Skip to content

Gonorrhoea Resistance Assessment by Nucleic Acid Detection (GRANDII)

Gonorrhoea Resistance Assessment by Nucleic Acid Detection: A Program Evaluation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04268342
Acronym
GRANDII
Enrollment
1626
Registered
2020-02-13
Start date
2022-04-26
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2022-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antimicrobial Stewardship, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Gonorrhea

Brief summary

Three sexual health clinical services across Australia and their associated pathology testing laboratories are implementing a new management program for gonorrhoea infection. The services are implementing the use of gonorrhoea drug resistance testing as part of routine clinical and laboratory practice, where drug resistance test results are provided to clinicians quickly to guide choice of antibiotic therapy. Clinicians will identify gonorrhoea infection that is ciprofloxacin susceptible so that it can be treated with ciprofloxacin therapy, rather than ceftriaxone.

Detailed description

This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of a new approach to antibiotic stewardship based on individually tailored antibiotic prescribing. Three sexual health clinical services in New South Wales Australia with high caseloads of gay and bisexual men will adopt a new management practice for gonorrhoea infection involving provision of tailored antibiotic therapy by clinicians at the time of gonorrhoea diagnosis and treatment, guided by the results of resistance testing. The services are implementing the use of gonorrhoea drug resistance testing as part of routine clinical and laboratory practice, where drug resistance test results are provided to clinicians quickly to guide choice of antibiotic therapy. This differs from existing practice where the prolonged turn-around times for drug resistance testing results mean clinicians must prescribe drug therapy without knowing these results. This can lead to increasing levels of drug resistance to ceftriaxone. The drug resistance test used in the new program detects genetic material (nucleic acids). It was developed and validated in Australia and is as accurate as existing culture-based drug resistance testing but provides quicker results. Patients treated presumptively at their first clinic visit will be treated with standard of care ceftriaxone. However, for cases treated at the return visit, clinicians will identify gonorrhoea infection that is ciprofloxacin susceptible so that it can be treated with ciprofloxacin therapy, rather than ceftriaxone. This will preserve ceftriaxone for situations where it must be used as the only effective drug available. Established patient follow-up procedures at clinical services will confirm that treatment has been successful. Quantitative data from the clinical and laboratory services in the study will be used to assess the proportion of all cases treated with ceftriaxone. The cure rate in gonorrhoea cases within the new management program versus standard care will also be assessed which will help illustrate the impact of the new management program.

Interventions

OTHERResistance guided treatment for gonorrhoea infection

For cases of gonorrhoea infection treated at the return visit, a nucleic acid assay will be used to determine individual eligibility for ciprofloxacin treatment

Sponsors

Kirby Institute
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Monash University
CollaboratorOTHER
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Melbourne
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
Griffith University
CollaboratorOTHER
Queensland Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
CollaboratorOTHER
SpeeDx Pty Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
NSW Health Pathology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Sydney
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Queensland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A before-after study design will be used to evaluate the proportion of all cases treated with ceftriaxone at return visit within standard care and the new management program respectively. Cure rates within the standard care and the new management program will also be assessed which will help illustrate the impact of the new management program.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with gonorrhoea infection at the return visit

Exclusion criteria

* Patients for whom ciprofloxacin is contraindicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ceftriaxone use12 months after implementation commencesThe proportion of gonorrhoea cases treated at the return visit with ceftriaxone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cure rateAt 12 months after implementation commencesThe proportion of gonorrhoea cases treated at the return visit with a negative test of cure within 2-4 weeks within the new management program versus standard care
Acceptability1-12 months after implementation commencesThe acceptability of the new management program to clinic and laboratory staff and stakeholders will be assessed through a qualitative research study design. Service staff and external stakeholders will be selected purposively to take part in semi-structured in-depth interviews at different stages of the study. Sampling will be informed by data saturation. All interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data will be analysed using a system of thematic 'open' and 'axial' coding. Findings will be descriptive.
Cost effectiveness12 months after implementation commencesThe cost effectiveness of the new management program compared to standard care from the health service perspective
Process evaluation12 months after implementation commencesTo document the processes involved in the implementation of the new management program

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026