Skip to content

Minitouch Endometrial Ablation System Treatment for Menorrhagia: An Evaluation of Safety & Effectiveness

Minitouch Endometrial Ablation System Treatment for Menorrhagia: An Evaluation of Safety & Effectiveness (EASE Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04267562
Enrollment
219
Registered
2020-02-13
Start date
2020-02-28
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Heavy Uterine Bleeding, Menorrhagia

Keywords

excessive menstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, heavy menstrual bleeding, heavy uterine bleeding, menstrual disorders, menstruation disturbances

Brief summary

The EASE Clinical Trial is prospective, multi-center, single-arm (open-label), non-randomized, clinical trial to evaluate the Minitouch Endometrial Ablation System (Minitouch System) in premenopausal women with menorrhagia.

Detailed description

The EASE Clinical Trial a prospective, multi-center, single-arm (open-label), non-randomized, clinical trial of the safety and effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the Minitouch System versus the FDA identified objective performance criteria (OPC) for global endometrial ablation (GEA) devices. The goal of the trial is to support reasonable safety and effectiveness of the investigational product compared to currently FDA-approved GEA devices. Only eligible participants will undergo the Minitouch procedure. Post-treatment follow-up occurs approximately 24-hours post-procedure (via phone call) and in-person office visits occur 2-weeks, 3, 6 and 12-months post-procedure. Additional longer term follow-ups occur (via phone call or in-person office visits) 24 and 36-months post-procedure. The expected length of participation is approximately 37 months (inclusive of one month for screening and 36-months of post-procedure follow-up).

Interventions

DEVICEMinitouch System

The investigational treatment (endometrial ablation) will be performed utilizing the Minitouch System

Sponsors

MicroCube, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: Qualified participants must meet all of the following inclusion criteria. 1. Female age 30 to 50 years 2. Excessive menstrual bleeding due to benign causes 3. Uterine sounding depth measurement of 6.0 - 12.0 cm 4. A minimum uterine cavity length of 4.0 cm 5. A minimum PBLAC score of ≥ 150 for 1 menstrual cycle (obtained during screening) and must also have a documented history of excessive menstrual bleeding prior to study enrollment 6. Endometrial biopsy within 12 months prior to treatment procedure with no abnormal pathology 7. Premenopausal at screening as determined by FSH measurement ≤ 40 IU/L when age is ≥ 40 years 8. Patient agrees to use a reliable form of contraception during the study and to follow these requirements: (a) If a hormonal birth control method is used for contraception, the patient must have been on said method for ≥ 3 months prior to the onset of the screening menstrual cycle and agrees to remain on the same hormonal regimen through the initial 12-month post-treatment follow-up (pills, injections, patches, rings, implants); (b) Patient also agrees to not use hormonal birth control during the first 12-month post-treatment follow-up period if they were not using hormonal birth control during the 3 months prior to treatment 9. Ability to provide written informed consent 10. Patient is literate and clearly demonstrates understanding on how to use PBLAC after training 11. Patient agrees to the following during the study: (a) No initiation of hormonal contraception or any other medical intervention for bleeding; (b) Attend all follow-up exams through the 36-month follow-up timepoint; and (c) Exclusive use of study-provided sanitary products and submission of completed PBLAC diaries through the 12-month post-treatment follow-up Key

Exclusion criteria

Qualified participants must NOT meet any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Trial Participants With Device or Procedure-related Serious Adverse EventsMonth 12 post-procedureThe primary safety endpoint is the incidence of device or procedure-related serious adverse events.
Number of Trial Participants With Reduction in Menstrual Bleeding (PBLAC Score of ≤75)Month 12 post-procedureThe primary effectiveness endpoint is a clinical change in menstrual blood loss as assessed by the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) data, a validated, patient self-reported menstrual diary scoring system. Success for the primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as reduction in menstrual bleeding to a PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart) score of ≤75. Scale information for PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart): The scale minimum is 0, which indicates amenorrhea, i.e., no bleeding. There is no scale maximum. A score of 100 indicates eumenorrhea, i.e., normal menstrual bleeding. A lower PBLAC score indicates less bleeding and a higher PBLAC score indicates more bleeding.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Trial Participants With AmenorrheaMonth 6 and Month 12 post-procedureSecondary Effectiveness Outcome Measure - Amenorrhea rates where PBLAC = 0 (no bleeding)
Dysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreBaseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedureChange in quality of life as measured by Dysmenorrhea-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedureChange in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in work outside or inside the home based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely
Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedureChange in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in physical activity based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremelylimitations in social and leisure activities: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely
Number of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal BleedingMonth 12 post-procedureSecondary safety outcome measures are the number of trial participants that underwent medical or surgical intervention to treat abnormal bleeding.
Procedure Details: Type of Setting in Which the Procedure Took PlaceDay of Procedure (prior to the procedure)Secondary Outcome Measure - Setting in which the Minitouch Procedure took place Time frame: the type of setting is assessed on day of procedure, prior to the procedure
Procedure-related Pain ScorePre-Procedure (on day of, prior to procedure), Discharge (post-procedure, prior to discharge) and 24-hours post-procedureProcedure-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Timepoints: Pre-procedure (on the day of, prior to the procedure) Discharge (post-procedure, prior to discharge) 24-hours post-procedure (18-48 hours post-procedure)
Procedure Details: Recovery TimeDay of Procedure (post-procedure, prior to discharge)Secondary Outcome Measure - Total Procedure Recovery Time Time frame: assessed on the day of procedure/post-procedure, prior to discharge
Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedureChange in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in social or leisure activities based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely
Procedure Details: Number of Trial Participants in Which a Cervical Dilator Was UsedDay of Procedure (during the procedure)Secondary Outcome Measure - Use of Cervical Dilator (Yes / No) Time frame: the need for using a cervical dilator is assessed on day of procedure, during the procedure

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Additonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Month 36 post-procedureCount of subject contraception menthods reported at Month 36 to satisfy the post-approval study (PAS) reporting requirements; subjects could report more than one method of contraception so numbers may be greater than the total of subjects
Additonal Measure - Subject Self-Report of PregnancyMonth 36 post-procedureCount of subject self-report of pregnancy at Month 36 to satisfy the post-approval study (PAS) reporting requirements
Additonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse EventsMonth 24 and Month 36 post-procedureCount of number of subjects that reported gynecologic adverse events through Month 24 and Month 36;

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 219 subjects were screened for the Trial, and 114 subjects were considered treated-enrolled. The remaining 105 subjects were excluded prior to treatment assignment for the following reasons: 1. Trial enrollment reached: 21.9% (23/105) 2. Withdrawn consent: 8.6% (9/105) 3. Site closure: 5.7% (6/105) 4. Lost to follow-up: 1.9% (2/105) 5. Physician decision: 1.0% (1/105) 6. Screen failure (met one or more exclusion criterion(ia)): 61.0% (64/105)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch System
Eligible participants will undergo a single treatment (endometrial ablation) with the Minitouch System Minitouch System: The investigational treatment (endometrial ablation) will be performed utilizing the Minitouch System
114
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Assessed for EligibilityLost to Follow-up2
Assessed for EligibilityPhysician Decision1
Assessed for EligibilityScreen Failure64
Assessed for EligibilitySite closure6
Assessed for EligibilityTrial enrollment reached23
Assessed for EligibilityWithdrawal by Subject9
Month 24Elective hysterectomy1
Month 24Lost to Follow-up1
Month 36Elective hysterectomy2
Month 36Lost to Follow-up3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch System
Age, Continuous41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.66
Baseline PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart) Score264.9 score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 161.39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
108 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
114 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Premenopausal females
114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 114
other
Total, other adverse events
109 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Trial Participants With Device or Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events

The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of device or procedure-related serious adverse events.

Time frame: Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all subjects who met all Trial eligibility criteria and in whom the procedure was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With Device or Procedure-related Serious Adverse Events0 Participants
Primary

Number of Trial Participants With Reduction in Menstrual Bleeding (PBLAC Score of ≤75)

The primary effectiveness endpoint is a clinical change in menstrual blood loss as assessed by the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) data, a validated, patient self-reported menstrual diary scoring system. Success for the primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as reduction in menstrual bleeding to a PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart) score of ≤75. Scale information for PBLAC (Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart): The scale minimum is 0, which indicates amenorrhea, i.e., no bleeding. There is no scale maximum. A score of 100 indicates eumenorrhea, i.e., normal menstrual bleeding. A lower PBLAC score indicates less bleeding and a higher PBLAC score indicates more bleeding.

Time frame: Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all subjects who met all Trial eligibility criteria and in whom the procedure was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With Reduction in Menstrual Bleeding (PBLAC Score of ≤75)102 Participants
Secondary

Dysmenorrhea-related Pain Score

Change in quality of life as measured by Dysmenorrhea-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreBaseline6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreMonth 60.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreMonth 120.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Dysmenorrhea-related Pain Score

Change in quality of life as measured by Dysmenorrhea-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreBaseline6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreMonth 360.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Dysmenorrhea-related Pain Score

Change in quality of life as measured by Dysmenorrhea-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreBaseline6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemDysmenorrhea-related Pain ScoreMonth 241.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the Home

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in work outside or inside the home based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineNot at all8 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineSlightly15 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineModerately32 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineQuite a bit32 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineExtremely20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 36Not at all100 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 36Slightly5 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 36Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 36Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 36Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the Home

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in work outside or inside the home based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineNot at all9 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineSlightly17 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineModerately34 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineQuite a bit34 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineExtremely20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 6Not at all105 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 6Slightly7 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 6Moderately2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 6Quite a bit0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 6Extremely0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 12Not at all108 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 12Slightly3 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 12Moderately3 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 12Quite a bit0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 12Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the Home

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in work outside or inside the home based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 24Quite a bit3 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineNot at all9 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineSlightly17 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineModerately33 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineQuite a bit33 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeBaselineExtremely20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 24Not at all101 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 24Slightly7 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 24Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 2) - Limitations in Work Outside or Inside the HomeMonth 24Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical Activity

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in physical activity based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremelylimitations in social and leisure activities: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineNot at all1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineSlightly19 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineModerately25 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineQuite a bit37 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineExtremely25 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 36Not at all100 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 36Slightly4 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 36Moderately2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 36Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 36Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical Activity

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in physical activity based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremelylimitations in social and leisure activities: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineNot at all2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineSlightly20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineModerately27 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineQuite a bit38 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineExtremely25 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 24Not at all98 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 24Slightly10 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 24Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 24Quite a bit3 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 24Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical Activity

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in physical activity based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremelylimitations in social and leisure activities: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineNot at all2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineSlightly20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineModerately27 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineQuite a bit40 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityBaselineExtremely25 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 6Not at all107 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 6Slightly6 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 6Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 6Quite a bit0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth 6Extremely0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth12Not at all106 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth12Slightly5 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth12Moderately2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth12Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 3) - Limitations in Physical ActivityMonth12Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure Activities

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in social or leisure activities based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineNot at all7 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineSlightly20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineModerately28 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineQuite a bit36 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineExtremely21 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 24Not at all101 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 24Slightly7 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 24Moderately2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 24Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 24Extremely1 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure Activities

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in social or leisure activities based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline and Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineNot at all6 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineSlightly19 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineModerately26 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineQuite a bit36 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineExtremely20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 36Not at all102 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 36Slightly3 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 36Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 36Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 36Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure Activities

Change in quality of life as measured by Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4): Subjects were asked if they had any limitations in social or leisure activities based on the following categories: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, extremely

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineNot at all7 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineSlightly20 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineModerately30 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineQuite a bit36 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesBaselineExtremely21 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 6Not at all107 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 6Slightly6 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 6Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 6Quite a bit0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 6Extremely0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 12Not at all108 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 12Slightly4 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 12Moderately1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 12Quite a bit1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemMenorrhagia Impact Questionnaire (MIQ 4) - Limitations in Social or Leisure ActivitiesMonth 12Extremely0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding

Secondary safety outcome measures are the number of trial participants that underwent medical or surgical intervention to treat abnormal bleeding.

Time frame: Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all subjects who met all Trial eligibility criteria and in whom the procedure was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding

Secondary safety outcome measures are the number of trial participants that underwent medical or surgical intervention to treat abnormal bleeding.

Time frame: >Month 12 through Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all subjects who met all Trial eligibility criteria and in whom the procedure was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding

Secondary safety outcome measures are the number of trial participants that underwent medical or surgical intervention to treat abnormal bleeding.

Time frame: >Month 24 through Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all subjects who met all Trial eligibility criteria and in whom the procedure was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants That Underwent Subsequent Medical or Surgical Intervention to Treat Abnormal Bleeding1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants With Amenorrhea

Secondary Effectiveness Outcome Measure - Amenorrhea rates per the Investigator Global Evaluation (IGE)

Time frame: Month 36 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With Amenorrhea48 participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants With Amenorrhea

Secondary Effectiveness Outcome Measure - Amenorrhea rates per the Investigator Global Evaluation (IGE)

Time frame: Month 24 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With Amenorrhea49 participants
Secondary

Number of Trial Participants With Amenorrhea

Secondary Effectiveness Outcome Measure - Amenorrhea rates where PBLAC = 0 (no bleeding)

Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12 post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With AmenorrheaMonth 650 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemNumber of Trial Participants With AmenorrheaMonth 1259 participants
Secondary

Procedure Details: Number of Trial Participants in Which a Cervical Dilator Was Used

Secondary Outcome Measure - Use of Cervical Dilator (Yes / No) Time frame: the need for using a cervical dilator is assessed on day of procedure, during the procedure

Time frame: Day of Procedure (during the procedure)

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Number of Trial Participants in Which a Cervical Dilator Was UsedYes - cervical dilator used9 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Number of Trial Participants in Which a Cervical Dilator Was UsedNo - cervical dilator not used105 Participants
Secondary

Procedure Details: Recovery Time

Secondary Outcome Measure - Total Procedure Recovery Time Time frame: assessed on the day of procedure/post-procedure, prior to discharge

Time frame: Day of Procedure (post-procedure, prior to discharge)

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Recovery Time20.8 minutesStandard Deviation 22.7
Secondary

Procedure Details: Type of Setting in Which the Procedure Took Place

Secondary Outcome Measure - Setting in which the Minitouch Procedure took place Time frame: the type of setting is assessed on day of procedure, prior to the procedure

Time frame: Day of Procedure (prior to the procedure)

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Type of Setting in Which the Procedure Took PlacePhysician's office114 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Type of Setting in Which the Procedure Took PlaceOutpatient clinic/facility (surgery center)0 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure Details: Type of Setting in Which the Procedure Took PlaceAffiliated hospital0 Participants
Secondary

Procedure-related Pain Score

Procedure-related pain score using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (scale of minimum 0 to maximum 10, where 0 = no pain, 5 = moderate pain, 10 = worst pain). A higher score indicates a worse outcome. Timepoints: Pre-procedure (on the day of, prior to the procedure) Discharge (post-procedure, prior to discharge) 24-hours post-procedure (18-48 hours post-procedure)

Time frame: Pre-Procedure (on day of, prior to procedure), Discharge (post-procedure, prior to discharge) and 24-hours post-procedure

Population: The Per Protocol (PP) Analysis Cohort is comprised of all Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects who are treatable, completed the ablation procedure, and attended the 12-month follow-up visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure-related Pain ScorePre-procedure (on the day of, prior to the procedure0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure-related Pain ScoreDischarge (post-procedure, prior to discharge)2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemProcedure-related Pain Score24-hours post-procedure (18-48 hours post-procedure)1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Other Pre-specified

Additonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36

Count of subject contraception menthods reported at Month 36 to satisfy the post-approval study (PAS) reporting requirements; subjects could report more than one method of contraception so numbers may be greater than the total of subjects

Time frame: Month 36 post-procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Abstinence5 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Condom21 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Partner's vasectomy48 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Tubal sterilization30 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Hormonal method (includes pills, injections, rings, implants)4 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Intrauterine devices2 participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Contraception Status at Month 36Other (includes no method of contraception)4 participants
Other Pre-specified

Additonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events

Count of number of subjects that reported gynecologic adverse events through Month 24 and Month 36;

Time frame: Month 24 and Month 36 post-procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Bacterial vaginosis1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Urinary tract infection4 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Bladder pain1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Renal colic1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Renal mass1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Stress urinary incontinence1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Ureterolithiasis1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Urinary incontinence1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Anxiety1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Coital bleeding1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Menopausal symptoms1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Ovarian cyst1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 12 to Month 24: Uterine hemorrage1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 24 to Month 36: Bacterial vaginosis1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 24 to Month 36: Urinary tract infection1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 24 to Month 36: Dysuria1 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 24 to Month 36: Dysmenorrhea2 Participants
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Gynecologic Adverse Events>Month 24 to Month 36: Ovarian cyst1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Additonal Measure - Subject Self-Report of Pregnancy

Count of subject self-report of pregnancy at Month 36 to satisfy the post-approval study (PAS) reporting requirements

Time frame: Month 36 post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-Arm, Open-Label Treatment With the Minitouch SystemAdditonal Measure - Subject Self-Report of Pregnancy0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026