Skip to content

PET/CT Whole-body Dynamic Acquisition at FDG to Metastatic Melanoma Under Immunotherapy

Interest in PET/CT Whole-body Dynamic Acquisition at FDG to Differentiate Progression/Pseudo Progression of Metastatic Melanoma Under Immunotherapy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04272658
Acronym
IMMUNOPET2
Enrollment
56
Registered
2020-02-17
Start date
2020-06-26
Completion date
2026-06-26
Last updated
2024-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Melanoma

Brief summary

The value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG PET / CT to differentiate progression / pseudo-progression during the first therapeutic assessment (PET1) of metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)to predict the progression of the disease..

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTvalue of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG

differentiate pseudo-progression / progression during the first therapeutic assessment by FDG PET / CT (PET1) using data from the 4D whole-body dynamic acquisition, without having to re-evaluate closely. during a PET1 'this unconfirmed progression after 2 new treatment cures of ICI

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient old ≥ 18 years * With metastatic melanoma * Treated with anti-PD1 : Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Combo IPI-Nivo * Having formulated a non-opposition

Exclusion criteria

* \- Minor patient \< 18 years * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Other type of tumor than metastatic melanoma * Non-eligibility for the examination * Refusal of participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Values of the Ki absorption coefficient resulting from a FDG PET / CT full-body 4D dynamic acquisition to differentiate the pseudo-progression / progression of metastatic melanoma treated with ICI5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between the Ki lesion values derived from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 histological specifications of the tumors (% PD-L1, T-CD8 infiltration, PTEN status) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression.5 years
Correlation between the Ki lesional values resulting from the 4D acquisition of the PET / CT from PET1 and PET0 the biological parameters (LDH, leucocytes, neutrophils) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years
Correlation between the Ki lesion values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years
Correlation between lesional Ki values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 ICI- related adverse effect to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactRonan ABGRAL, MD-PhD
ronan.abgral@chu-brest.fr+33 (0) 298223327
Backup ContactKarim AMRANE, MD
amranekarim@ymail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026