Skip to content

HA-WBRT vs SRS in Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases

Hippocampal Avoidance Whole Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) in Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04277403
Acronym
HipSter
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-02-20
Start date
2020-02-15
Completion date
2023-02-28
Last updated
2021-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Metastases

Keywords

brain metastases, hippocampal avoidance, radiosurgery

Brief summary

This study compares the effectiveness and safety of two radiation treatment techniques for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Detailed description

For patients suffering from multiple brain metastases whole brain radiation therapy still constitutes a standard therapy. However, because of the risk of neurocognitive side effects as well as reduced local tumor control, employment of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more common. The disadvantage of SRS alone may be poor intracranial tumor control because of frequent appearance of new distant brain metastases after therapy. In recent years hippocampal avoidance whole brain therapy has been shown to minimize treatment related side effects while reducing the rate of distant intracranial failure. In this study patients will be randomized to receive either hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy with integrated tumor boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) or stereotactic radiosurgery. The investigators hypothesize that HA-WBRT+SIB can improve intracranial tumor control compared to stereotactic radiosurgery, while avoiding additional neurocognitive side effects.

Interventions

RADIATIONHippocampal Avoiding Whole Brain Radiation Therapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost

Hippocampal avoiding Whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a prescribed dose of 30Gy in 12 fractions, 2.5Gy per fraction and a simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) to each brain metastasis of 51Gy to 95% of PTV in 12 Fractions, 4.25Gy per fraction.

RADIATIONSingle session or hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery

Single session or hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases. Single session SRS will be delivered in 18 to 22Gy to the tumour encompassing 80% Isodose. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HfSRS) will be delivered in 5 sessions of 6Gy each to the tumour encompassing 80% isodose.

Sponsors

Medical University Innsbruck
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Observer-blinding

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 4 and not exceeding 15 brain metastases not exceeding a combined total volume of 25ml and not previously treated with radiotherapy * KPI ≥ 70, ECOG ≤ 2 * Age ≥ 18 years, Male or female

Exclusion criteria

* Neuroendocrine, SCLC, germinoma or lymphoma histology * Brain stem metastasis * Life expectancy \< 3 months * Suspicion of meningeosis carcinomatosa * Previous WBRT * Inability to participate in radiologic follow-up, contraindication to MR imaging (e.g. not MRI compatible pacemaker, severe claustrophobia) * Inability to participate in neurocognitive function testing, insufficient German language skills, aphasia, graphomotor impairment, insufficient vision, insufficient attention span * Pregnancy, nursing or unwillingness to prevent pregnancy using effective methods of contraception during treatment * Known abuse of medication, drugs or alcohol * Known severe dementia (z-score \< 2) or major cognitive function disorder that is not caused by intracranial tumour * Known clinical depression or psychotic disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intracranial Progression free survivalup to 18 monthssurvival with freedom from both local and distant intracranial progression, measured in months from end of treatment until progression or death, assessed in follow-up imaging (MRI, FET-PET)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurocognitive function assessed by COWATup to 18 monthsChange of z-scores of COWAT (controlled oral word association test) to baseline examination
Neurocognitive function assessed by TMTup to 18 monthsChange of z-scores of TMT (trail making test) to baseline examination
Local control rateup to 18 monthsrate of progression of treated metastases assessed in follow-up imaging (MRI, FET-PET)
Neurocognitive function assessed by VLMTup to 18 monthsChange of z-scores of VLMT (Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest) to baseline examination
Quality of Life Score assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaireup to 18 monthsChange in Quality of Life Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of life core module) relative to baseline
Quality of Life Score assessed by QLQ-BN20 questionnaireup to 18 monthsChange in Quality of Life Score of QLQ-BN20 (quality of life brain cancer module) relative to baseline
Survival timeup to 18 monthstime from end of treatment to death

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactJulian Mangesius, MD
julian.mangesius@i-med.ac.at

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026