Skip to content

Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection

Minimizing Pain During Office Intradetrussor Botox Injection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Protocols

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04270526
Enrollment
85
Registered
2020-02-17
Start date
2020-08-15
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder, Overactive Detrusor, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Overactivity; Behavior, Urge Incontinence

Brief summary

This will be a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing two pre-treatment protocols for patients undergoing intradetrussor botox injections to determine if a buffered lidocaine solution offers superior pain control.

Detailed description

Lidocaine is a commonly used amide-type local anesthetic. Lidocaine exists as both a quaternary water soluble structure, and a tertiary lipid-soluble structure. Only the tertiary lipid-soluble structure can cross the lipid bilayer of a cell membrane and thereby enter a neurons axoplasm and induce the desired effect. The ionization constant of lidocaine is 7.7 which means that at a pH of 7.7, 50% of lidocaine is available in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. At a physiologic pH between 7.35 and 7.45 only around 44% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. However, for lidocaine to be stable in solution, it is typically formulated as a hydrochloride salt and the pH of most commercially available lidocaine solutions are at a pH of 6.09. In an acidic solution the majority of lidocaine is available in the quaternary water-soluble structure and at this pH only 2.5% of lidocaine is in the tertiary lipid-soluble structure. A Cochrane review found that increasing the pH of lidocaine prior to injection decreased pain and increased patient satisfaction perhaps because of the aforementioned pharmacokinetic principles. Lidocaine is typically used as anesthetic for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder. In 2003, a technique for intradetrussor injections of onabotulinum toxin A was first described using only local anesthesia. At that time, the procedure involved intrauerthral lidocaine. The procedure has evolved since that time and currently many physicians utilize protocols with both utraurethral and intravesical lidocaine. At baseline intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections are generally well tolerated and with reported mean VAS scores around 3. For patients with refractory overactive bladder, the standard of care is intradetrussor onabotulinum toxin A injections. The standard protocol used by the investigators involves emptying the bladder then retrograde filling the bladder with a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine normal saline. This solution remains in the bladder for approximately 15 minutes prior to injection. Given that urine is typically acidic and commercially available lidocaine solutions are similarly acidic, it is likely that only a fraction of intravesical lidocaine is in the active tertiary lipid-soluble form. The goal of this study is to determine if the investigators can improve the procedural pain of intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin A injections using a buffered solution compared to our standard solution. After approval by the IRB, investigators will approach possible participants who are having intradetrussor botox injection for overactive bladder which is the standard of care for patients with refractory overactive bladder. If the patient meets eligibility criteria, consent forms will be signed and the patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive either our standard pretreatment regimen with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline or our buffered bicarbonate protocol with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. The primary end point of this trial is to assess the pain scores measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately following the procedure. Secondary end points include patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo repeat treatment and adverse events. All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design . At the completion of the procedure, patients will be asked to complete a brief questionnaire about their experience. Patients will follow up in clinic for a post-void residual check two weeks after the procedure as is standard for our clinical practice.

Interventions

DRUGBicarbonate protocol

Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate

Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline

Sponsors

Boston Urogynecology Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

All subjects will be randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to one of the two protocols using a random block design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patient * Primary diagnosis of overactive bladder * Failed first and second line therapy for overactive bladder * Planning to undergo bladder botox injections

Exclusion criteria

* Neurogenic bladder * Urinary retention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain: VASImmediately after the procedurePain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction: Likert ScaleImmediately after the procedureLikert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.
Willingness to Undergo Repeat ProcedureImmediately after the procedureLikert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Treatment
50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate Bicarbonate protocol: Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 45ml of 0.9% normal saline + 5 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate
37
Placebo Treatment
50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline Standard protocol: Intradetrussor treatment with 50 mL 1% lidocaine + 50ml of 0.9% normal saline
36
Total73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo TreatmentTotalActive Treatment
Age, Continuous71 years72 years74 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants73 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 360 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Pain: VAS

Pain on visual analog scale from 0-100 with higher scores worse

Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active TreatmentPain: VAS25 units on a scale, 0-100
Placebo TreatmentPain: VAS16 units on a scale, 0-100
Secondary

Satisfaction: Likert Scale

Likert scale questions assessing overall satisfaction with the procedure with responses from very 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with higher scores representing more satisfaction. We reported the percentage of participants who were satisfied we defined as a response of 4 or 5.

Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active TreatmentSatisfaction: Likert Scale68 percentage of participants with 4 or 5
Placebo TreatmentSatisfaction: Likert Scale39 percentage of participants with 4 or 5
Secondary

Willingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure

Likert scale questions assessing the patient's willingness to undergo a repeat procedure from very likely (1) to very unlikely (5) with five items total. We defined willingness to undergo repeat procedure as a score of 1 or 2 on the Likert scale and outcome measured was the percentage of patients who responded with a 1 or 2.

Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active TreatmentWillingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure72 percentage of participants
Placebo TreatmentWillingness to Undergo Repeat Procedure65 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026