Skip to content

Comparation of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With Flexible Laryngeal Airway Mask

Comparation of Efficacy and Safety of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With Flexible Laryngeal Airway Mask in Otitis Media Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04268043
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-02-13
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia Intubation Complication

Brief summary

Objective To investigate the comparative effect of proseal laryngeal mask airway and flexible laryngeal airway mask during otitis media surgery. Methods 200 patients of ASA I or II classification, 18-65 years old, BMI\<30 kg/m2 undergoing otitis media surgery are randomly divided into two groups (Group P with proseal laryngeal mask airway and Group F with flexible laryngeal airway mask, respectively). After induction, selecting a appropriate size of LMA to patient,s weight, using the standard index finger-guided technique inserting the LMA, and then the patients were ventilated mechanically. The success rate of inserting laryngeal mask, the intubation time, surgery time and wake time were also recorded. Tidal volume and leakage pressure in patients with supine and lateral positioning were assessed respectively. The scale of fiberoptic bronchoscopy was also recorded to show airway exposure. Related complications such as sore throat, hoarseness, cough, laryngospasm, bloating, nausea and vomiting, soft tissue injury, blood residue after pulling out the LMA were analyzed.Postoperative voice and laryngopharyngeal symptom are also recorded.

Interventions

DEVICEflexible laryngeal airway mask

Ventilation with flexible laryngeal mask airway

Ventilation with proseal laryngeal mask airway

Sponsors

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of otitis media.

Exclusion criteria

Problems with the upper airway. Gastric carcinoma. Reflux esophagitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with cranial nerve injury1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with cranial nerve injury
tidal volume5 minute afer successful insertiontidal volume at 15cmH2O in patients with supine and lateral positioning
successful insert rate0 minute after insertionsuccess rate of inserting laryngeal mask
leakage pressure5 minute afer successful insertionleakage pressure in patients with supine and lateral positioning
The scale of fiberoptic bronchoscopy0 minute afer successful insertion1 = only vocal cords visible; 2 = vocal cords plus posterior epiglottis visible; 3 = vocal cords plus anterior epiglottis visible; and 4 = vocal cords invisible

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with sore throat1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with sore throat
Number of Participants with hoarseness1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with hoarseness
Number of Participants with cough1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with cough
Number of Participants with laryngospasm1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with laryngospasm
Number of Participants with soft tissue injury1hours after the surgeryNumber of Participants with soft tissue injury

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026