Skip to content

This Study is to Investigate the Effect of Etanercept in Early Versus Delayed Referral for Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Management of Iraqi Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis With Etanercept

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04267614
Enrollment
1226
Registered
2020-02-13
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2018-12-01
Last updated
2023-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis Rheumatoid

Brief summary

This study is to investigate the effect of etanercept in early versus delayed referral for management of rheumatoid arthritis patients assessing real-world patient data entered in the Iraq National Center of Rheumatology database between May 2012 and May 2017.

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Patients who received etanercept for RA

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed RA patients. * 18 years old and above. * Did not receive pervious biological treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Had previous biological treatment * Use etanercept for less than 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Month 12Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated high disease activity). DAS28 less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA.
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Month 12Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGA and physician global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores = high disease activity. CDAI total score = 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity and \> 22 = high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12Baseline, Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)DAS28 was calculated from the SJC and PJC using 28 joints count, the ESR (in mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated high disease activity). DAS28 \<=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA. Baseline was defined as Day 0 before receiving etanercept.
Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12Baseline, Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGA and PhGA assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; higher scores = high disease activity. CDAI total score = 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity and \> 22 = high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA. Baseline was defined as Day 0 before receiving etanercept.

Countries

Iraq

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data of Iraq participants aged greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years, who received etanercept for at least 1 year anytime from 2012 until 2018 for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and met American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2012 criteria for RA, were included in the study. Data were collected from Baghdad teaching hospital registry. Available data were evaluated in 1 month of this retrospective, observational study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants with RA received etanercept for at least 1 year (anytime from 2012 until 2018) under standard real world clinical practice, were included in this study. Data for these participants were studied for 1 month in this retrospective observational study.
979
Total979

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up115
Overall StudyParticipants did not meet inclusion criteria132

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age, Continuous48.06 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
813 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
166 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Month 12

The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC) and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGA and physician global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores = high disease activity. CDAI total score = 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity and \> 22 = high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA.

Time frame: Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met the inclusion criteria to use the data for analysis for retrospective observation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Month 1219 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Month 1222 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Month 12

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated high disease activity). DAS28 less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA.

Time frame: Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met the inclusion criteria to use the data for analysis for retrospective observation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Month 124.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Month 124.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12

The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGA and PhGA assessed on 0 to 10 cm VAS; higher scores = high disease activity. CDAI total score = 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates disease remission, \> 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \> 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity and \> 22 = high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA. Baseline was defined as Day 0 before receiving etanercept.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met the inclusion criteria to use the data for analysis for retrospective observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12Baseline27.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12Change at Month 127.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12Baseline28.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.35
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Mean Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Month 12Change at Month 126.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12

DAS28 was calculated from the SJC and PJC using 28 joints count, the ESR (in mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated high disease activity). DAS28 \<=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Participants were grouped based on early and delayed referral to management of RA with etanercept treatment. Early referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA from 1 to 9.9 years and delayed referral was considered when participants were referred to management of RA for \>9.9 years after diagnosis with RA. Baseline was defined as Day 0 before receiving etanercept.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (from the data retrieved and observed during 1 month of this study)

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants who met the inclusion criteria to use the data for analysis for retrospective observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12Baseline5.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Etanercept: Participants With Early Referral (1 to 9.9 Year)Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12Change at Month 121.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12Baseline5.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Etanercept: Participants With Delayed Referral (> 9.9 Years)Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Month 12Change at Month 120.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026