Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of BMS-986263 in Adults With Compensated Cirrhosis (Liver Disease) From Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multiple-Dose Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986263 in Adults With Compensated Cirrhosis From Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04267393
Enrollment
124
Registered
2020-02-12
Start date
2021-03-17
Completion date
2024-02-09
Last updated
2024-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Keywords

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Liver Disease, NASH, Compensated cirrhosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized study is to assess safety and effectiveness of BMS-986263 in adults with compensated cirrhosis (chronic liver disease) from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (fatty liver disease) (NASH).

Interventions

Specified dose on specified days

OTHERPlacebo

Specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with liver biopsy fibrosis score stage 4 (NASH CRN) performed within 12 months * Men and women must agree to follow methods of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Worsening liver disease or any disease might compromise participant safety in the opinion of the investigator * Known immunocompromised status or any disease or condition which might compromise participant safety * Prior exposure to BMS-986263 * Clinically relevant abnormal physical examination, vital signs, ECG, or clinical laboratory tests * Hepatic decompensation Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as Determined by Liver Biopsy After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12 WeeksPercentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as determined by liver biopsy after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis). Responder is defined as achieved \>=1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) as determined by liver biopsy from baseline to week 12/early treatment termination (ETT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12 WeeksPercentage of participants who achieve ≥ 2 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) with no worsening of NASH after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12 WeeksPercentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (modified Ishak score) after 12 weeks of treatment. A modified Ishak scoring system (0 to 6 scale) was originally developed to grade portal-based liver fibrosis associated with viral hepatitis. The modified Ishak system has been adapted to grade central-based liver fibrosis associated with NASH, and it also uses a 0 to 6 scale: 0: No fibrosis 1. perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis 2. perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis 3. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \< 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 4. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \> 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 5. early or incomplete cirrhosis 6. established or advanced cirrhosis
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12 WeeksPercentage of participants who achieve ≥ 2 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (modified Ishak score) after 12 weeks of treatment. A modified Ishak scoring system (0 to 6 scale) was originally developed to grade portal-based liver fibrosis associated with viral hepatitis. The modified Ishak system has been adapted to grade central-based liver fibrosis associated with NASH, and it also uses a 0 to 6 scale: 0: No fibrosis 1. perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis 2. perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis 3. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \< 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 4. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \> 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 5. early or incomplete cirrhosis 6. established or advanced cirrhosis
Mean Change From Baseline in CPA After 12 Weeks of Treatment12 WeeksChange from baseline in CPA after 12 weeks of treatment. Assessment of collagen proportionate area(CPA) is a method by which the amount (percentage) of collagen in stained tissue sections is analyzed using morphometric image analysis. This allows for a quantitative assessment of fibrosis. Percentage of fat in stained tissue sections is also analyzed using morphometric image analysis.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12 WeeksPercentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) with no worsening of NASH after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vitals Signs.From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)Includes body temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and heart rate. Blood pressure and heart rate should be measured after the participant has been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings.From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)Physical examination includes body weight, height, and BMI (height and BMI calculation at screening only).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram Readings.From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)Number of Participants with clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram readings.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in BMD.From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)Bone Mineral Density(BMD) will be measured by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Scan.
Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.12 WeeksPlasma concentrations of BMS-986263 components: siRNA, DPD, HEDC, and S104.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values.From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)Investigators must document their review of each laboratory safety report. A central laboratory will perform the analyses and will provide reference ranges for these tests. clinical laboratory assessments analyzed: Hematology, Blood Chemistry, Urinalysis and a Metabolic Panel.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Puerto Rico, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo
40
Treatment 1
BMS-986263 45mg QW
42
Treatment 2
BMS-986263 90mg QW
42
Total124

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
RandomizationAdministrative Reasons by Sponsor010
RandomizationAdverse Event100
Treatment PeriodAdministrative Reasons by Sponsor343
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event023
Treatment PeriodParticipant Withdrew Consent001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment 1Treatment 2TotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous58.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.76
60.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.65
59.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.98
58.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants18 Participants53 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants17 Participants42 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants7 Participants29 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants9 Participants26 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants32 Participants97 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants72 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants17 Participants52 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 410 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 3924 / 4129 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 391 / 412 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as Determined by Liver Biopsy After 12 Weeks of Treatment.

Percentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as determined by liver biopsy after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis). Responder is defined as achieved \>=1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) as determined by liver biopsy from baseline to week 12/early treatment termination (ETT).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Modified Intent to Treat Population (mITT)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as Determined by Liver Biopsy After 12 Weeks of Treatment.20.5 Percentage
Treatment 1Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as Determined by Liver Biopsy After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12.2 Percentage
Treatment 2Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score), as Determined by Liver Biopsy After 12 Weeks of Treatment.7.1 Percentage
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CPA After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Change from baseline in CPA after 12 weeks of treatment. Assessment of collagen proportionate area(CPA) is a method by which the amount (percentage) of collagen in stained tissue sections is analyzed using morphometric image analysis. This allows for a quantitative assessment of fibrosis. Percentage of fat in stained tissue sections is also analyzed using morphometric image analysis.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Total number of evaluable participants are those who have both baseline and Week 12/ETT biopsy available

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in CPA After 12 Weeks of Treatment-3.67 PercentageStandard Error 1.861
Treatment 1Mean Change From Baseline in CPA After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.35 PercentageStandard Error 1.374
Treatment 2Mean Change From Baseline in CPA After 12 Weeks of Treatment-3.67 PercentageStandard Error 1.973
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in BMD.

Bone Mineral Density(BMD) will be measured by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Scan.

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in BMD.0 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in BMD.0 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in BMD.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values.

Investigators must document their review of each laboratory safety report. A central laboratory will perform the analyses and will provide reference ranges for these tests. clinical laboratory assessments analyzed: Hematology, Blood Chemistry, Urinalysis and a Metabolic Panel.

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values.0 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values.0 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram Readings.

Number of Participants with clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram readings.

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram Readings.0 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram Readings.0 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram Readings.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings.

Physical examination includes body weight, height, and BMI (height and BMI calculation at screening only).

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings.0 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings.0 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination Findings.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vitals Signs.

Includes body temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and heart rate. Blood pressure and heart rate should be measured after the participant has been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vitals Signs.0 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vitals Signs.0 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vitals Signs.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study drug and that does have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: From First Treatment to end of Follow up (36 weeks)

Population: All Treated Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TEAE24 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TESAE1 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TEAE33 Participants
Treatment 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TESAE1 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TEAE34 Participants
Treatment 2Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)TESAE2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.

Percentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (modified Ishak score) after 12 weeks of treatment. A modified Ishak scoring system (0 to 6 scale) was originally developed to grade portal-based liver fibrosis associated with viral hepatitis. The modified Ishak system has been adapted to grade central-based liver fibrosis associated with NASH, and it also uses a 0 to 6 scale: 0: No fibrosis 1. perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis 2. perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis 3. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \< 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 4. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \> 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 5. early or incomplete cirrhosis 6. established or advanced cirrhosis

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.30.8 Percentage
Treatment 1Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.26.8 Percentage
Treatment 2Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.21.4 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.

Percentage of participants who achieve ≥ 1 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) with no worsening of NASH after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.20.5 Percentage
Treatment 1Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.12.2 Percentage
Treatment 2Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 1 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.4.8 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.

Percentage of participants who achieve ≥ 2 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (modified Ishak score) after 12 weeks of treatment. A modified Ishak scoring system (0 to 6 scale) was originally developed to grade portal-based liver fibrosis associated with viral hepatitis. The modified Ishak system has been adapted to grade central-based liver fibrosis associated with NASH, and it also uses a 0 to 6 scale: 0: No fibrosis 1. perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis 2. perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis 3. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \< 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 4. bridging fibrosis with linkage of \> 50% of vascular structures (portal and centrilobular) 5. early or incomplete cirrhosis 6. established or advanced cirrhosis

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.10.3 Percentage
Treatment 1Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.4.9 Percentage
Treatment 2Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (Modified Ishak Score) After 12 Weeks of Treatment.4.8 Percentage
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.

Percentage of participants who achieve ≥ 2 stage improvement in liver fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) with no worsening of NASH after 12 weeks of treatment. For the NASH CRN Fibrosis Score, fibrosis is staged on a 0 to 4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.2.6 Percentage
Treatment 1Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.0 Percentage
Treatment 2Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 2 Stage Improvement in Liver Fibrosis (NASH CRN Fibrosis Score) With no Worsening of NASH After 12 Weeks of Treatment.0 Percentage
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.

Plasma concentrations of BMS-986263 components: siRNA, DPD, HEDC, and S104.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: All participants who receive at least 1 dose of BMS-986263 and have any available concentration-time data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment 1Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.DPD519 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.2
Treatment 1Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.HEDC25.1 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 51.8
Treatment 1Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.S1044.16 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 141
Treatment 1Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.siRNA38.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 151
Treatment 2Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.DPD1138 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 80.7
Treatment 2Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.siRNA72.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 169
Treatment 2Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.S1043.68 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50.7
Treatment 2Plasma Concentration of BMS-986263 Components at the End of 12 Weeks or ETT.HEDC59.0 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026