Skip to content

Investigation of an Abdominal Compression Device

Analysis of an Abdominal Compression Device to Reduce Respiratory Motion of Lower Thorax and Abdominal Tumours

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04270890
Acronym
ACE02
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-02-17
Start date
2018-06-21
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Lung, Cancer of Stomach

Keywords

ablative stereotactic radiotherapy,, lung cancer, compression device

Brief summary

This study is applicable to patients undergoing lower lung or abdomen stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment. The purpose of the ACE 01 study is to identify if, the volume of healthy tissue within the treatment area and therefore subsequent side effects, can be reduced by using a commercially available abdominal compression device to minimise breathing related movement. The secondary aim will be to assess patient compliance and comfort of thedevice. This will be assessed by asking the patient to complete a 'patient comfort questionnaire'. In addition the radiographers will be asked to complete a 'satisfaction questionnaire' to determine ease and reproducibility of use.

Detailed description

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) offers the ability to deliver a high dose of radiotherapy accurately to small tumours. It is an established, effective, non-invasive treatment option for early lung cancers as an alternative to surgery and in the treatment of limited spread of cancer (called oligo-metastatic disease) in the context of clinical trials (CORE, SARON, ABC-07 etc.). In order to deliver a high dose of radiation without damaging the surrounding structures, an accurate map of the tumour and the surrounding organs and their relationship to each other when moving (for e.g. during breathing) is important. This is usually achieved by getting a radiotherapy treatment planning 4 dimensional CT scan (4D-CT). When either the tumour or organ around them (like the lung) are moving excessively it becomes difficult to target the radiation beams and often the only solution is to treat a larger volume which covers the extent of the movement. Treating larger volumes often leads to more toxicity to the surrounding tissues.Therefore managing motion is critical to increasing tumour control probability (TCP) and reducing normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). In this context, the question of reducing the movement caused by breathing, of tumours in the lower lung and upper abdomen (like the liver, adrenals, kidney etc) is an area of intense interest. Various technical and physical methods exist to help improve motion management in patients under going radiotherapy. By limiting the movement, the target volume is smaller and this enables treatment of the tumour to high doses with lesser toxicity as some of the toxicity of radiotherapy is proportionate to the volume treated i.e. lower the volume of treatment lesser the risk of toxicity. Abdominal compression is one such method and is well accepted to be beneficial in reducing tumour motion. However, many of the previous studies require expensive and resource intensive immobilisation devices, costing, in many cases in excess of £10,000. This study will investigate the use of an independent compression device which can be used with any existing immobilisation system and costs in the region of £1,500. If proven to be beneficial this will allow many smaller centres or centres with budget limitations to also achieve the benefits of abdominal compression without extensive resource and cost requirements.

Interventions

DEVICEAbdominal compression belt system

The abdominal compression belt system is provided free of charge from CDR systems, Canada. The belt has specifically been chosen from other similar devices commercially available as it is independent of other immobilisation devices and can be used with the patient located within a full body vacbag as per current immobilisation position.

Sponsors

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Radiological or Histologically confirmed lower lobe lung cancer or histologically confirmed metastatic of primary cancer in abdominal organs including liver, pancreas, adrenal which meets criteria for SABR treatment. * Aged 18 years or over * Capacity to understand research proposal and give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Tumour sites excluding those previously defined * Rib metastases * Stoma if situated underneath belt * Patients unable to tolerate the abdominal compression belt * Patients with existing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To measure change in treatment volume between freebreathing and abdominal compression scans2 yearsOrgan motion will then be quantified using Eclipse. This facilitates a direct comparison to determine the efficacy of the compression belt. Patients with reduction in organ motion will be treated wearing the abdominal compression belt. The alignment scale will be recorded to facilitate accurate placement each fraction. compression belt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reported patient feedback regarding device comfort and compliance of use.2 yearsThe comfort of the device in clinical use will be measured by using a questionnaire that the patient will be asked to complete at initial scanning and then on two subsequent treatments. The results will be collated and analysed to qualitatively measure patient comfort and use of the device

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactMaria Maguire, PhD
maria.maguire2@nhs.net0151 556
Backup ContactDavid Price
david.price9@nhs.net0151 556

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026