declined Available Choices
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 122
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores From Baseline to 3 Months

Mean change in NOSE score from Baseline to 3 months.Scores may range from the best score of 0, meaning no nasal obstructive symptoms to the worst score of 100, meaning severe nasal obstructive symptoms.

Time frame: 3 Month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol Eligible SubjectsChange in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores From Baseline to 3 Months-47.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 26.1
Other Pre-specified

Change in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)Scores From Baseline to 24 Months - Analysis

Mean change in NOSE score from Baseline to 24 months post study procedure. Scores may range from the best score of 0, meaning no nasal obstructive symptoms to the worst score of 100, meaning sever nasal obstructive symptoms

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: A total of 1010 patients reached 2 year follow-up, of which, 12 had an additional nasal procedure and were reviewed separately

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol Eligible SubjectsChange in Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)Scores From Baseline to 24 Months - Analysis57 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8213
Other Pre-specified

Subject Reported Change in Medication Use for Nasal Obstruction Symptoms

Evaluate change (reduction) in medication used for nasal obstruction symptoms from Baseline to follow up timepoints post study procedure of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Time frame: 24 Month

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Protocol Eligible SubjectsSubject Reported Change in Medication Use for Nasal Obstruction Symptoms31 Participants
Subjects Using Nasal Sprays for NAO SymptomsSubject Reported Change in Medication Use for Nasal Obstruction Symptoms34 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores in Relation to the Area Treated by the Study Procedure

The Pain VAS will be used to rate pain associated with the treatment (Hawker, Mian et al. 2011). Subjects are asked to mark their pain level on a 10 cm line anchored by verbal descriptors: 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. The study staff will measure with a metric ruler from the 0, the beginning of the line, to the vertical mark made by the subject. The result, expressed in millimeters, will represent the subject's VAS Pain Score with 100 being the worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: 3 months post study procedure

Population: All treated subjects VAS score at 3 months post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protocol Eligible SubjectsSubject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores in Relation to the Area Treated by the Study Procedure4.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 8.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026