Motivation
Conditions
Keywords
cognitive functioning, elderly, healthy, tDCS, motivation, memory, structural MRI, resting-state fMRI
Brief summary
Fundamental advancements in understanding successful aging are limited by the lack of causal, rather than just correlational methods to connect age-related changes in memory ability to changes in brain structure and function. In this study, non-invasive electric brain stimulation will be used as a tool to create causal links between successful memory function in aging and brain structures associated with motivation. Recently, it was shown that a group of elderly, dubbed superagers, are indistinguishable from young adults in memory performance and the structure of cortical limbic regions. A key superaging region is mid-cingulate cortex (MCC), a brain structure associated with motivation and tenacity. The MCC is a hub region that synchronizes information flow between three core brain networks. The goal of the research is to explore the contribution of motivation to memory performance by modulating MCC connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to provide the first causal evidence that experimentally induced motivation can improve memory performance. Since MCC has not been stimulated with tDCS before, we will test three different stimulation protocols and compare against a placebo. The stimulation protocols were computationally optimized for this project. The primary aim is to find the stimulation protocol most successful at improving memory performance. In order to elucidate the mechanisms behind these changes, effects of stimulation on motivation and network connectivity will be investigated. If indeed memory can be improved by increasing motivation and effort via stimulating MCC, this study will generate new insights into the motivational mechanisms of successful aging.
Interventions
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied. Stimulation amplitude is 2 mA. Stimulation duration is 20 minutes. The configuration used is two electrodes at AFz and CPz of the 10-10 electrode system.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied. Stimulation amplitude is 2 mA. Stimulation duration is 20 minutes. The configuration used is two electrodes at AF3 and AF4 of the 10-10 electrode system.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied. Stimulation amplitude is 2 mA. Stimulation duration is 20 minutes. The configuration used will be optimized to stimulate key nodes connected to MCC, including anterior insula, MFG and supramarginal gyrus, and designed using an individual head model that will be combined with each subject's measured connectivity map. The number of electrodes will be minimally 2 and maximally 32.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will be applied. Stimulation amplitude is 2 mA. Stimulation duration is 20 minutes. Placebo stimulation will be applied by ramping the current up and immediately down over 30 seconds. The configuration used is two electrodes at AF3 and AF4 of the 10-10 electrode system.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* between the ages of 65 and 80 * normal or corrected to normal vision * fluent in speaking, reading and understanding English * right-handed
Exclusion criteria
* any metal implants that may cause harm through MRI scanning * other metals that may interfere with obtaining MRI signals * claustrophobic * pregnancy * history of neurological or psychiatric illnesses * history of fainting, seizures or epilepsy * history of migraines * history of drug abuse * learning disability * intracranial lesion * any prescription or regular medication except for birth control * any uncontrolled medical condition * skin disease or damage on scalp * hair style or head dress that prevents electrode contact with the scalp * any condition affecting agility of hands (e.g. acute or chronic tenosynovitis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Feeling of difficulty from baseline | 1 week | Self-reports of difficulty will be queried during a memory task. Feeling of difficulty asks How easy or difficult do you think the task will be (did you find the task)? Answer is reported on a 7 point-scale. |
| Change in Estimates of effort from baseline | 1 week | Self-reports of effort will be queried during a memory task. Estimates of Effort asks How much effort do you think it will take you (did it take you) to complete the task? Answer is reported on a 7 point-scale. |
| Change in NASA Task Load Index from baseline | 1 week | NASA Task Load Index will be queried during a memory task. It includes self-report scales that provide state markers of cognitive effort. |
| Change in Time to complete unsolvable anagrams from baseline | 1 week | Time in seconds participants spend on unsolvable anagram task before quitting. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Intrinsic functional connectivity strength from baseline | 1 week | A measure of the strength with which mid-cingulate cortex and other brain regions are functionally connected, as measured with resting-state fMRI. |
| Change in California Verbal Learning Test score from baseline | 1 week | California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) is a comprehensive, detailed assessment of verbal learning and memory deficits in older adolescents and adults. The task asks participants to remember a list of 16 words. Higher scores mean better outcomes. |
| Change in Memory recognition discriminability (d') from baseline | 1 week | A standard measure of memory recognition performance in an associative memory task. |
Countries
United States