Skip to content

Evaluation of Positioning Protocols on a Wheelchair in Hemiplegic Patients

Evaluation of Positioning Protocols with an Adapted Equipment on a Wheelchair in Hemiplegic Patients Following a Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04268641
Acronym
POSIT-HEMI
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-02-13
Start date
2020-08-28
Completion date
2023-12-11
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia And/or Hemiparesis Following Stroke

Keywords

Hemiplegia, Stroke, Wheelchair positioning, Propulsion, Pelvic posterior tilt, Obliquity

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to assess the interest of using wheelchair positioning equipment on the decrease of postural disorders, compared to the standard use of a wheelchair

Detailed description

The stroke is the main cause of hemiplegia in developed countries. Fifteen percent of people who say they have a stroke need, at home, a wheelchair to get from one room to another. The use of a wheelchair can cause postural disorders which can lead to pain, orthopedic deformity and pressure ulcers. This study aims to assess the interest of using wheelchair positioning equipment (Seat back, Positioning cushion and Belt) on the decrease of postural disorders. This decrease will be assessed after a standardized course, performed under three different conditions: with the positioning equipment (Positioning cushion and Seat back), with the positioning equipment and the belt and with the wheelchair alone. Clinical tool used to assess the decrease is the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 (SPCMA 2.0). This study, which will be the first prospective, interventional, multicenter, controlled and randomized study, could pave the way for guidelines of good practice, for wheelchair positioning of hemiplegic patients in France

Interventions

OTHERArm 1

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair 2. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion 3. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt

OTHERArm 2

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair 2. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt 3. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion

OTHERArm 3

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion 2. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt 3. : Standard Wheelchair

OTHERArm 4

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion 2. : Standard Wheelchair 3. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt

OTHERArm 5

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt 2. : Standard Wheelchair 3. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion

OTHERArm 6

Materials used for the course : 1. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt 2. : Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion 3. : Standard Wheelchair

Sponsors

Hôpital NOVO
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hemiplegic patient following a stroke * Hospitalized in a follow-up and rehabilitative care service, after hospital stays in a MCO service (neurology, neurosurgery or reanimation) * With a planned exit from hospital (homecoming, residential care facilities, nursing home, Long Term Care Unit …) * Patient whose wheelchair choice should be already done * Patient who propels the wheelchair with the valid hand and/or valid foot * Written informed consent (IC) obtained * Patients with affiliation to the social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Good walk recovery (FAC scale \>3) * Wheelchair with a double hand rim * Patient who cannot use his2 wheelchair independently * Cognitive disorders which prevent the ability to well understanding the instructions * Other pathology which can interfere with this protocol (Spinal disorder, morbid overweight (BMI\>40…)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of pelvic posterior tiltImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe Primary Outcome Measure is the variation of the Degree of pelvic posterior tilt at the end of the three standardized course. These courses were performed with Standard Wheelchair, Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion + Belt or with Standard Wheelchair + Seat back + Positioning cushion. The Degree of pelvic posterior tilt was measured using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variation of degree of lateral inclination of the torsoBaseline and immediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe variation of the degree of lateral inclination of the torso was measured between the beginning and the end of the three standardized course using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)
Variation of the degree of Pelvis obliquityBaseline and immediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe variation of the degree of Pelvis obliquity was measured at the end of the three standardized course using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 =moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)
Degree of lateral inclination of the torsoImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe degree of lateral inclination of the torso was measured at the end of the three standardized course using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)
Variation of Degree of pelvic posterior tiltBaseline and immediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe variation of the Degree of pelvic posterior tilt was measured between the beginning and the end of the three standardized course using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)
Measure of patient's satisfactionImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe satisfaction of patient was measured with a satisfaction questionnaire scale based on ease of movement, wheelchair comfort and pain during the course. For each item, patient ticks : Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied or unsatisfied, Unsatisfied or Very unsatisfied
Ability to achieve the whole courseImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayBinary criteria (Yes / No)
Adverse event collectImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayTotal number of adverse event
Degree of Pelvis obliquityImmediately after the end of the procedure, an average of 1 dayThe degree of Pelvis obliquity was measured at the end of the three standardized course using the SPCMA 2.0 score (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe retroversion)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026