Skip to content

The Effect of Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques on Pain and Functionality in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

The Effect of Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques on Pain and Functionality in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04273568
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-02-18
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2020-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Shoulder pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques applied in addition to exercise therapy in patients with Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) on pain, pressure pain threshold (PPT), range of motion (ROM), functionality, scapular dyskinesis, active trigger points and emotional state.

Detailed description

32 patients between the ages of 20-60 diagnosed with SIS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. The exercise group received an exercise program of 12 sessions. Scapular PNF techniques were applied to the PNF group with the same exercise program. Patients were evaluated twice; one before and one after 6 weeks of treatment; using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, algometer for PPT, digital goniometer for range of motion (ROM), The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) for functional status, lateral scapular slide test (LSST) for scapular dyskinesis, Travell and Simons criteria for trigger point and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for emotional state. At the end of treatment patient satisfaction was evaluated with Global Change Scale.

Interventions

Rhythmic initiation and repetitive stretching techniques in scapula anterior elevation-posterior depression and anterior depression-posterior elevation patterns were applied twice a week for 6 weeks.

OTHERExercise program

An exercise program consisting of exercises used in the conservative treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome for both groups was applied twice a week for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Tuğba Akgüller
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 20 and 60 * Diagnosed with SIS by MRI and clinical examination and a specialist physician * Positive impingement tests (Hawkings, Neer and Jobe test) or painful motion arc (60 ° -120 °) * Unilateral shoulder pain that has been going on for at least 3 months * Signed voluntary consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis or massive rotator cuff tear * Having undergone upper limb surgery * Presence of rheumatological systemic diseases * Presence of Glenohumeral instability * Having a neurological disease affecting the upper extremity * Diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy * Degenerative joint disorders * Having communication problems * Steroid injection therapy or physiotherapy in the past 6 months have been rehabilitated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Functional Status of the patients at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksThe functional status of the patients were evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). DASH is a scale consisting of 30 questions that question the functional status and symptoms used in musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity.The number of Likert scale (1: no difficulty, 5: I can not do at all) is used in answering the questions and the total score obtained is between 0 and 100.
Change from Baseline Pain intensity of the patients at 6 weeksBaseline and 6 weeksPain intensity of the patients at rest, during activity and at night was assessed using the VAS; Visual Analog Scale. In this evaluation, individuals were told that the number 0 on the 10 cm long horizontal line expresses no pain, and the number 10 indicates unbearable pain and that individuals should mark their intensity of pain on this line.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)Baseline and 6 weeksPressure pain threshold was evaluated using the Algometer (dolorimeter).
Scapular dyskinesisBaseline and 6 weeksScapular Dyskinesis was evaluated with The Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSKT). In this test, the distance of the inferior angle of the scapula to the nearest spinous process at 3 different positions (0°, 40-45°, 90°) is measured, and a difference of 1 cm or more between the two sides in any of the three positions is considered positive for scapular dyskinesis.
Emotional stateBaseline and 6 weeksThe emotional states of the cases were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), which consists of 14 questions. (HAD). This scale has a 7-question anxiety (HAD-A) subscale that evaluates the anxiety state, and a 7-question depression (HAD-D) subscale that evaluates the state of depression, and a four-point likert scale is used to answer the questions. For the total score of each sub-score, 0-7 points are normal, 8-10 points are at the border, and 11 points are defined as abnormal
Active trigger pointsBaseline and 6 weeksActive trigger points were evaluated by palpation method according to Travell and Simons criteria. Scalene, upper trapezius, levator scapula, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subskapularis, teres minor, teres major, deltoid anterior, middle and posterior group fibers, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, biceps brachii muscles were evaluated with palpation method in terms of trigger point presence.
Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)Baseline and 6 weeksEHA evaluations of flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation of the shoulder joint were performed in the supine position using the digital goniometer.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction: Global Rating of Change (GRC) scaleAt the end of the 6-weeks treatmentPatient Satisfaction was assessed Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale. The scale used included 5 points (-2: I am much worse. -1: I am worse, 0: I am the same, +1: I am better, +2: I am much better).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026