Skip to content

New Periodontal Classification

Periodontal Diseases Classification: Old is Gold or New is Bold

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04271787
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-02-17
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2019-11-04
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Diseases, Peri-Implantitis, Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

Classification, Periodontal diseases, Periodontitis, Peri-implantitis

Brief summary

A new classification system of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions was proposed by consensus of world experts in 2017. Since then there has been ongoing debates among periodontists regarding the application of the new classification. This study aims to shed light on the current understanding of the new classification among Egyptian periodontists.

Detailed description

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Dentistry Beni-Suef University (ID #FDBSUREC/27022019/AM) and was conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1975, revised in 2003. The questionnaire was anonymous with no personal identification data. Completion and submission of the questionnaire was considered an approved informed consent to participate in the study by the Research Ethic Committee. The questionnaire was designed by the authors and pilot tested among a group of 12 periodontists for validation. Afterwards, adjustments were made to ensure a clear and comprehensive version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire had a cover letter explaining the nature and purpose of the survey and comprised 15 questions. The first six statements of the questionnaire were descriptive in nature addressing the participant's demographics, and the seventh was a question whether the participant is aware of the new PDL classification or not. Only those who were aware of it were asked to proceed to 13 multiple choice questions using Likert scale; ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree or from excellent to poor, in addition to I don't know option (8). There were also three open ended questions for further comments at the end of the questionnaire.

Interventions

OTHERquestionnaire

Questionnaire

Sponsors

Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER
Beni-Suef University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL

Inclusion criteria

* periodontists

Exclusion criteria

* non periodontists

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
significant predictors of satisfaction with the new classification.4 monthsBinary logistic Regression analysis to determine significant predictors of new classification application. Ordinal Regression analysis to determine significant predictors of satisfaction with the new classification.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026