Skip to content

Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN): TCU Clinical Research Center

Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN): TCU Clinical Research Center

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04276792
Acronym
JCOIN_TCU
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-02-19
Start date
2021-10-07
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Addiction, Opioid

Brief summary

There are two study periods for the TCU JCOIN project. The primary aims of Study 1 (approved by the TCU IRB) are (1) to gather information from staff on the current treatment referral process within participating communities and (2) to learn about the existing interrelationships between medical and community behavioral health (CBH) providers. TCU IRB granted approval for Phase 1 on 11/07/19, approval number: 1920-60-AM1. Study 2 (under current review by the TCU IRB) includes recruitment across 18 community collaboration sites across 3 states; these communities will participate in the TCU Opioid-Treatment Linkage Model (O-TLM) protocol. The O-TLM is focused on best practices for improving screening, identifying and linking to MOUD providers, reducing stigma, and addressing other important factors that impact justice-involved individuals returning to their communities. Along with their agency records, information collected from justice-involved individuals within the target communities will be examined to assess O-TLM impact on improving public health and public safety outcomes. Furthermore, stakeholder staff across community organizations, including criminal justice and treatment agencies, will be asked to complete surveys on the O-TLM regarding its acceptability and adoption, as well as on best training strategies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTCU Opioid-Treatment Linkage Model (O-TLM)

The O-TLM is focused on best practices for improving screening, identifying and linking to MOUD providers, reducing stigma, and addressing other important factors that impact justice-involved individuals returning to their communities.

Sponsors

University of New Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER
Loyola University
CollaboratorOTHER
Texas Christian University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Our design is a Hybrid Type 3 design with the primary aim to compare 2 implementation strategies, and a secondary aim to assess client-level outcomes associated with the trial; the design includes a cluster randomized parallel design with staggered starts

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* client level participant eligibility includes having a history of opioid use or at risk for opioid use; being released to a participating community while under supervision * staff level participant eligibility includes being a key member of a participating community and involved in the service assessment and referral process of justice-involved individuals.

Exclusion criteria

* no history of opioid use or being at risk of opioid use; not being released to a participating community. * staff level participant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Public Health assessed by decrease in days and amount of illicit drug use, including opioids6 months and 12 months post-releasedecreases in days and amount of illicit drug use, including opioids assessed through client interviews using the timeline follow-back method
Public Safety as assessed through reduction in rearrest rates6 months and 12 months post-releasereductions in rearrest rates measured through justice and department of pubic safety records
Increase in Access to Services6 months and 12 months post-releasereferral rate increase as self-reported through client interviews and provided through justice records
Increase in Retention in Services6 months and 12 months post-releaseappointments kept as self-reported through client interviews and provided through justice and provider records

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systems Impact as assessed through improved intervention attitudes6 and 12 months post implementation startstaff attitudes of intervention acceptability as assessed through survey
Systems Impact as assessed through intervention cost6 and 12 months post implementation startaccumulated cost of intervention

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJennifer Becan, PhD
j.becan@tcu.edu18172576518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026